Systems Addressing Frail Elders (SAFE) Care Implementation
SAFE
1 other identifier
observational
330
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Systems Addressing Frail Elders (SAFE) Care is a nurse-led interprofessional team model to rapidly identify and provide safe and effective inpatient care to high risk older adults and help support their successful transition back to the community. Developed and demonstrated to be effective in one hospital - the model is now being disseminated and studied in three additional hospitals (multiple organizational case study).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jul 2016
Typical duration for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 22, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 4, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 27, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 27, 2018
CompletedAugust 31, 2018
July 1, 2016
2.1 years
July 22, 2016
August 28, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Implementation of SAFE Care model. Decreased Length of Stay
The purpose of this project is to spread a successful model for rapidly identifying high risk vulnerable adults during an acute inpatient episode and intervening as an interprofessional team. An added purpose is to engage and promote involvement of participating hospitals' nursing research and evidence-based practice nurse experts in evaluating, adapting, and disseminating the SAFE Care model principles. We will evaluate if there is replication of the findings of the previous research (a cluster randomized controlled trial) conducted at Cedars-Sinai; that is, reduced LOS, reduced hospital complications (increased patient safety) and reduced use of ICU days. The evaluation plan for this project strongly supports collection and sharing of data on the process and outcomes of implementation of SAFE Care.
Up to 24 months
Implementation of SAFE Care model. Reduced use of ICU days
he purpose of this project is to spread a successful model for rapidly identifying high risk vulnerable adults during an acute inpatient episode and intervening as an interprofessional team. An added purpose is to engage and promote involvement of participating hospitals' nursing research and evidence-based practice nurse experts in evaluating, adapting, and disseminating the SAFE Care model principles. We will evaluate if there is replication of the findings of the previous research (a cluster randomized controlled trial) conducted at Cedars-Sinai; that is, reduced LOS, reduced hospital complications (increased patient safety) and reduced use of ICU days. The evaluation plan for this project strongly supports collection and sharing of data on the process and outcomes of implementation of SAFE Care.
Up to 24 months
Implementation of SAFE Care model. Reduced hospital complications
he purpose of this project is to spread a successful model for rapidly identifying high risk vulnerable adults during an acute inpatient episode and intervening as an interprofessional team. An added purpose is to engage and promote involvement of participating hospitals' nursing research and evidence-based practice nurse experts in evaluating, adapting, and disseminating the SAFE Care model principles. We will evaluate if there is replication of the findings of the previous research (a cluster randomized controlled trial) conducted at Cedars-Sinai; that is, reduced LOS, reduced hospital complications (increased patient safety) and reduced use of ICU days. The evaluation plan for this project strongly supports collection and sharing of data on the process and outcomes of implementation of SAFE Care.
Up to 24 months
Study Arms (3)
UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center
Site 1 (UCLA Regan Medical Center): Leaders from nursing, pharmacy, social work/case management, physician, administration, performance improvement, information systems and the Nursing Research/Evidence Based Practice Council will implement, monitor and evaluate the SAFE Care model of care. Two nursing units will be identified for staff training in screening at-risk older adults. One units will be randomly selected to initiate the SAFE Care program. The "comparison" unit staff will screen for at-risk patients and continue usual high standard of care assessments and care planning. Both units will be closely followed with formative and summative evaluation data presented for local and all-site findings.
Huntington Hospital
Site 2 (Huntington Hospital): Leaders from nursing, pharmacy, social work/case management, physician, administration, performance improvement, information systems and the Nursing Research Council/ Evidence Based Practice will implement, monitor and evaluate the SAFE Care model of care. Two nursing units will be identified for staff training in screening at-risk older adults. One units will be randomly selected to initiate the SAFE Care program. The "comparison" unit staff will screen for at-risk patients and continue usual high standard of care assessments and care planning. Both units will be closely followed with formative and summative evaluation data presented for local and all-site findings.
Torrance Memorial Hospital
Site 3 (Torrance Memorial Hospital): Leaders from nursing, pharmacy, social work/case management, physician, administration, performance improvement, information systems and the Nursing Research/ Evidence Based Practice Council will implement, monitor and evaluate the SAFE Care model of care. Two nursing units will be identified for staff training in screening at-risk older adults. One units will be randomly selected to initiate the SAFE Care program. The "comparison" unit staff will screen for at-risk patients and continue usual high standard of care assessments and care planning. Both units will be closely followed with formative and summative evaluation data presented for local and all-site findings.
Interventions
SAFE Care Model Site Intervention: 1. Endorse best practices for frail patients; 2. Identify frail patients promptly using multi-dimensional screening and assessments; 3. Employ interprofessional unit-based care team approach to frailty risk reduction during inpatient stay and create post-acute care transitions (PACT) plan recommendations; 4. Develop electronic health record templates for patient-centered interprofessional frailty notes; 5. Communicate PACT plans to primary care providers to promote safe transitions to the ambulatory setting and across the continuum of care. 6. Increase awareness, improve management of frailty, and improve overall health and well-being for adults who are frail or at risk of becoming frail.
Eligibility Criteria
This project does not have a set recruitment/enrollment goal. Process evaluation information will be collected by interview and observation of leadership and staff at three implementation sites. Quality Improvement (QI) outcome data will be collected involving elderly patients (\> 65 years) admitted to two med-surg units at each of the three collaborating sites over designated time periods: One month prior to implementation and six month after intervention. QI data from each hospital will be de-identified and submitted to core research team for analysis of patient outcomes.
You may qualify if:
- Organizational Leadership Nursing Unit Leadership/staff Adults aged 65 years
You may not qualify if:
- years and older that are on hospice protocols or dying/comfort care protocols.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Centerlead
- UniHealth Foundationcollaborator
- Ronald Reagan Medical Centercollaborator
- Huntington Hospitalcollaborator
- Torrance Memorialcollaborator
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Lianna Z Ansryan, MSN
Cedars Sinai
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- DrPH, RN, FAAN, CNE, CNO, VP of Nursing
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 22, 2016
First Posted
August 4, 2016
Study Start
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion
July 27, 2018
Study Completion
July 27, 2018
Last Updated
August 31, 2018
Record last verified: 2016-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share