Chloroprocaine Spinal Anesthesia for Cervical Cerclage (CP Spinal)
Chloroprocaine Versus Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia for Cervical Cerclage
1 other identifier
interventional
43
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to determine whether or not spinal anesthesia with the local anesthetic drug, chloroprocaine, wears off faster than the local anesthetic drug, bupivacaine, and results in faster discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit after surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Nov 2016
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 11, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 8, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 26, 2020
CompletedDecember 24, 2020
December 1, 2020
3.2 years
August 1, 2016
May 7, 2020
December 23, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to Resolution of Motor Block
The mean difference between groups in time between the end of spinal injection (t IT) to time for no motor block (t motor), i.e. tIT - T motor. Motor block will be assessed using the Bromage scale: Bromage Scale I = free movement of the legs and feet = no block II = able to flex knees, with free movement of feet = partial (33%) block III = unable to flex knees, but with free movement of the feet = almost complete (66%) block IV = unable to move legs or feet = complete block (100%)
3 hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Time to Ambulate
5 hours
Time to Void
5 hours
Study Arms (2)
Chloroprocaine (CP)
EXPERIMENTALPatients in CP group will receive 3% 2-chloroprocaine 50 mg (1.67 ml) and fentanyl 15 mcg (0.3 ml)
Bupivacaine (BUP)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in BUP group will receive hyperbaric 0.75% bupivacaine 9 mg (1.4 ml), with fentanyl 15 mcg (0.3 ml), with saline (0.3 ml) to bring the volume to \~ 2 ml
Interventions
Administered as a single injection or continuously through an indwelling catheter - 50 mg
A dextrose Solution is usually given as an injection - 9 mg (1.4 ml)
15 mcg Fentanyl will be included int he spinal anesthetic in both groups
Preservative free normal saline (0.3 ml) to bring the volume to \~ 2 ml
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA I and II women
- yrs old
- Singleton pregnancy
- Cervical cerclage 1st or 2nd trimester of pregnancy undergoing with spinal anesthesia
- Height 150 - 180 cm
- BMI ≤ 40 kg/m2.
You may not qualify if:
- Any contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia (history of neurologic disease (e.g., multiple sclerosis, spinal stenosis, central or peripheral neuropathy)
- Pre-existing/chronic back pain
- Ester local anesthetic allergy, PABA allergy
- History of atypical cholinesterase (CP is metabolized by cholinesterase)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
New York Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Related Publications (3)
Camponovo C, Wulf H, Ghisi D, Fanelli A, Riva T, Cristina D, Vassiliou T, Leschka K, Fanelli G. Intrathecal 1% 2-chloroprocaine vs. 0.5% bupivacaine in ambulatory surgery: a prospective, observer-blinded, randomised, controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 May;58(5):560-6. doi: 10.1111/aas.12291. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
PMID: 24601887BACKGROUNDHejtmanek MR, Pollock JE. Chloroprocaine for spinal anesthesia: a retrospective analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011 Mar;55(3):267-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02371.x.
PMID: 21288208BACKGROUNDLee A, Shatil B, Landau R, Menon P, Smiley R. Intrathecal 2-Chloroprocaine 3% Versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.75% for Cervical Cerclage: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2022 Mar 1;134(3):624-632. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005653.
PMID: 34153006DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Despite low dropout risk, we proposed to enroll an additional 4 subjects/group above calculated sample size. The significantly shorter discharge times among some subjects became increasingly apparent. It became untenable to claim clinical equipoise. After the originally calculated sample size was achieved, we decided to stop enrolling new cases, accounting for uneven group numbers. A Shapiro-Wilk test indicated block resolution and discharge time data was non-normal (medians \[IQR\] reported).
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Allison Lee
- Organization
- Columbia University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard Smiley, MD
Columbia University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 1, 2016
First Posted
August 11, 2016
Study Start
November 8, 2016
Primary Completion
January 31, 2020
Study Completion
January 31, 2020
Last Updated
December 24, 2020
Results First Posted
May 26, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
- Time Frame
- Submission will be made by December, 2020. Publication availability is to be determined by the peer review process. Once published, the data should be available indefinitely.
- Access Criteria
- To be determined.
A research report will be written and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal