Regression Discontinuity Design to Evaluate of Drotrecogin Alpha Effectiveness
1 other identifier
observational
12,492
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Many health care interventions and medications found to have benefits ("efficacy") in experimental, tightly-controlled, human research trials are later found to lack real-world health benefits ("effectiveness"). Inadequate surveillance of real-world clinical effectiveness may falsely reassure clinicians and those who monitor healthcare quality, propagating unrecognized ineffective or harmful treatments at high costs to patients and society. The failure to translate potential health benefits into realized gains, or to detect unexpected harms in healthcare delivery, stems from a lack of methods with which to robustly measure real-world (in)effectiveness. Current methods to detect changes in outcomes 'before and after' implementation may be biased by secular trends in healthcare practice and outcomes; other methods to compare outcomes for treated and untreated patients may be biased by unmeasured factors. The current project aims to develop and demonstrate - as a proof-of-concept - the use of a quasi-experimental research method called 'regression discontinuity design (RDD)' in surveillance of real-world clinical effectiveness. RDD had previously found use in the evaluation of educational programs in which students scoring below a threshold were assigned an intervention. The US Department of Education considers RDD designs to have quality similar to randomized trials.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2002
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 15, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 26, 2016
CompletedJuly 26, 2016
July 1, 2016
3 years
July 15, 2016
July 21, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Relative risk reduction for mortality
The study will evaluate the change in the relationship between APACHE II scores and hospital mortality rate at the APACHE II threshold score of 25
Duration of hospitalization, on average approximately 14 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
APACHE II scores at which drotrecogin alpha was used
Baseline
Change in mortality risk over time
3 years
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
An International Observational Study Among Severe Sepsis Patients Treated in the Intensive Care Unit (PROGRESS severe sepsis registry). The PROGRESS registry of severe sepsis cases is a unique resource that contains data linking APACHE scores, drotrecogin alpha administration, and hospital mortality outcomes, providing an opportunity to study RDD as a novel method of comparative effectiveness research, and compare results derived from RDD to prior studies using more traditional comparative effectiveness designs (i.e., propensity score adjustment).
You may qualify if:
- Included in PROGRESS severe sepsis registry
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Boston Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118, United States
Related Publications (3)
Martin G, Brunkhorst FM, Janes JM, Reinhart K, Sundin DP, Garnett K, Beale R. The international PROGRESS registry of patients with severe sepsis: drotrecogin alfa (activated) use and patient outcomes. Crit Care. 2009;13(3):R103. doi: 10.1186/cc7936. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
PMID: 19566927BACKGROUNDBeale R, Reinhart K, Brunkhorst FM, Dobb G, Levy M, Martin G, Martin C, Ramsey G, Silva E, Vallet B, Vincent JL, Janes JM, Sarwat S, Williams MD; PROGRESS Advisory Board. Promoting Global Research Excellence in Severe Sepsis (PROGRESS): lessons from an international sepsis registry. Infection. 2009 Jun;37(3):222-32. doi: 10.1007/s15010-008-8203-z. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
PMID: 19404580BACKGROUNDWalkey AJ, Bor J. Risk-based Heterogeneity of Treatment Effect in Trials and Implications for Surveillance of Clinical Effectiveness Using Regression Discontinuity Designs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Dec 1;192(11):1399. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201508-1533LE. No abstract available.
PMID: 26623693BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 15, 2016
First Posted
July 26, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2002
Primary Completion
December 1, 2005
Last Updated
July 26, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) is only available through consultation with the original PROGRESS registry study sponsor through https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com/