Cost Utility Analysis of HD and CAPD in Ministry of Health Dialysis Centres, Malaysia
Cost Utility Analysis of End Stage Renal Disease Treatment in Ministry of Health Dialysis Centres, Malaysia: Haemodialysis Versus Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis
1 other identifier
observational
173
1 country
5
Brief Summary
End-stage renal disease represents a major problem for public health, and is a severe disease affecting hundreds of millions of people in the world and increasing rapidly. It brings about complex implications to social and economic structures of every nation. Providing renal replacement therapy including , peritoneal dialysis and renal transplants for ESRD patients are resource intensive. Possible options have been proposed to ease the burden include early medical intervention to slow the progression of chronic kidney disease in high-risk patients, promotion of renal transplantation, and use of the most cost-effective dialysis therapy without compromising outcome. In Malaysia, despite growing financial pressure in health care system, cost-effectiveness studies of RRT modalities are scarce.The prevalence of ESRD patients on dialysis are approximately 34, 767 as of 2014 and expected to rise significantly in the foreseeable future. Thus, the sustainability of dialysis therapy is uncertain. This study aimed to assess the cost utility of hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis treatment from Malaysia Ministry of Health perspective. One hundred and eighty patients will be recruited from five state hospitals via National Renal Registry. Patients' resource utilization including overhead costs, medications, dialysis consumables and hospitalizations will be recorded using specially designed case report form. Patients' quality of life will be assessed using validated EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. Survival analysis will be conducted based on NRR data. Next, a hypothetical cohort Markov model will be constructed to assess the cost utility of HD and CAPD using varying levels of CAPD use versus current practice. The data collection period is from 1st October 2016 to 30th September 2017. Incremental cost effectiveness ratio is the primary outcome of this study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2016
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 8, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 11, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2018
CompletedApril 2, 2018
March 1, 2018
11 months
August 8, 2016
March 30, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incremental cost effectiveness ratio
Obtained by dividing the difference between the costs of the two dialysis modalities by the difference in the outcomes (QALY).
1st October 2016-30th September 2017
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Incremental cost effectiveness ratio of varying levels of CAPD use versus current practice
1st October 2016-30th September 2017
Study Arms (2)
Hemodialysis (HD)
HD patients in MOH dialysis centres notified to NRR.
Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD)
CAPD patients in MOH dialysis centres notified to NRR.
Eligibility Criteria
The study population is all ESRD patients on HD or CAPD in MOH dialysis centres and their data are being notified to NRR. The sampling frame is patient commenced dialysis from 2011-2015.
You may qualify if:
- Chronic dialysis
- Alive
- Adult patients above 18 years old
- MOH subsidized patients
You may not qualify if:
- Female pregnant patients
- Patients with cognitive/psychological disorder
- Patients with evident poor mental dexterity
- Patients switch dialysis modality during study period
- Patient underwent kidney transplant during study period
- Patient died during the study period
- Patient transfer to another institution during study period
- Patient with advanced disease i.e. cancer, advanced heart disease
- Only MOH subsidized patients are included in this study. For CAPD, patients sponsored by the Public Service Department, Social Security Organization (SOCSO), Baitumals or NGOs including National Kidney Foundation are excluded due to different reimbursement rates for medications, dialysis solutions and consumables.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Hospital Sultanah Aminah
Johor Bahru, Johor, 80100, Malaysia
Hospital Tengku Apuan Afzan
Kuantan, Pahang, 25100, Malaysia
Hospital Pulau Pinang
George Town, Pulau Pinang, 10990, Malaysia
Hospital Tengku Ampuan Rahimah
Klang, Selangor, 41200, Malaysia
Hospital Kuala Lumpur
Kuala Lumpur, 50586, Malaysia
Related Publications (16)
World Health Organization, Global Burden of Disease. 2014. Regional Estimates for 2000-2012, DALY Estimates. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates/en/index2.html
BACKGROUNDFresenius Medical Care. 2013. ESRD patients in 2013, "A Global Perspective". Retrieved from http://www.vision-fmc.com/files/ESRD_Patients_in_2013.pdf
BACKGROUNDGoh, B.L. and Ong, L.M (Eds).2014. 22nd Report of the Malaysian Dialysis and Transplant Registry. National Renal Registry.
BACKGROUNDInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME).2013. Malaysia Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 (GBD 2010) Results 1990-2010. Seattle, United States.
BACKGROUNDLevey AS, Atkins R, Coresh J, Cohen EP, Collins AJ, Eckardt KU, Nahas ME, Jaber BL, Jadoul M, Levin A, Powe NR, Rossert J, Wheeler DC, Lameire N, Eknoyan G. Chronic kidney disease as a global public health problem: approaches and initiatives - a position statement from Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes. Kidney Int. 2007 Aug;72(3):247-59. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002343. Epub 2007 Jun 13.
PMID: 17568785BACKGROUNDUnited States Renal Data System (USRD). 2015. Chapter 11: Medicare expenditures forperson with ESRD. Retrieved from http://www.usrds.org/2015/view/v2_11.aspx
BACKGROUNDKerr M, Bray B, Medcalf J, O'Donoghue DJ, Matthews B. Estimating the financial cost of chronic kidney disease to the NHS in England. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Oct;27 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii73-80. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs269. Epub 2012 Aug 5.
PMID: 22815543BACKGROUNDGreen, F. and Ryan, C. 2009. Health care expenditure on chronic kidney disease in Australia, 2009 Cat. no. PHE 117. Canberra: AIHW. Retrieved from http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=6442468279
BACKGROUNDMalaysia National Health Account (MNHA), Planning Division. 2013. Health Expenditure Report 1997-2012. Ministry of Health Malaysia.
BACKGROUNDLim TO, Goh A, Lim YN, Mohamad Zaher ZM, Suleiman AB. How public and private reforms dramatically improved access to dialysis therapy in Malaysia. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Dec;29(12):2214-22. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0135.
PMID: 21134922BACKGROUNDEBPG (European Expert Group on Renal Transplantation); European Renal Association (ERA-EDTA); European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT). European Best Practice Guidelines for Renal Transplantation (part 1). Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000;15 Suppl 7:1-85. No abstract available.
PMID: 11286185BACKGROUNDSennfalt K, Magnusson M, Carlsson P. Comparison of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis--a cost-utility analysis. Perit Dial Int. 2002 Jan-Feb;22(1):39-47.
PMID: 11929142BACKGROUNDMeier-Kriesche HU, Schold JD, Srinivas TR, Reed A, Kaplan B. Kidney transplantation halts cardiovascular disease progression in patients with end-stage renal disease. Am J Transplant. 2004 Oct;4(10):1662-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00573.x.
PMID: 15367222BACKGROUNDWinkelmayer WC, Glynn RJ, Mittleman MA, Levin R, Pliskin JS, Avorn J. Comparing mortality of elderly patients on hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: a propensity score approach. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002 Sep;13(9):2353-62. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000025785.41314.76.
PMID: 12191980BACKGROUNDHooi LS, Lim TO, Goh A, Wong HS, Tan CC, Ahmad G, Morad Z. Economic evaluation of centre haemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Ministry of Health hospitals, Malaysia. Nephrology (Carlton). 2005 Feb;10(1):25-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2005.00360.x.
PMID: 15705178BACKGROUNDYusof FA, Goh A, Azmi S. Estimating an EQ-5D value set for Malaysia using time trade-off and visual analogue scale methods. Value Health. 2012 Jan-Feb;15(1 Suppl):S85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.11.024.
PMID: 22265073BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abdul Halim Abdul Gafor, MBBS, MMED
Nephrology unit, Department of Medicine, National University of Malaysia
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohd Rizal Abdul Manaf, MBBS, PhD
Department of Community Health, National University of Malaysia
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Naren Kumar Surendra
Department of Community Health, National University of Malaysia
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD Student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 8, 2016
First Posted
August 11, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion
September 1, 2017
Study Completion
March 1, 2018
Last Updated
April 2, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03