To Compare the Efficacy Between 3 Fetal Monitoring Methods (EUM)
A Prospective, Blinded Clinical Study to Compare the Efficacy Between Three Fetal Monitoring Methods: Electro Uterine Monitor (EUM), Fetal Doppler and Scalp Electrode
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
400
0 countries
N/A
Study Start
September 2016
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
September 2019
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
September 2019
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Background: Identification and measurement of fetal heart tracings throughout pregnancy and labor is crucial to the well-being of the fetus. Non reassuring fetal heart rate is one of the most common indications for operative vaginal delivery or cesarean section. Therefore, management of labor requires reliable and accurate information about fetal heart rate. In most normal spontaneous labors, fetal heart rate is characterized by the baseline heart rate (from 110 to 160 beats per minute), variability (beat to beat changes) and periodic changes (accelerations or decelerations). In each stage of labor the tracing may have different characteristics, with variable decelerations much more common at the end of the second stage of labor. Objective: To Show non inferiority of the EUM to the fetal doppler and scalp electrode by comparing the reliability and accuracy of the EUM versus fetal doppler compared to scalp electrode in the same patients.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
September 2019
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
August 8, 2016
Actual (reported)August 11, 2016
Actual (reported)September 2016
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
September 2019
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
September 2019
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
The difference between the fetal scalp electrode tracings and the EUM tracings of the fetal heart activity.
Mean Positive Percent Agreement (PPA) for interpretable/un interpretable traces (between EUM, scalp electrode and fetal doppler).
Up to 72 hours
Reliability
Mean sensitivity for individual tracing identification (between EUM, scalp electrode and fetal doppler)
Up to 72 hours
Reliability
Mean Positive Predictive Value (PPV) for individual tracing identification (between EUM, scalp electrode and fetal doppler)
Up to 72 hours
Reliability
The mean False Positive Rate (FPR) for individual tracing identification (between EUM, scalp electrode and fetal Doppler)
Up to 72 hours
Once in labor, the parturient will be connected to the routine fetal doppler and EUM. When necessary according to clinical indications, the scalp electrode will be connected. Tracing will be recorded simultaneously from all three devices until delivery.
the parturient will be connected to the routine fetal Doppler and to the EUM. and When necessary to the scalp electrode will be connected. Tracings will be recorded simultaneously from all three devices until delivery. three separate outputs will be processed Output of the scalp electrode recording. Output of the fetal doppler. Output of the EUM. Three noncontinuous segments of 30 minutes each with two segments occurring during the first stage of labor and the third occurring during the second stage of labor, will be randomly picked from the scalp electrode recording with 3 matching segments in time from the EUM100pro and the fetal doppler
Yariv Yogev, professor
Tel Aviv Medical Center
First Submitted
August 8, 2016
First Posted
August 11, 2016
Study Start
September 2016
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
September 2019
the parturient will be connected to the routine fetal Doppler and to the EUM. and When necessary to the scalp electrode will be connected. Tracings will be recorded simultaneously from all three devices until delivery. three separate outputs will be processed Output of the scalp electrode recording. Output of the fetal doppler. Output of the EUM. Three noncontinuous segments of 30 minutes each with two segments occurring during the first stage of labor and the third occurring during the second stage of labor, will be randomly picked from the scalp electrode recording with 3 matching segments in time from the EUM100pro and the fetal doppler
the parturient will be connected to the routine fetal Doppler and to the EUM. and When necessary to the scalp electrode will be connected. Tracings will be recorded simultaneously from all three devices until delivery. three separate outputs will be processed Output of the scalp electrode recording. Output of the fetal doppler. Output of the EUM. Three noncontinuous segments of 30 minutes each with two segments occurring during the first stage of labor and the third occurring during the second stage of labor, will be randomly picked from the scalp electrode recording with 3 matching segments in time from the EUM100pro and the fetal doppler
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
September 2019
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Last Updated
August 15, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-08
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: