Quality of Tuberculosis Care in Urban Patna, India
An Impact Evaluation of the Private Provider Interface Agency Program on Quality of Tuberculosis Care: A Standardized Patient Study in Patna, India
1 other identifier
interventional
321
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of the Private Provider Interface Agency (PPIA) program on quality of health care. The PPIA is a tuberculosis pilot program implemented in the private health sector of urban Patna in the state of Bihar, India.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 7, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 22, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedMarch 22, 2017
March 1, 2017
1.6 years
August 7, 2016
March 21, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Correct case management
Correct case management is defined as the proportion of interactions (across all standardized patient (SP) cases) or proportion of providers (by SP case) in which providers managed the case according to the Standards for Tuberculosis Care in India (STCI) within the PPIA program vs. outside the PPIA. Depending on the SP case, the outcome is an index composed of actions a provider did during the interaction with the SP: correct diagnostic tests ordered, correct or harmful treatment prescribed, or referral to a qualified health care provider. These details are extracted from an exit questionnaire that is completed by the SP within 2 hours of the interaction.
one year
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Essential history checklist
one year
Referral for further management
one year
Suspicion of tuberculosis
one year
Initiation of TB treatment
one year
Number of lab tests ordered
one year
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Tuberculosis Program (PPIA)
EXPERIMENTALIn Patna, 171 of the 321 participants were randomly selected to be sensitized and engaged into the program in Phase 1, and subsequently to receive the benefits of the PPIA intervention. Providers in the PPIA arm if engaged into the program will receive the benefits of the program, including but not limited to: ability to provide presumptive TB patients and TB cases vouchers for free or subsidized diagnostic testing and free first line anti-TB treatment (TB cases only); reimbursements for subsidized tests and anti-TB treatment; financial incentives to providers based on certain indicators; training opportunities, and access to a referral network.
No Tuberculosis Program (Non-PPIA)
NO INTERVENTIONThe remaining part of the sample in Patna selected randomly will be phased into the program at least a year after the PPIA arm in Phase 2. However, during the year of the study, they will not be engaged into the program.
Interventions
The intervention includes a variety of (1) non-financial incentives that are intended to reduce clinical and financial costs for presumptive TB patients and TB cases for diagnostic testing and treatment (free sputum microscopy, free digital chest X-ray, free or subsidized drug-susceptibility testing (DST), free first line anti-TB treatment), (2) training or certified medical education sessions for the providers from the PPIA, and (3) financial incentives to engaged providers for patient registration, diagnostic testing, treatment initiation, and treatment adherence. Meanwhile, health camps, advertising, and other advocacy efforts are aimed to raise awareness in the communities.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Formal providers (with Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) degree and higher) who were not enrolled in the urban PPIA program as of January 2015
- Daily outpatients of 20 or fewer (self-reported)
You may not qualify if:
- Formal providers enrolled in the urban PPIA program as of January 2015
- Formal providers who do not see adult pulmonary patients (e.g., pediatricians, orthopedists)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- McGill Universitylead
- World Bankcollaborator
- Institute of Socio-Economic Research on Development and Democracy (ISERDD)collaborator
- ACCESS Health Internationalcollaborator
Related Publications (1)
Das J, Kwan A, Daniels B, Satyanarayana S, Subbaraman R, Bergkvist S, Das RK, Das V, Pai M. Use of standardised patients to assess quality of tuberculosis care: a pilot, cross-sectional study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Nov;15(11):1305-13. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00077-8. Epub 2015 Aug 9.
PMID: 26268690BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Madhukar Pai, MD, PhD
McGill University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jishnu Das, PhD
World Bank
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Canada Research Chair in Epidemiology & Global Health, Director of McGill Global Health Programs, Associate Director of McGill International Tuberculosis Centre
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 7, 2016
First Posted
August 22, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
July 31, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 22, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03