Optimizing the Assessment of Refractive Outcomes After Cataract Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
162
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate current available assessments (automated vs. manual) with which manifest refraction data and biometric variables are obtained to understand if data from an automated refractor can be utilized to optimize the A-constant as well as manual subjective refraction (ie, to a clinically insignificant difference). The A-constant is the calculated number that helps the surgeon determine which IOL should be implanted in the eye during cataract surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 14, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 21, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 16, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 16, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 8, 2019
CompletedJanuary 8, 2019
November 1, 2018
1.2 years
July 14, 2016
November 12, 2018
December 19, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
IOL A-constant at 3 Months at Each Site
The A-constant, is a type of IOL constant, that accounts for clinical variables that may affect the refractive outcome (e.g. patient factors, biometry method). It relates the power of the IOL to axial length and corneal measurements. It is specific to the design of the IOL, style, and placement within the eye. The optimization of the A-constant is fundamental to achieving the targeted refractive outcomes, offset any observed error and for ensuring high patient satisfaction following cataract surgery. Since errors/noise from refraction plays a significant role in A-constant optimization, it is important to determine if an automated method has any advantages over conventional manifest refraction. A-constants based on autorefraction and manifest refraction for the study eye are compared for each subject. The mean difference between the two methods cannot be greater than 0.15 D at each of the three study centers for the methods to be considered equivalent.
Month 3 (Day 80-100) Post Study Eye Implantation
Study Arms (1)
Manifest refraction
OTHERManifest refraction performed by autorefraction (automated) and manual procedures (standard). Subject implanted with ACRYSOF® IQ Monofocal IOL Model SN60WF. Autorefraction performed by Topcon® KR-1W Wave-Front Analyzer.
Interventions
Manifest refraction performed by autorefraction (automated) and manual procedures (standard)
Monofocal IOL implanted for long-term use over the lifetime of the cataract patient
Wavefront and topography system used to obtain autorefraction data
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Able to understand and sign an Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board approved Informed Consent;
- Willing and able to attend all scheduled study visits as required per protocol;
- Diagnosed with cataract in one or both eyes;
- Planned cataract removal by phacoemulsification with implantation of a monofocal IOL; laser refractive procedures for incisions (primary and sideport), capsulorhexis and lens fragmentation are allowed;
- Preoperative keratometric astigmatism ≤ 1.0 diopter (D);
You may not qualify if:
- Women of childbearing potential, pregnant, or breast-feeding;
- History of ocular pathology, ocular inflammation, or ocular conditions, as specified in the protocol;
- Previous intraocular or corneal surgery;
- Use of systemic medications that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may confound the outcome or increase the risk of complications to the subject;
- Any medical condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may confound the results of this study, prohibit the completion of the study assessments, or increase the risk for the subject;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Alcon Researchlead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Global Brand Affairs Lead, CDMA Surgical
- Organization
- Alcon, A Novartis Division
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Alcon, A Novartis Division
Alcon, A Novartis Division
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 14, 2016
First Posted
July 22, 2016
Study Start
September 21, 2016
Primary Completion
November 16, 2017
Study Completion
November 16, 2017
Last Updated
January 8, 2019
Results First Posted
January 8, 2019
Record last verified: 2018-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share