A CLinical Study to Evaluate the Safety And Effectiveness of the CeRene DevIce to Treat HeavY Menstrual Bleeding
CLARITY
1 other identifier
interventional
242
3 countries
12
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Cerene Cryotherapy Device in reducing menstrual bleeding in women with heavy menstrual bleeding (menorrhagia) due to benign causes for whom child bearing is complete.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 21, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 25, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 6, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2020
CompletedJanuary 5, 2021
December 1, 2020
2 years
July 21, 2016
April 25, 2019
December 9, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Primary Safety Endpoint: Number of Serious Adverse Events and Serious Device-related Adverse Events
12 months
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: Number of Subjects With Reduction in Menstrual Bleeding to PBLAC Score of ≤75
Success for the primary effectiveness endpoint was defined as reduction in menstrual bleeding to a PBLAC (Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart) score of ≤75. Scale information for PBLAC (Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart): The scale minimum is 0, which indicates amenorrhea, i.e. no bleeding. There is no scale maximum. A score of 100 indicates eumenorrhea, i.e. normal menstrual bleeding. A lower PBLAC score indicates less bleeding; a higher PBLAC score indicates more bleeding.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Dysmennorhea
12 Months
Amenorrhea
12 Months
Investigator Evaluation of the Uterine Cavity
12 Months
Investigator Assessment of Cavity Findings
12 Months
Anesthesia and Pain Medications at Treatment
Day of Treatment
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (7)
Subjects' Report of Their Last Menstrual Period
36 months
Menstrual Impact Questionnaire
36 months
Premenstrual Symptoms Impact Survey
36 months
- +4 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Endometrial Cryoablation
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Refractory heavy menstrual bleeding with no definable organic cause
- Female subject age 25 to 50 years, inclusive
- Sounded length of uterine cavity no greater than 10 cm and endometrial cavity no greater than 6.5 cm
- Sufficient myometrial thickness
- Documented excessive menstrual blood loss within 3 months of informed consent
- Premenopausal confirmed by follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) measurement
- Agrees to use a reliable form of contraception following ablation treatment
- Provides written informed consent using a form that has been approved by the reviewing ethics committee
- Agrees to follow-up exams and data collection requirements
- Demonstrates an understanding of how to record menstrual blood loss using a menstrual pictogram
- Has predictable, cyclic menstrual cycles
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or has a desire to conceive
- Endometrial hyperplasia as confirmed by histology
- Active endometritis
- Active pelvic inflammatory disease
- Active sexually transmitted disease (STD)
- Presence of bacteremia, sepsis, or other active systemic infection
- Active infection of the genitals, vagina, cervix, or uterus
- Known/suspected abdominal, pelvic, or gynecological malignancy within the past 5 years
- Known clotting defects or bleeding disorders
- Abnormal cytology on Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing not treated according to local standards.
- Prior uterine surgery that interrupts the integrity of the uterine wall (e.g., transmural myomectomy or classical cesarean section).
- Previous low transverse cesarean section where the myometrial wall thickness is insufficient
- Previous endometrial ablation procedure
- Clinically significant adenomyosis indicated by subject complaints, imaging, or clinician's judgment
- Presence of an implantable contraceptive device
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (12)
WomanCare PC
Arlington Heights, Illinois, 60004, United States
The Advance Gynecologic Surgery Institute
Naperville, Illinois, 60540, United States
Women's Health Advantage
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46825, United States
Basinski LLC
Newburgh, Indiana, 47630, United States
Asheville Women's Medical Center
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801, United States
Seven Hills Women's Health
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45231, United States
Amy Brenner MD and Associates, LLC
Mason, Ohio, 45040, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
Premier Clinical Research
Spokane, Washington, 99202, United States
Allan Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T2J 7G9, Canada
LaSalle Hospital
LaSalle, Quebec, H8P 1C1, Canada
Hospital Universitario de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo Leon
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 66460, Mexico
Related Publications (3)
Curlin HL, Anderson TL. Endometrial Cryoablation for the Treatment of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: 36-Month Outcomes from the CLARITY Study. Int J Womens Health. 2022 Aug 10;14:1083-1092. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S371044. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35983177DERIVEDCurlin H, Cholkeri-Singh A, Leal JGG, Anderson T. Hysteroscopic Access and Uterine Cavity Evaluation 12 Months after Endometrial Ablation with the Cerene Cryotherapy Device. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Mar;29(3):440-447. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.11.016. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
PMID: 34839060DERIVEDCurlin HL, Cintron LC, Anderson TL. A Prospective, Multicenter, Clinical Trial Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the Cerene Device to Treat Heavy Menstrual Bleeding. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Apr;28(4):899-908. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.08.013. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
PMID: 32835865DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical and Regulatory Affairs
- Organization
- Channel Medsystems
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 21, 2016
First Posted
July 25, 2016
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
April 1, 2018
Study Completion
May 1, 2020
Last Updated
January 5, 2021
Results First Posted
June 6, 2019
Record last verified: 2020-12