Perceptual Retraining to Reduce Suicide Risk
PRS
1 other identifier
interventional
13
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The study will use a prospective design consisting of three phases. The phases are:
- 1.the development of the perceptual retraining treatment (PRT),
- 2.the evaluation of the treatment's feasibility and acceptability, and
- 3.an assessment of its efficacy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2015
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 6, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 27, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 14, 2019
CompletedJanuary 14, 2019
August 1, 2017
1 year
July 6, 2016
August 30, 2017
July 31, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percent Change in Olfactory Perceptual Bias
A participant's ability to detect an array of threatening malodor in neutral dilution gradients will be tested at baseline and after the second and final intervention session (one week after baseline). Perceptual bias is calculated as the percentage of correct responses (i.e., yes or no to detecting the malodor) on an odor over 6 trials for each of the 8 odors, at 25% and 33% dilution (i.e., over 96 trials). Larger positive percentages indicate greater habituation to the malodor, and therefore a training effect toward reducing threat bias (i.e., a positive effect on intervention outcomes).
Baseline, Week 1
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change From Baseline in Mean Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) at 1 Month
Baseline, month 1
Change in Suicidal Ideation Assessed Using the Depressive Symptom Inventory - Suicidality Subscale
Baseline, month 1
Change in Beck Suicide Scale Scores From Baseline to 1 Month
Baseline, month 1
Change in the Beck Anxiety Inventory-II From Baseline to 1 Month
Baseline, month 1
Study Arms (2)
Perceptual Retraining Treatment (PRT)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe Perceptual Retraining Treatment will involve systematic presentation of diluted malodors. For each individual, vials on either side of their initial ideographic detection threshold will be presented. During the retraining, participants will be given feedback to shift their bias away from the malodorous target stimuli. For example, in the context of diluted solutions participants will be given the feedback that they are "correct" when a "neutral" response is given to solutions that are above the starting threshold (stronger malodor) and "incorrect" when a target is endorsed that is below the starting threshold (weaker malodor). Each training session will consist of 4 training blocks.
Sham Neutral Training (SNT)
PLACEBO COMPARATORApproximately half of the participants will be randomized to the SNT condition designed to control for the effects of time and learning. In the SNT condition, participants will complete the same assessments (including the olfactory bias assessment), as well as a sham training consisting of neutral/neutral odor pairing dilutions, rather than the combat/neutral odor pairings as in the PRT. Following the one-month assessment, they will be given the option to complete the PRT.
Interventions
Perceptual retraining involves the systematic presentation of diluted malodors (i.e., odors perceived as threatening). For each individual, vials on either side of a pre-determined and ideographic detection threshold will be presented. During the retraining, participants will be given feedback to shift their bias away from the malodorous target stimuli. For example, in the context of diluted solutions participants will be given the feedback that they are "correct" when a "neutral" response is given to solutions that are above the starting threshold (stronger malodor) and "incorrect" when a target is endorsed that is below the starting threshold (weaker malodor).
Control condition using systematic presentation of diluted neutral-neutral odor pairs.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- evidence of olfactory perceptual bias toward military-relevant stimuli (e.g., burning rubber, decay, fuel).
- military combat exposure in Operation Iraqi Freedom, Enduring Freedom, or New Dawn.
- Age 18-60.
You may not qualify if:
- Significant medical illness that compromises olfactory perception or tolerance (e.g., significant olfactory disease or dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, respiratory disorders, renal disease, epilepsy, stroke, and uncontrolled hypertension or migraines).
- Evidence of imminent suicidal intent
- Evidence of current or past psychotic-spectrum disorders, or uncontrolled bipolar disorder.
- English speakers.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Florida State Universitylead
- United States Department of Defensecollaborator
- Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care Systemcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Florida State University
Tallahassee, Florida, 32306, United States
Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States
Limitations and Caveats
Overall sample size was limited due to delays of project approval at the Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System site. Early terminations at the Florida State University site further lead to small numbers of subjects to be analyzed
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Wen Li
- Organization
- Florida State University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wen Li, PhD
Florida State University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laurel Franklin, PhD
Southeastern Louisiana Veterans Health Care System
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 6, 2016
First Posted
July 27, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
September 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
January 14, 2019
Results First Posted
January 14, 2019
Record last verified: 2017-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share