EUS-FNB vs. Single-incision Needle-knife (SINK) Biopsy for Gastrointestinal SELs
Endoscopic Ultrasonography Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) vs. Single-incision Needle-knife (SINK) Biopsy for Diagnosis of Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions
1 other identifier
interventional
104
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Sub epithelial lesions (SELs) of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are commonly identified during routine endoscopy. Most of these lesions are benign. However because there is the potential for malignant transformation it is important to correctly identify the lesion in order to determine if any further therapy and/or surveillance is necessary for the patient, particularly for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Obtaining a definitive diagnosis for SELs is often difficult since biopsies of the normal overlying surface mucosal layer are typically normal. EUS-FNA is the standard method by which a biopsy-proven diagnosis is obtained for most SEL's. However, the yield for a definite diagnosis from EUS-FNA for SELs is often suboptimal. Recently a new biopsy method, called "single incision needle-knife" (SINK) was introduced that may prove more useful in determining a definitive diagnosis. Furthermore, recent advances in core biopsy needles for EUS offer the hope for improved outcomes with EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (FNB). However, it remains unclear whether superior diagnostic outcomes are obtained using the new SINK biopsy method or using new EUS-FNB core needles.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started May 2016
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 4, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 15, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedAugust 15, 2016
August 1, 2016
1.9 years
August 4, 2016
August 9, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of patients receiving a definitive histologic diagnosis for gastrointestinal SELs by single incision needle-knife biopsy (SINK biopsy) vs. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB).
Percentage of patients in each group for whom the pathologist provides a definite histologic diagnosis based on the biopsy sample.
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Adverse events with SINK biopsy vs. EUS-FNB
24 months
Procedure time with SINK biopsy vs. EUS-FNB
24 months
Proportion of patients receiving a definite OR suspicious diagnosis for gastrointestinal SELs using SINK biopsy vs. EUS-FNB
24 months
Proportion of patients for whom a mitotic rate may be calculated for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) using SINK biopsy vs. EUS-FNB
24 months
Study Arms (2)
EUS-guided Fine Needle Biopsy
ACTIVE COMPARATOREUS-FNB is performed using a 22 or 25 G SharkCore biopsy needle with a minimum of 3 passes into the lesion.
Single incision needle knife biopsy
EXPERIMENTALSINK biopsy is performed under direct endoscopic visualization via EGD with a minimum of 3 biopsy samples obtained.
Interventions
EUS-FNB is performed using a 22 or 25 G core biopsy needle (SharkCore FNB, Medtronic, Fridley, MN) by standard linear EUS-guided technique. The needle tip has six cutting edge surfaces and an opposing bevel to catch tissue as it is sheared off, enabling cohesive units of tissue acquisition with minimal tissue fracturing. 3 separate passes will be done into the lesion. Additional passes may be made if clinically necessary. No suction will be applied on the first pass. If the FNB sample obtained is deemed to be inadequate, negative pressure (using the standard suction syringe) will be applied to the needle on additional passes. The histology and cytology specimens will be processed as per standard clinical care.
For patients allocated to the SINK group, after EUS confirmation, the esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) will be repeated to perform the SINK biopsy. Under direct endoscopic visualization, a 10 mm linear incision will be made to the surface of the SEL using a conventional needle-knife sphincterotome with standard blended electrocautery (Endocut mode - ERBE system USA, Marietta, GA). A conventional biopsy forceps will then be introduced through the incision deep into the mass to obtain at least 3 samples. The incision will then be closed using 1 to 3 endoclips for prophylaxis against subsequent bleeding. The biopsies will be placed in formalin as per standard surgical pathology protocol.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Undergoing diagnostic endoscopy for gastrointestinal SELs
- Tumor size ≥ 15 mm with endoscopically visible bulge
- SELs in esophagus, stomach, or duodenum
- Ability to sign the informed consent for diagnostic procedure
You may not qualify if:
- Lesions not requiring pathological evaluation (e.g. lipoma, cyst, varices)
- Underlying medical condition that contraindicates diagnostic endoscopy.
- Bleeding diathesis
- Inability to sign the informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada
Related Publications (2)
de la Serna-Higuera C, Perez-Miranda M, Diez-Redondo P, Gil-Simon P, Herranz T, Perez-Martin E, Ochoa C, Caro-Paton A. EUS-guided single-incision needle-knife biopsy: description and results of a new method for tissue sampling of subepithelial GI tumors (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Sep;74(3):672-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.05.042.
PMID: 21872716BACKGROUNDMekky MA, Yamao K, Sawaki A, Mizuno N, Hara K, Nafeh MA, Osman AM, Koshikawa T, Yatabe Y, Bhatia V. Diagnostic utility of EUS-guided FNA in patients with gastric submucosal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 May;71(6):913-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.11.044. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
PMID: 20226456BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christopher Teshima, MD, PhD
Unity Health Toronto
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 4, 2016
First Posted
August 15, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion
April 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
August 15, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share