NCT02862912

Brief Summary

This study aims to determine whether or not spinal anesthesia with the local anesthetic drug, chloroprocaine, wears off faster than the local anesthetic drug, bupivacaine, and results in faster discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit after surgery.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
43

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2016

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 1, 2016

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 11, 2016

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 8, 2016

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 31, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 31, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 26, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

December 24, 2020

Status Verified

December 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

August 1, 2016

Results QC Date

May 7, 2020

Last Update Submit

December 23, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Chloroprocainecervical cerclagespinal anesthesiaBupivacaine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time to Resolution of Motor Block

    The mean difference between groups in time between the end of spinal injection (t IT) to time for no motor block (t motor), i.e. tIT - T motor. Motor block will be assessed using the Bromage scale: Bromage Scale I = free movement of the legs and feet = no block II = able to flex knees, with free movement of feet = partial (33%) block III = unable to flex knees, but with free movement of the feet = almost complete (66%) block IV = unable to move legs or feet = complete block (100%)

    3 hours

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Time to Ambulate

    5 hours

  • Time to Void

    5 hours

Study Arms (2)

Chloroprocaine (CP)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in CP group will receive 3% 2-chloroprocaine 50 mg (1.67 ml) and fentanyl 15 mcg (0.3 ml)

Drug: ChloroprocaineDrug: Fentanyl

Bupivacaine (BUP)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in BUP group will receive hyperbaric 0.75% bupivacaine 9 mg (1.4 ml), with fentanyl 15 mcg (0.3 ml), with saline (0.3 ml) to bring the volume to \~ 2 ml

Drug: BupivacaineDrug: FentanylDrug: Saline

Interventions

Administered as a single injection or continuously through an indwelling catheter - 50 mg

Also known as: Nesacaine
Chloroprocaine (CP)

A dextrose Solution is usually given as an injection - 9 mg (1.4 ml)

Also known as: Bupivacaine hydrochloride
Bupivacaine (BUP)

15 mcg Fentanyl will be included int he spinal anesthetic in both groups

Also known as: Sublimaze
Bupivacaine (BUP)Chloroprocaine (CP)
SalineDRUG

Preservative free normal saline (0.3 ml) to bring the volume to \~ 2 ml

Also known as: Salt water
Bupivacaine (BUP)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ASA I and II women
  • yrs old
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Cervical cerclage 1st or 2nd trimester of pregnancy undergoing with spinal anesthesia
  • Height 150 - 180 cm
  • BMI ≤ 40 kg/m2.

You may not qualify if:

  • Any contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia (history of neurologic disease (e.g., multiple sclerosis, spinal stenosis, central or peripheral neuropathy)
  • Pre-existing/chronic back pain
  • Ester local anesthetic allergy, PABA allergy
  • History of atypical cholinesterase (CP is metabolized by cholinesterase)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

New York Presbyterian Hospital

New York, New York, 10032, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Camponovo C, Wulf H, Ghisi D, Fanelli A, Riva T, Cristina D, Vassiliou T, Leschka K, Fanelli G. Intrathecal 1% 2-chloroprocaine vs. 0.5% bupivacaine in ambulatory surgery: a prospective, observer-blinded, randomised, controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 May;58(5):560-6. doi: 10.1111/aas.12291. Epub 2014 Mar 6.

    PMID: 24601887BACKGROUND
  • Hejtmanek MR, Pollock JE. Chloroprocaine for spinal anesthesia: a retrospective analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011 Mar;55(3):267-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02371.x.

    PMID: 21288208BACKGROUND
  • Lee A, Shatil B, Landau R, Menon P, Smiley R. Intrathecal 2-Chloroprocaine 3% Versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.75% for Cervical Cerclage: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2022 Mar 1;134(3):624-632. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005653.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

chloroprocaineBupivacaineFentanylSodium ChlorideFluoridation

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesPiperidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsChloridesHydrochloric AcidChlorine CompoundsInorganic ChemicalsSodium CompoundsPreventive DentistryDentistryPublic Health DentistryEnvironment and Public Health

Limitations and Caveats

Despite low dropout risk, we proposed to enroll an additional 4 subjects/group above calculated sample size. The significantly shorter discharge times among some subjects became increasingly apparent. It became untenable to claim clinical equipoise. After the originally calculated sample size was achieved, we decided to stop enrolling new cases, accounting for uneven group numbers. A Shapiro-Wilk test indicated block resolution and discharge time data was non-normal (medians \[IQR\] reported).

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Allison Lee
Organization
Columbia University

Study Officials

  • Richard Smiley, MD

    Columbia University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Anesthesiology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2016

First Posted

August 11, 2016

Study Start

November 8, 2016

Primary Completion

January 31, 2020

Study Completion

January 31, 2020

Last Updated

December 24, 2020

Results First Posted

May 26, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

A research report will be written and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
Time Frame
Submission will be made by December, 2020. Publication availability is to be determined by the peer review process. Once published, the data should be available indefinitely.
Access Criteria
To be determined.

Locations