Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction and Shade Matching of Vita Suprinity Versus Lithium Disilicate (E-max) Ceramic Crowns in Esthetic Zone

NCT02846116 | Unknown DMC

• 1 other identifier: CEBD-2016-7-170
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 26
• Locations: 0 countries
• Sites: N/A

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate using of new ceramic material Vita Suprinity and lithium disilicate on patient satisfaction combined with shade matching.

Conditions

Personal Satisfaction

Keywords

all ceramic crown; Lithium disilicate; e-max; vita suprinity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Patient satisfaction using Visual Analogue scale- Binary (Satisfied or not satisfied)

  1 year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• Shade matchUsing the modified United States Public Health Service criteria (Modified USPHS)- categorical

  1 year

Study Arms (2)

lithium disilicate

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The intervention will be: Prosthetic crown

Other: Prosthetic crown

Vita suprinity

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The intervention will be: Prosthetic crown

Other: Prosthetic crown

Interventions

Prosthetic crown OTHER

Also known as: all ceramic crown

Vita suprinity; lithium disilicate

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 20 Years - 60 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• Age range of the patients from 20-60 years old; able to read and sign the informed consent document, illiterate patient will be avoided.
• Patients able physically and psychologically to tolerate conventional restorative procedures.
• Patients with no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, having teeth with good restorations.
• Patients with teeth problems indicated for full coverage restoration (e.g. mild to moderate discoloration, coronal fracture where partial coverage would lack retention, malposed or malformed teeth).
• Patients with root canal treated teeth requiring full coverage restorations.
• Patients willing to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation.

You may not qualify if:

• Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth.
• Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation.
• Pregnant women's to avoid any complication that may occur in dental office due to pregnancy or due to injected anesthetic solution.
• Patients with psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectation (patient that has phobia from dental treatments or needle bunch).
• Patients have no opposite occluding dentition in the area intended for restoration.
• Patients suffer from parafunctional habits.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Cairo University: lead

Related Publications (10)

• Tin-Oo MM, Saddki N, Hassan N. Factors influencing patient satisfaction with dental appearance and treatments they desire to improve aesthetics. BMC Oral Health. 2011 Feb 23;11:6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-11-6.

  PMID: 21342536 BACKGROUND

• Batson ER, Cooper LF, Duqum I, Mendonca G. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Oct;112(4):770-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 Jun 28.

  PMID: 24980739 BACKGROUND

• John MT, Slade GD, Szentpetery A, Setz JM. Oral health-related quality of life in patients treated with fixed, removable, and complete dentures 1 month and 6 to 12 months after treatment. Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Sep-Oct;17(5):503-11.

  PMID: 15543905 BACKGROUND

• Grossmann AC, Hassel AJ, Schilling O, Lehmann F, Koob A, Rammelsberg P. Treatment with double crown-retained removable partial dentures and oral health-related quality of life in middle- and high-aged patients. Int J Prosthodont. 2007 Nov-Dec;20(6):576-8.

  PMID: 18069364 BACKGROUND

• Corciolani G, Vichi A, Louca C, Ferrari M. Color match of two different ceramic systems to selected shades of one shade guide. J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Mar;105(3):171-6. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60025-5.

  PMID: 21356409 BACKGROUND

• Ishikawa-Nagai S, Yoshida A, Sakai M, Kristiansen J, Da Silva JD. Clinical evaluation of perceptibility of color differences between natural teeth and all-ceramic crowns. J Dent. 2009;37 Suppl 1:e57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.04.004. Epub 2009 Apr 18.

  PMID: 19423209 BACKGROUND

• Al-Wahadni A, Ajlouni R, Al-Omari Q, Cobb D, Dawson D. Shade-match perception of porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations: a comparison between dentist and patient. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002 Sep;133(9):1220-5; quiz 1260-1. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0363.

  PMID: 12356253 BACKGROUND

• Etman MK, Woolford MJ. Three-year clinical evaluation of two ceramic crown systems: a preliminary study. J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Feb;103(2):80-90. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60010-8.

  PMID: 20141812 BACKGROUND

• Dr Rupal J Shah1. A Study of Patient Satisfaction with Maxillary Anterior Teeth Restorations and Desirable Esthetic Treatment Options\n. IOSR J. Dent. Med. Sci. 13, 79-86 (2014).

  BACKGROUND

• Samorodnitzky-Naveh GR, Geiger SB, Levin L. Patients' satisfaction with dental esthetics. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007 Jun;138(6):805-8. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0269.

  PMID: 17545270 RESULT

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Personal Satisfaction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Study Officials

• Amina Zaki, Professor

  Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine- Cairo University

  STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Sameh Sh Abou-Steit, Master

CONTACT

+201001891010; samehabousteit@hotmail.com

Jylan El Guindy, Professor

CONTACT

+21671419; dr_jul@hotmail.com

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: DOUBLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Principal investigator, Assisstant lecturer

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: July 19, 2016
• First Posted: July 27, 2016
• Study Start: December 1, 2016
• Primary Completion: July 1, 2017
• Study Completion: July 1, 2017
• Last Updated: October 18, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-10