The Effects of Scalp Block on Haemodynamic Response and Postoperative Pain in Posterior Fossa Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
45
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study evaluate the effects of scalp block versus local infiltration on haemodynamic response to head pin replacement and skin incision and postoperative analgesia in posterior fossa surgery
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Apr 2014
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 26, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 2, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedAugust 22, 2017
August 1, 2017
2.7 years
July 26, 2016
August 18, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Heart rate response to head pin replacement and skin incision
heart rates (beats per minute) will be recorded before induction, before block, before head pinning, head pinning, head pin 5. and 10. minutes, skin incision
Intraoperative
Systolic arterial pressure response to head pin replacement and skin incision
Systolic arterial pressures (mmHg) will be recorded in before induction, before block, before head pinning, head pinning, head pin 5. and 10. minutes, skin incision
Intraoperative
Diastolic arterial pressure response to head pin replacement and skin incision
Diastolic arterial pressures (mmHg) will be recorded before induction, before block, before head pinning, head pinning, head pin 5. and 10. minutes, skin incision
Intraoperative
mean arterial pressure response to head pin replacement and skin incision
Mean arterial pressures (mmHg) will be recorded in will be recorded before induction, before block, before head pinning, head pinning, head pin 5. and 10. minutes, skin incision
Intraoperative
Secondary Outcomes (2)
postoperative pain
30. minute, 1.,2.,6.,12.,24. hours pain scores (visual analogue score=VAS)
morphine consumption
30. minute, 1.,2.,6.,12.,24. hours
Study Arms (3)
scalp block
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn this arm, after general anesthesia, before surgery and head pin placement, scalp block will be applied. Scalp block will be performed with bupivacaine (Marcaine 5 mg/mL, 0,5% bupivacaine); nervus supraorbitalis, nervus supratrochlearis, n. auriculotemporalis, nervus zygomaticotemporalis, nervus occipitalis majoris and minoris will be bilaterally blocked with 2-3 ml bupivacaine.
local infiltration
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn this arm, after general anesthesia, before surgery, 20 ml 0,5% bupivacaine (Marcaine 5 mg/ml, 0,5% bupivacaine) will be infiltrated to head pin points and skin incision area.
control
PLACEBO COMPARATORIn this arm, neither scalp block, nor local infiltration will be performed.
Interventions
In the scalp block and local infiltration arms; bupivacaine %0,5 will be used.
End of the surgery all of the patients in 3 groups will receive morphine patient controlled analgesia (PCA) including 1mg/ml morphine. The PCA was set to administer a bolus dose of 1 mg on demand with a lockout period of 10 minutes and maximum 25 mg for 4 hours.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Posterior fossa surgery
- Preoperative GlasGow Coma Score: 15/15
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to bupivacaine
- Uncontrolled hypertension
- Coagulopathy
- Cerebrovascular disease
- Earlier craniotomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (6)
Geze S, Yilmaz AA, Tuzuner F. The effect of scalp block and local infiltration on the haemodynamic and stress response to skull-pin placement for craniotomy. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Apr;26(4):298-303. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32831aedb2.
PMID: 19262392RESULTHansen MS, Brennum J, Moltke FB, Dahl JB. Pain treatment after craniotomy: where is the (procedure-specific) evidence? A qualitative systematic review. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Dec;28(12):821-9. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834a0255.
PMID: 21971206RESULTVerchere E, Grenier B, Mesli A, Siao D, Sesay M, Maurette P. Postoperative pain management after supratentorial craniotomy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2002 Apr;14(2):96-101. doi: 10.1097/00008506-200204000-00002.
PMID: 11907388RESULTJellish WS, Leonetti JP, Sawicki K, Anderson D, Origitano TC. Morphine/ondansetron PCA for postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting after skull base surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Aug;135(2):175-81. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.02.027.
PMID: 16890064RESULTIrefin SA, Schubert A, Bloomfield EL, DeBoer GE, Mascha EJ, Ebrahim ZY. The effect of craniotomy location on postoperative pain and nausea. J Anesth. 2003;17(4):227-31. doi: 10.1007/s00540-003-0182-8.
PMID: 14625709RESULTSchessel DA, Nedzelski JM, Rowed D, Feghali JG. Pain after surgery for acoustic neuroma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992 Sep;107(3):424-9. doi: 10.1177/019459989210700314.
PMID: 1408229RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Yusuf Tunali, Professor
Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty Department Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Staff anesthesiologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 26, 2016
First Posted
August 2, 2016
Study Start
April 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
August 22, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08