Pharmacists as Immunizers to Improve Coverage and Provider/Recipient Satisfaction
1 other identifier
interventional
2,404
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This project proposes to implement and compare new community pharmacy-based strategies for improving vaccine coverage.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4 healthy
Started Feb 2017
Longer than P75 for phase_4 healthy
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 11, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 16, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 5, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 5, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 16, 2024
CompletedDecember 16, 2024
December 1, 2024
4.4 years
July 11, 2016
November 29, 2023
December 12, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Vaccines Administered by Participating Pharmacies in the Intervention and Non-intervention Communities Before and During the Intervention.
A 2-year demonstration program was conducted in two Canadian provinces (New Brunswick and Nova Scotia). One community in each province served as the intervention community, where pharmacies were allocated to implement various strategies specifically designed for each of the target vaccines. One community in each province also served as the non-intervention community, where immunization practice continued unchanged. Vaccine uptake was compared using pharmacy-generated reports of the number of vaccine doses administered before (from September 2015 to August 2017) and during (September 2017 to November 2019) the intervention and between non-intervention and intervention pharmacies.
At the time of vaccination, 1 day over two years from September 2017 to November 2019.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Compare the Number of Flu Vaccine Recipients Who Were Recruited and Completed the Online AEFI Survey Among Intervention Pharmacies Using Active Recruitment Strategies and the Non-intervention Pharmacies Using Passive Recruitment Strategies.
At the time of survey recruitment, 1 day over the 5-month period the surveys remained open during the influenza seasons
Determining the Awareness About Pharmacists as Immunizers and Vaccination Behaviours of the Targeted Public Using Pre-intervention and Post-intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs and Behaviours (KABB) Surveys
At the time of survey administration, 1 day over the 9-month period each of the surveys remained open
Determining the Attitudes and Beliefs of the Targeted Public About Pharmacists as Immunizers Using Pre-intervention and Post-intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviours (KABB) Surveys
At the time of survey administration, 1 day over the 9-month period each of the surveys remained open
Determining the Awareness of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) Guidelines and the Vaccinating Behaviors of Healthcare Providers Through Pre-intervention and Post-intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs and Behaviors (KABB) Surveys
At the time of survey administration, 1 day over the 9-month period each of the surveys remained open
Determining the Attitudes and Beliefs of Healthcare Providers Regarding Pharmacists as Immunizers Using Pre-intervention and Post-intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviours (KABB) Surveys
At the time of survey administration, 1 day over the 9-month period each of the surveys remained open
Study Arms (1)
Community (2 in NB, 2 from NS)
OTHERThere are four communities involved in the study, two in New Brunswick and two in Nova Scotia. All pharmacies in each community will be allocated to one intervention. Interventions include: High-Dose TIV, Meningococcal B Vaccine, Meningococcal ACWY vaccine, Tdap, Herpes Zoster vaccine and Travel Health vaccines (Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Typhoid Fever).
Interventions
Bexsero is indicated for active immunisation of individuals from 2 months of age and older against invasive meningococcal disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis group B.
Fluzone High-Dose is an injectable influenza vaccine made to protect against the flu strains most likely to cause illness for that particular flu season.
Tdap is a combination vaccine that protects against three potentially life-threatening bacterial diseases: tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (whooping cough).
Meningococcal ACWY vaccine is indicated for active immunization of individuals up to 55 years of age against invasive meningococcal diseases caused by Neisseria meningitides serogroups A, C, W-135 and Y.
Herpes zoster vaccine is indicated for the immunization of individuals 50 years of age or older for the prevention of herpes zoster (shingles).
Hepatitis A vaccine is indicated for immunization against infections caused by hepatitis A virus; Hepatitis B vaccine is indicated for immunization against infection caused by hepatitis B virus; and typhoid fever vaccine is indicated for active immunization against Salmonella typhi, the organism which causes typhoid fever.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- For the selection of the four communities include population size (approximately 30,000 adults \>18 years of age), stable population, service by a centralized regional hospital and local community hospitals, availability of community pharmacies, interest of community pharmacists (sufficient numbers of pharmacists qualified to provide vaccinations), and lack of substantial health care spill over to adjacent communities.
- Spill over is defined as a pattern of health-care utilization where patients regularly receive care at different regional health centers.
- Intervention communities include Saint John, New Brunswick and New Glasgow/Pictou/Antigonish, Nova Scotia area, which include the smaller towns of Stellarton and Westville, Nova Scotia.
- Control communities include Moncton, New Brunswick and Kentville/New Minas/Wolfville, Nova Scotia, which include the smaller towns of Canning and Coldbrook, Nova Scotia.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Canadian Immunization Research Networklead
- GlaxoSmithKlinecollaborator
- MCM Vaccines B.V.collaborator
- Canadian Center for Vaccinologycollaborator
- Dalhousie Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
IWK Health Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3K 6R8, Canada
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The demonstration program was not able to separate which of the various outreach strategies had the most impact on vaccination uptake (e.g., unable to separate simulated public funding from other outreach strategies such as posters, targeted outreach for the Tdap vaccine). This may be an indication that pharmacies focused on the Tdap vaccine because it was "funded" (simulated public funding).
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Jennifer Isenor
- Organization
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Scott A Halperin, MD
Dalhousie
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2016
First Posted
August 16, 2016
Study Start
February 15, 2017
Primary Completion
July 5, 2021
Study Completion
July 5, 2021
Last Updated
December 16, 2024
Results First Posted
December 16, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share