Evaluation of the Alere i Influenza A&B Nucleic Acid Amplification Versus Xpert Flu/RSV
Prospective Evaluation of the Alere i Influenza A&B Nucleic Acid Amplification Versus Xpert Flu/RSV
1 other identifier
observational
92
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The rapid and accurate detection of influenza virus in respiratory specimens is required for optimal management of patients with acute respiratory infections. Because of the variability of the symptoms and the numerous other causes of influenza-like illness, the diagnosis of influenza cannot be made on the basis of clinical criteria alone. Thus, rapid influenza diagnostic tests have been developed such as the Alere i Influenza A\&B isothermal nucleic acid assay. Investigators prospectively evaluated the performance of the Alere i Influenza A\&B assay in comparison with the routine Xpert Flu/RSV assay.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2015
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 20, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 27, 2016
CompletedApril 27, 2023
July 1, 2016
3 months
July 20, 2016
April 26, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Assessment of change of the Length of stay in the emergency service
Will be assessed with patients of the firt group (phase 1) and the second one (With Flu Test)
Day 1
Assessment of change of Hospitalization rates
Will be assessed with patients of the firt group (phase 1) and the second one (With Flu Test)
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Assessments of change of antibiotic treatment Costs
Day1
Study Arms (2)
Group with support that will be usually performed
During the first phase ("before"), the assumption will be that usually achieved. The doctor continues to support according to information it has and according to good practice and service protocols.
Group with a flu test
During the second phase ("after"), a flu test is routinely performed within the home emergency department by the doctor who supports the patient. The doctor continues to support according to information it has and according to good practice and service protocols.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
adult patients (\> 18 years) consultant to the ER for influenza-like illness involving
You may qualify if:
- Respiratory Symptoms include cough, dyspnea and / or
- General symptoms: headache, myalgia, asthenia, anorexia ... and / or
- Acute fever above 38 ° C
- Patient consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Major cognitive disorders
- Patient under guardianship
- Patient refusing to consent to research
- Duplicate (patients who have had laboratory diagnosis of influenza in previous 7 days)
- Patient not receiving social security
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph
Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75014, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
TRABATTONI Eloïse, MD
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 20, 2016
First Posted
July 27, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
April 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 27, 2023
Record last verified: 2016-07