Measuring the Context of Healing in Chronic Pain Treatment
HEALpain
1 other identifier
observational
218
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This project focuses on whether nonspecific factors as well as patient characteristics contribute to treatment outcome differences. The project uses assessment instruments, computerized adaptive tests (CATs), from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®). The research team has recently developed and tested (using PROMIS methods) a set of instruments to assess non-specific factors in healing from the patient's perspective. These instruments, the Healing Encounters and Attitudes Lists (HEAL) assess the Patient-Provider Connection, Treatment Expectancy, views of the Healthcare Environment, Positive and Negative Attitudes, Spirituality, and Attitude toward Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM). HEAL CAT's, like other PROMIS CATs, are brief, easy to use and understand, and are designed to apply to a broad spectrum of treatments and health conditions. In this project, the investigators aim to 1) evaluate whether HEAL predicts chronic pain treatment outcomes, 2) examine heterogeneity of treatment effects based upon HEAL and PROMIS scores in integrative and conventional medicine settings, and 3) interview patients and their clinicians regarding the utility of HEAL, PROMIS and a Pain Log for enhancing communication. The investigators will administer HEAL CATs and other PROMIS CATs (depression, anxiety, sleep disturbance, fatigue and physical function) to 200 patients who are starting treatment for chronic pain in integrative medicine and conventional medicine settings. Follow-up assessments will be completed 2 and 4 months after baseline testing. The investigators will evaluate factors that may predict which patients judge themselves to be improved, the same, or worsened. Some of the possible factors that may contribute to improvement include HEAL scores, emotional distress, or the preference for CAM or conventional treatment. The investigators are also interested in learning whether patients find the assessments to be clear and useful. A subset of 50 patients and approximately 10 clinicians will complete interviews about the HEAL and PROMIS questions, and about the Pain Log developed by a patient advocacy group partner, the American Chronic Pain Association. By interviewing patients and their healthcare providers, the investigators hope to determine the clarity and acceptability of the HEAL and other assessments, and to learn whether HEAL and PROMIS summaries enhance patient-provider communication in the clinical partnership.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Feb 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 12, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 19, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 2, 2017
CompletedAugust 2, 2017
April 1, 2017
1.8 years
August 12, 2016
February 28, 2017
April 21, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
PROMIS Pain Intensity
PROMIS Pain Intensity is a three item scale measuring the severity of pain at its worst (past week), average (past week), and current level using a five-point Likert-type scale (i.e., no pain=1, mild=2, moderate=3, severe=4, very severe=5). Scores on the 3 items are summed to create a raw score, which can range from 3 to 15. The raw score is converted to a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of the relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population.(see http://www.healthmeasures.net/promis-scoring-manuals for details ).
6-8 weeks
PROMIS Pain Interference
Computerized adaptive test measuring interference of pain in everyday functioning using five-point Likert-type scales with two types or response options (i.e., "not at all"=1, "a little bit"=2, "somewhat"=3, "quite a bit"=4, "very much"=5, and "never"=1, "rarely"=2, "sometimes"=3, "often"=4, "always"=5). Scores on the items are summed to create a raw score. The raw score is converted to a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of the relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population.(see http://www.healthmeasures.net for details of CAT administration and scoring).
6-8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI)
6-8 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Integrative Medicine (Complementary /Alternative)Group
Patients receiving chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, or meditation training for chronic pain
Conventional Medicine Group
Patients receiving conventional medicine care (physical therapy, medication management, injections, etc.) for chronic pain.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients who have ongoing pain (\> / = 3 months) who are beginning a treatment for their pain.
You may qualify if:
- years and older
- able to read and understand English
- able to answer questionnaires on a computer
- starting a new treatment for chronic pain or having just started a new treatment within the past month
- expecting to continue their course of treatment
You may not qualify if:
- psychotic disorders
- substance abuse by self report
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Carol M. Greco, Associate Professor of Psychiatry
- Organization
- University of Pittsburgh
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carol M Greco, PhD
University of Pittsburgh
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- ECOLOGIC OR COMMUNITY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Psychiatry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 12, 2016
First Posted
August 19, 2016
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
January 1, 2017
Last Updated
August 2, 2017
Results First Posted
August 2, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04