Feasibility of Using Functional Progression to Guide the Treatment of Adolescent Low Back Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
16
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The goal of the proposed research is to test the feasibility of a functional progression program to reduce cost and possible radiation exposure for adolescent athletes with low back pain. Specifically the investigators plan to test the feasibility of using progression in rehabilitation to pragmatically differentially diagnose and treat adolescent athletes with low back pain, instead of using advanced imaging which is the current practice. The investigators propose to recruit 20 participants, with 10 of usual care (advanced imaging) and 10 of proposed intervention (functional progression) to assess the feasibility of using functional progress to guide treatment. The outcomes measured will be number of days for rest, time to start regular rehabilitation, pain experienced, functional outcomes, ability to return to sport, time needed to return to sport. If this pilot demonstrates the feasibility and a decreased rate of advanced imaging and similar clinical outcomes the investigators plan to progress this work into larger trials.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Aug 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable low-back-pain
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 3, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 10, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2018
CompletedOctober 2, 2018
September 1, 2018
2 years
August 3, 2016
September 28, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Utilization of advanced imaging
Advanced imaging will be defined as anything beyond radiography (x-ray) used to diagnose patients low back pain
Approximately 3 months (Discharge from medical care (both physician and physical therapist))
Total cost of care
Total billed from hospital for the low back pain episode of care
Approximately 3 months (Discharge from medical care (both physician and physical therapist))
Secondary Outcomes (3)
The number of days to return to all sporting activity.
Approximately 3 months (Discharge from medical care (both physician and physical therapist))
Change in Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Baseline, Approximately 3 months (Discharge from medical care (both physician and physical therapist))
Change in Micheli Functional Scale
Baseline, Approximately 3 months (Discharge from medical care (both physician and physical therapist))
Study Arms (2)
Standard Care Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient in the treatment arm will receive the Standard Model of Care as prescribed for their condition by their physician including but not limited to Advanced imaging, Rest, Bracing, Physical Therapy, and Medication.
Functional Progression Group
EXPERIMENTALPatients who are randomized to the alternative model of care to guide treatment will not have advanced imaging done and will be referred directly to physical therapy care . If the patient is able to functional progress through phase I and II of physical therapy within 3 weeks and phase III within 5 weeks then they return to sport. If patient are unable to progress the are put on rest as a presumed vertebral injury (spondylolysis).
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 12-19 years old
- Primary complaint of acute low back pain (\<3months)
- Participates in some type of athletic activity on a regular basis (\>2 times a week)
- Pain increases with lumbar extension
You may not qualify if:
- Advanced imaging performed already (MRI, SPECT, CT)
- Red flags present (bowel/bladder problems, saddle anesthesia, progressive neurological deficits, recent fever or infection, unexplained weight loss, unable to change symptoms with mechanical testing)
- Numbness and tingling in any lumbar dermatome
- Previous rest from sport \>4 weeks without improved symptoms
- Other orthopedic injury or condition that would alter the plan of care for LBP (i.e. pregnancy, concomitant anterior cruciate ligament tear)
- History of lumbar surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Nationwide Children's Hospital Sports and Ortho PT East Broad
Columbus, Ohio, 43213, United States
Nationwide Children's Hospital Sports and Ortho PT Dublin
Dublin, Ohio, 43017, United States
Nationwide Children's Hospital Sports and Ortho PT New Albany
New Albany, Ohio, 43054, United States
Nationwide Children's Hospital Sports and Orthopedic PT Westerville location
Westerville, Ohio, 43082, United States
Related Publications (13)
Balague F, Dutoit G, Waldburger M. Low back pain in schoolchildren. An epidemiological study. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1988;20(4):175-9.
PMID: 2976526BACKGROUNDBurton AK, Clarke RD, McClune TD, Tillotson KM. The natural history of low back pain in adolescents. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Oct 15;21(20):2323-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199610150-00004.
PMID: 8915066BACKGROUNDEbrall PS. The epidemiology of male adolescent low back pain in a north suburban population of Melbourne, Australia. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1994 Sep;17(7):447-53.
PMID: 7989878BACKGROUNDMicheli LJ, Wood R. Back pain in young athletes. Significant differences from adults in causes and patterns. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995 Jan;149(1):15-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170130017004.
PMID: 7827653BACKGROUNDd'Hemecourt PA, Zurakowski D, d'Hemecourt CA, Curtis C, Ugrinow V, Deriu L, Micheli LJ. Validation of a new instrument for evaluating low back pain in the young athlete. Clin J Sport Med. 2012 May;22(3):244-8. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318249a3ce.
PMID: 22382433BACKGROUNDMiller R, Beck NA, Sampson NR, Zhu X, Flynn JM, Drummond D. Imaging modalities for low back pain in children: a review of spondyloysis and undiagnosed mechanical back pain. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013 Apr-May;33(3):282-8. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318287fffb.
PMID: 23482264BACKGROUNDEl Rassi G, Takemitsu M, Glutting J, Shah SA. Effect of sports modification on clinical outcome in children and adolescent athletes with symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Dec;92(12):1070-4. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318296da7e.
PMID: 24141103BACKGROUNDIwamoto J, Sato Y, Takeda T, Matsumoto H. Return to sports activity by athletes after treatment of spondylolysis. World J Orthop. 2010 Nov 18;1(1):26-30. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v1.i1.26.
PMID: 22474624BACKGROUNDSelhorst M, Fischer A, Graft K, Ravindran R, Peters E, Rodenberg R, Welder E, MacDonald J. Timing of Physical Therapy Referral in Adolescent Athletes With Acute Spondylolysis: A Retrospective Chart Review. Clin J Sport Med. 2017 May;27(3):296-301. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000334.
PMID: 27347866BACKGROUNDKlein G, Mehlman CT, McCarty M. Nonoperative treatment of spondylolysis and grade I spondylolisthesis in children and young adults: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Mar;29(2):146-56. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181977fc5.
PMID: 19352240BACKGROUNDCongeni J, McCulloch J, Swanson K. Lumbar spondylolysis. A study of natural progression in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1997 Mar-Apr;25(2):248-53. doi: 10.1177/036354659702500220.
PMID: 9079183BACKGROUNDIwamoto J, Takeda T, Wakano K. Returning athletes with severe low back pain and spondylolysis to original sporting activities with conservative treatment. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2004 Dec;14(6):346-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2004.00379.x.
PMID: 15546329BACKGROUNDChilds JD, Fritz JM, Wu SS, Flynn TW, Wainner RS, Robertson EK, Kim FS, George SZ. Implications of early and guideline adherent physical therapy for low back pain on utilization and costs. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 9;15:150. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0830-3.
PMID: 25880898BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mitchell Selhorst, DPT
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physical Therapist/Principle Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 3, 2016
First Posted
August 10, 2016
Study Start
August 1, 2016
Primary Completion
August 1, 2018
Study Completion
August 1, 2018
Last Updated
October 2, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share