Periprosthetic Fractures of the Femur Treated by Osteosynthesis
1 other identifier
observational
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Observational retrospective study on 36 consecutive patients having had surgery for a periprosthetic fracture of the femur between 2010 and 2015. The goal of the study is to test whether osteosynthesis was a secure choice at a certain age and with any type of Vancouver fracture.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jun 2016
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 3, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 23, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 23, 2020
CompletedJuly 20, 2022
July 1, 2022
4.5 years
August 1, 2016
July 19, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Age
Demographic data
Up to 2-3 days before surgery (pre-surgery radiography)
Sex
Demographic data
Up to 2-3 days before surgery (pre-surgery radiography)
Body Mass Index
Demographic data
Up to 2-3 days before surgery (pre-surgery radiography)
Prosthesis type
PTH (total hip prosthesis) or BHP (bipolar hip prosthesis)
Up to 2-3 days before surgery (pre-surgery radiography)
Type of fracture
Type of fracture according to the Vancouver International Classification
Up to 2-3 days before surgery (pre-surgery radiography)
Femoral component
Need for cement within the femur or not
Up to 2-3 days before surgery (pre-surgery radiography)
Time between 1st surgery and fracture
Time between 1st surgery and fracture
Up to 2-3 days before surgery (pre-surgery radiography)
Fracture healing
Healing status of the fracture (healed/not healed)
10 months after surgery
Mortality rate
Mortality rate (any causes)
10 months after surgery
Complications rate
Total complications rate (local + systemic + implant)
10 months after surgery
ASA score
ASA score
During surgery (up to 2 hours)
Blood loss
Blood loss during surgery
During surgery (up to 2 hours)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Laterality
Up to 2-3 days before surgery (pre-surgery radiography)
Study Arms (1)
periprosthetic fractures of the femur
periprosthetic fractures of the femur treated by osteosynthesis
Interventions
Fracture reduction and fixation with screws/plates/cables (standard of care)
Eligibility Criteria
Periprosthetic fractures of the femur treated by osteosynthesis
You may qualify if:
- Consecutive patients having had surgery between 2010 and 2015 within the CHU Brugmann hospital for a periprosthetic fracture of the femur (osteosynthesis).
You may not qualify if:
- Death during surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU Brugmann
Brussels, 1020, Belgium
Related Publications (12)
Gaski GE, Scully SP. In brief: classifications in brief: Vancouver classification of postoperative periprosthetic femur fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 May;469(5):1507-10. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1532-0. No abstract available.
PMID: 20809166BACKGROUNDDuncan CP, Haddad FS. The Unified Classification System (UCS): improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures. Bone Joint J. 2014 Jun;96-B(6):713-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B6.34040.
PMID: 24891568BACKGROUNDLindahl H, Malchau H, Oden A, Garellick G. Risk factors for failure after treatment of a periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Jan;88(1):26-30. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B1.17029.
PMID: 16365115BACKGROUNDLaurer HL, Wutzler S, Possner S, Geiger EV, El Saman A, Marzi I, Frank J. Outcome after operative treatment of Vancouver type B1 and C periprosthetic femoral fractures: open reduction and internal fixation versus revision arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 Jul;131(7):983-9. doi: 10.1007/s00402-011-1272-y. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
PMID: 21331551BACKGROUNDLearmonth ID. The management of periprosthetic fractures around the femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Jan;86(1):13-9. No abstract available.
PMID: 14765858BACKGROUNDCorten K, Vanrykel F, Bellemans J, Frederix PR, Simon JP, Broos PL. An algorithm for the surgical treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the femur around a well-fixed femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Nov;91(11):1424-30. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B11.22292.
PMID: 19880884BACKGROUNDCapello WN, D'Antonio JA, Naughton M. Periprosthetic fractures around a cementless hydroxyapatite-coated implant: a new fracture pattern is described. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb;472(2):604-10. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3137-x.
PMID: 23836241BACKGROUNDNiikura T, Sakurai A, Oe K, Shibanuma N, Tsunoda M, Maruo A, Shoda E, Lee SY, Sakai Y, Kurosaka M. Clinical and radiological results of locking plate fixation for periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip arthroplasties: a retrospective multi-center study. J Orthop Sci. 2014 Nov;19(6):984-90. doi: 10.1007/s00776-014-0622-3. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
PMID: 25145998BACKGROUNDChoo SK, Kim Y, Shin MJ, Oh HK. Conservative treatment after failure of internal fixation for periprosthetic femoral fractures: a report of two cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):773-9. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2210-1. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
PMID: 25894000BACKGROUNDBaba T, Kaneko K, Shitoto K, Futamura K, Maruyama Y. Comparison of therapeutic outcomes of periprosthetic femoral fracture between treatments employing locking and conventional plates. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013 May;23(4):437-41. doi: 10.1007/s00590-012-1005-0. Epub 2012 May 17.
PMID: 23412148BACKGROUNDMuller FJ, Galler M, Fuchtmeier B. Clinical and radiological results of patients treated with orthogonal double plating for periprosthetic femoral fractures. Int Orthop. 2014 Dec;38(12):2469-72. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2464-1. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
PMID: 25109478BACKGROUNDMoloney GB, Westrick ER, Siska PA, Tarkin IS. Treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures around a well-fixed hip arthroplasty implant: span the whole bone. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Jan;134(1):9-14. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1883-6. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
PMID: 24253261BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dragos Schiopu, MD
CHU Brugmann
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tamas Illes, MD
CHU Brugmann
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of clinic
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 1, 2016
First Posted
August 3, 2016
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion
November 23, 2020
Study Completion
November 23, 2020
Last Updated
July 20, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07