NCT02845258

Brief Summary

Patients may evolve pseudocysts of the pancreas secondary to a severe pancreatitis. In case of a symptomatic or infected pseudocyst, a therapeutic drainage of the cyst is indicated. In modern medicine the preferred way to perform such a drainage is by the means of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). It is not precisely elucidated how this EUS-procedure should be performed in different scenarios. The cyst appearance and the drainage stents and/or technique may impact the clinical outcome. This study is a prospective, single-center observational study on the outcome after EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2006

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2006

Completed
10.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 20, 2016

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 27, 2016

Completed
5.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2021

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

April 28, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

15.8 years

First QC Date

July 20, 2016

Last Update Submit

April 27, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Short time complication rate

    The number of EUS-procedure-related complications such as bleeding, infection and death.

    Uo to 48 hours

  • Repeated drainage frequency

    A successful drainage means no need for additional drainage procedures. The need for a repeated drainage is to be regarded as a therapeutic failure. The number of repeated procedures due to the need for additional drainage is recorded.

    Up to 3 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Hospital stay

    Up to 30 days

  • Long time complication rate

    Up to 6 months

Interventions

Pancreatic pseudocyst drainage with a plastic or self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS): This procedure is to be regarded as a clinical routine procedure since a couple of years back. The type of stent (material? length? thickness?), the cyst appearance (large? infected? cyst wall thickness?) and the type of access (transgastric? transduodenal?) may however vary from patient to patient. In this study we perform EUS-drainage using different types of equipment on a wide range of pancreatic pseudocysts of different appearance and character. All procedures are performed as recommended. The very aim of the study is to investigate which technique and Equipment is to be preferred in different scenarios.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

All patients \>18 years referred to the Sahlgrenska University hospital for the performance of an EUS-guided pancreatic pseudocyst drainage

You may qualify if:

  • All patients \>18 years referred to the Sahlgrenska University hospital for the performance of an EUS-guided pancreatic pseudocyst drainage

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients unwilling to participate or unable to understand or sign the informed consent
  • Patients with no need for pseudocyst drainage as assessed by the endosonographer

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Endoscopy Department GEA, Sahlgrenska university Hospital

Gothenburg, S-413 45, Sweden

Location

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITH DNA

Pancreatic pseudocyst fluid aspirate for culture and biochemical analysis. No DNA analysis.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Pseudocyst

Interventions

Self Expandable Metallic Stents

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pancreatic CystCystsNeoplasmsPancreatic DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

StentsProstheses and ImplantsEquipment and Supplies

Study Officials

  • Riadh Sadik, Ass Prof

    Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2016

First Posted

July 27, 2016

Study Start

January 1, 2006

Primary Completion

October 1, 2021

Study Completion

December 1, 2024

Last Updated

April 28, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations