NCT02845700

Brief Summary

The study will use a prospective design consisting of three phases. The phases are:

  1. 1.the development of the perceptual retraining treatment (PRT),
  2. 2.the evaluation of the treatment's feasibility and acceptability, and
  3. 3.an assessment of its efficacy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
13

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2015

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2015

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 6, 2016

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 27, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2016

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 14, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

January 14, 2019

Status Verified

August 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

July 6, 2016

Results QC Date

August 30, 2017

Last Update Submit

July 31, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percent Change in Olfactory Perceptual Bias

    A participant's ability to detect an array of threatening malodor in neutral dilution gradients will be tested at baseline and after the second and final intervention session (one week after baseline). Perceptual bias is calculated as the percentage of correct responses (i.e., yes or no to detecting the malodor) on an odor over 6 trials for each of the 8 odors, at 25% and 33% dilution (i.e., over 96 trials). Larger positive percentages indicate greater habituation to the malodor, and therefore a training effect toward reducing threat bias (i.e., a positive effect on intervention outcomes).

    Baseline, Week 1

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Change From Baseline in Mean Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) at 1 Month

    Baseline, month 1

  • Change in Suicidal Ideation Assessed Using the Depressive Symptom Inventory - Suicidality Subscale

    Baseline, month 1

  • Change in Beck Suicide Scale Scores From Baseline to 1 Month

    Baseline, month 1

  • Change in the Beck Anxiety Inventory-II From Baseline to 1 Month

    Baseline, month 1

Study Arms (2)

Perceptual Retraining Treatment (PRT)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The Perceptual Retraining Treatment will involve systematic presentation of diluted malodors. For each individual, vials on either side of their initial ideographic detection threshold will be presented. During the retraining, participants will be given feedback to shift their bias away from the malodorous target stimuli. For example, in the context of diluted solutions participants will be given the feedback that they are "correct" when a "neutral" response is given to solutions that are above the starting threshold (stronger malodor) and "incorrect" when a target is endorsed that is below the starting threshold (weaker malodor). Each training session will consist of 4 training blocks.

Behavioral: Perceptual Retraining Treatment

Sham Neutral Training (SNT)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Approximately half of the participants will be randomized to the SNT condition designed to control for the effects of time and learning. In the SNT condition, participants will complete the same assessments (including the olfactory bias assessment), as well as a sham training consisting of neutral/neutral odor pairing dilutions, rather than the combat/neutral odor pairings as in the PRT. Following the one-month assessment, they will be given the option to complete the PRT.

Behavioral: Sham Neutral training

Interventions

Perceptual retraining involves the systematic presentation of diluted malodors (i.e., odors perceived as threatening). For each individual, vials on either side of a pre-determined and ideographic detection threshold will be presented. During the retraining, participants will be given feedback to shift their bias away from the malodorous target stimuli. For example, in the context of diluted solutions participants will be given the feedback that they are "correct" when a "neutral" response is given to solutions that are above the starting threshold (stronger malodor) and "incorrect" when a target is endorsed that is below the starting threshold (weaker malodor).

Perceptual Retraining Treatment (PRT)

Control condition using systematic presentation of diluted neutral-neutral odor pairs.

Sham Neutral Training (SNT)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • evidence of olfactory perceptual bias toward military-relevant stimuli (e.g., burning rubber, decay, fuel).
  • military combat exposure in Operation Iraqi Freedom, Enduring Freedom, or New Dawn.
  • Age 18-60.

You may not qualify if:

  • Significant medical illness that compromises olfactory perception or tolerance (e.g., significant olfactory disease or dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, respiratory disorders, renal disease, epilepsy, stroke, and uncontrolled hypertension or migraines).
  • Evidence of imminent suicidal intent
  • Evidence of current or past psychotic-spectrum disorders, or uncontrolled bipolar disorder.
  • English speakers.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Florida State University

Tallahassee, Florida, 32306, United States

Location

Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System

New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States

Location

Limitations and Caveats

Overall sample size was limited due to delays of project approval at the Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System site. Early terminations at the Florida State University site further lead to small numbers of subjects to be analyzed

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Wen Li
Organization
Florida State University

Study Officials

  • Wen Li, PhD

    Florida State University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Laurel Franklin, PhD

    Southeastern Louisiana Veterans Health Care System

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2016

First Posted

July 27, 2016

Study Start

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion

September 1, 2016

Study Completion

September 1, 2016

Last Updated

January 14, 2019

Results First Posted

January 14, 2019

Record last verified: 2017-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations