Attentional Bias Modification Through Eye-tracker Methodology (ABMET)
ABMET
Changes in Selective Attentional Patterns Towards Emotional Stimuli by Using Eye-tracking Techniques: A New Intervention for Depression
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cognitive biases are a hallmark of depression but there is scarce research on whether these biases can be directly modified by using specific cognitive training techniques. The aim of this study will be targeting and modifying specifically relevant attention biases in participants with subclinical depression using eye-tracking methodologies. This innovative approach has been proposed as a promising future line of intervention in Attention Bias Modification procedures (Koster \& Hoorelbeke, 2015). Recent findings suggest that depression is characterized by a double attentional bias (Duque \& Vazquez, 2015), More specifically, depressed individuals have difficulties both to disengage from negative materials (e.g., sad faces) and to engage with positive materials (e.g., happy faces). Thus, training procedures to change attentional biases should target these two separate components.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 22, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 28, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 28, 2017
CompletedOctober 10, 2018
October 1, 2018
1 year
July 22, 2016
October 9, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Assessment of current mood (PANAS)
A scale measuring current general positive and negative mood
Change from Baseline to the end of the 2-day intervention.It will be administered 12 min before the first session of training and then immediately after finishing the 2nd session of training
Assessment of current mood (EVEA)
A scale measuring current anger, happiness, anxiety and depressed mood
Change from Baseline to the end of the 2-day intervention. It will be administered 12 min before the first session of training and then immediately after finishing the 2nd session of training.
Attentional Bias Assessment Task (ABA, Sanchez et al., 2013)
An eye-tracking task to measure gaze patterns towards emotional faces
Change from Baseline to the end of the 2-day intervention. It will be administered immediately before the first session of training and then 5 min after finishing the 2nd session of training
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Beck Depression Inventory-II
Change from Baseline to the end of the 2-day intervention. It will be administered 20 min before the first session of training and then 20 min after finishing the 2nd session of training
Beck Anxiety Inventory
Change from Baseline to the end of the 2-day intervention. It will be administered 20 min before the first session of training and then 20 min after finishing the 2nd session of training.
Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS)
Change from Baseline to the end of the 2-day intervention. It will be administered 20 min before the first session of training and then 20 min after finishing the 2nd session of training
White Bear Suppression Inventory (WBSI)
Change from Baseline to the end of the 2-day intervention. It will be administered 20 min before the first session of training and then 20 min after finishing the 2nd session of training.
Behavioral Activation System (BAS)- Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS) Scale
Change from Baseline to the end of the 2-day intervention. It will be administered 20 min before the first session of training and then 20 min after finishing the 2nd session of training.
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Emotional Threshold Detection Task (ETDT).
Change from Baseline to the end of the 2-day intervention. It will be administered 15 min before the first session of training and then 15 min after finishing the 2nd session of training
Anagram Stress Task (AST)
Immediately after the intervention (i.e., after finishing the 2nd session of training). It will be administered 30 min after finishing the 2nd session of training
Study Arms (2)
Gaze training
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants are required to maintain their gaze in a given picture (e.g., a happy face), for a given time (i.e., 750ms vs 1500 ms) to advance to the next trial
Placebo intervention
PLACEBO COMPARATORUsing a matching procedure (i.e., yoked control group), participants are required to maintain their gaze in a given picture (e.g., a happy face), for the same average time that their counterparts in the Gaze training group (i.e. Experimental group)
Interventions
Participants are required to maintain their gaze in a given picture (e.g., a happy face), for a given time (i.e., 750ms vs 1500 ms) to advance to the next trial. (A total of 576 trials will be distributed in a 2-day intervention).
Participants are exposed to the same amount of time to the experimental stimuli used in the experimental group but there is no contingency between participants' gaze patterns and the end of each of the 576 trials.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A score of \>13 in the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)
You may not qualify if:
- Impaired vision
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
School of Psychology
Madrid, 28223, Spain
Related Publications (8)
Cristea IA, Kok RN, Cuijpers P. Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;206(1):7-16. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.146761.
PMID: 25561486BACKGROUNDMogoase C, David D, Koster EH. Clinical efficacy of attentional bias modification procedures: an updated meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol. 2014 Dec;70(12):1133-57. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22081. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
PMID: 24652823BACKGROUNDEmmelkamp PM. Attention bias modification: the Emperor's new suit? BMC Med. 2012 Jun 25;10:63. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-63.
PMID: 22731990BACKGROUNDMacleod C, Holmes EA. Cognitive bias modification: an intervention approach worth attending to. Am J Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;169(2):118-20. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11111682. No abstract available.
PMID: 22318791BACKGROUNDDuque A, Vazquez C. Double attention bias for positive and negative emotional faces in clinical depression: evidence from an eye-tracking study. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;46:107-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.09.005. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
PMID: 25305417BACKGROUNDSanchez A, Vazquez C, Marker C, LeMoult J, Joormann J. Attentional disengagement predicts stress recovery in depression: an eye-tracking study. J Abnorm Psychol. 2013 May;122(2):303-13. doi: 10.1037/a0031529. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
PMID: 23421524BACKGROUNDBar-Haim Y, Holoshitz Y, Eldar S, Frenkel TI, Muller D, Charney DS, Pine DS, Fox NA, Wald I. Life-threatening danger and suppression of attention bias to threat. Am J Psychiatry. 2010 Jun;167(6):694-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09070956. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
PMID: 20395400BACKGROUNDVazquez C, Blanco I, Sanchez A, McNally RJ. Attentional bias modification in depression through gaze contingencies and regulatory control using a new eye-tracking intervention paradigm: study protocol for a placebo-controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Dec 8;16(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1150-9.
PMID: 27931196DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carmelo Vazquez, Ph.D:
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Full Professor of Psychopathology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 22, 2016
First Posted
July 28, 2016
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
April 1, 2017
Study Completion
July 28, 2017
Last Updated
October 10, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share