NCT02872909

Brief Summary

This study aims to examine whether the pain of topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is significantly different when using low irradiance ambulatory light emitting diode (LED) devices compared with conventional higher irradiance hospital based LED light sources when used for superficial non-melanoma skin cancer. The investigators are also investigating the phototoxicity and efficacy of each regime in this randomized assessor-blinded clinical trial.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2011

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2011

Completed
4.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 5, 2016

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 19, 2016

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 6, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 6, 2017

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 4, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

January 4, 2019

Status Verified

December 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

5.4 years

First QC Date

August 5, 2016

Results QC Date

October 24, 2018

Last Update Submit

December 12, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain on VAS Score

    assess on visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 0 - 10cm, with 0 representing no pain experienced through to 10 representing the worst pain imaginable. The participant marks across a 0-10cm unmarked line where their level of pain experience is and this is measured eg. 2cm if experiencing mild pain or 8.5cm which would represent severe pain

    one week after treatment

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Phototoxicity

    one week after treatment

  • Clinical Clearance of Lesion

    12 months after treatment

  • Patient Satisfaction

    one year after treatment - last visit

Study Arms (2)

low irradiance LED PDT

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Ambulight LED portable PDT treatment

Device: Ambulight (Ambicare Health)

conventional higher irradiance LED

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Conventional LED hospital based standard PDT treatment

Device: Ambulight (Ambicare Health)

Interventions

battery-operated low irradiance red light LED ("skin cancer plaster")

conventional higher irradiance LEDlow irradiance LED PDT

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Bowen's disease or superficial basal cell carcinoma referred for PDT and lesion not greater than 2.4cm diameter

You may not qualify if:

  • Unable to give consent, \>2cm diameter, lesions on highly curved surfaces where ambulatory device would not adhere

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (4)

  • Attili SK, Lesar A, McNeill A, Camacho-Lopez M, Moseley H, Ibbotson S, Samuel ID, Ferguson J. An open pilot study of ambulatory photodynamic therapy using a wearable low-irradiance organic light-emitting diode light source in the treatment of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Br J Dermatol. 2009 Jul;161(1):170-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09096.x. Epub 2009 Mar 19.

    PMID: 19302071BACKGROUND
  • Moseley H, Allen JW, Ibbotson S, Lesar A, McNeill A, Camacho-Lopez MA, Samuel ID, Sibbett W, Ferguson J. Ambulatory photodynamic therapy: a new concept in delivering photodynamic therapy. Br J Dermatol. 2006 Apr;154(4):747-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07145.x.

    PMID: 16536822BACKGROUND
  • Ibbotson SH. Irradiance is an important determinant of pain experienced during topical photodynamic therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Jul;65(1):201-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.060. No abstract available.

    PMID: 21679812BACKGROUND
  • Ibbotson SH, Ferguson J. Ambulatory photodynamic therapy using low irradiance inorganic light-emitting diodes for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer: an open study. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2012 Oct;28(5):235-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0781.2012.00681.x.

    PMID: 22971187BACKGROUND

Limitations and Caveats

Nil of note

Results Point of Contact

Title
Professor Sally Ibbotson
Organization
University of Dundee

Study Officials

  • Sally H Ibbotson, MD

    University of Dundee

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr Sally H Ibbotson

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2016

First Posted

August 19, 2016

Study Start

October 1, 2011

Primary Completion

February 6, 2017

Study Completion

February 6, 2017

Last Updated

January 4, 2019

Results First Posted

January 4, 2019

Record last verified: 2018-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

peer reviewed publications and presentations at international and national meetings

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
presenting study data at British Association of Dermatologists annual meeting Edinburgh 5.7.18 and abstract will be published in Br J Dermatol and full publication will follow
Access Criteria
via presentation and publication in peer-reviewed journal