PerClot Compared to Usual Care in Gynaecology Procedures
A Prospective, Multi-Centre, Randomized, Safety and Effectiveness Study of PerClot Compared to Usual Care When Used During Gynaecology Procedures
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is a post market, multi-centre, randomised study evaluating PerClot compared to usual care. PerClot is a CE marked device and is currently used as a haemostat in gynaecological surgery throughout Europe. The purpose of this study is to collect additional post market data on its use in this indication.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 31, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 18, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2017
CompletedSeptember 1, 2017
July 1, 2016
1.7 years
July 31, 2015
August 31, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
achievement of haemostasis (yes/no).
visual observation of cessation of bleeding
measured up to 10 minutes after application
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Absence of re-intervention for post-operative bleeding
within 30 days of initial surgery
Other Outcomes (2)
Absence of proven infection
within 30 days of initial surgery
Absence of bleeding related adverse events
within 30 days of initial surgery
Study Arms (2)
PerClot
ACTIVE COMPARATORPerClot® Polysaccharide Hemostatic System (PerClot) is a medical device composed of absorbable polysaccharide particles (AMPs) and delivery applicators. Investigators will have the option to choose 3g or 5g dependent on the requirements of the patient
Usual Care
ACTIVE COMPARATORUsual care will consist of any other haemostat the Investigator would normally use in the control of bleeding i.e arista, Floseal, surgical, surgiflo. If the Investigator would not normally use a haemostat to control bleeding then electrocautery or diathermy may be used in this arm
Interventions
Haemostatic device for the control of bleeding from capillary, venous or arteriolar vessels by pressure, ligature or other conventional means is either ineffective or impractical.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject is ≥ 18 years of age
- Subject is undergoing gynecological procedure
- Subject is willing and able to comply with the protocol and follow up period
- Subject is willing and able to give written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Subject with a history of pelvic or abdominal radiotherapy (within 8 weeks)
- Subject is pregnant or actively breastfeeding
- Subject has a ruptured ectopic pregnancy
- Subject has a medical history of abnormal coagulopathy or bleeding
- Subject has a sensitivity to starch or starch derived materials
- Subject has active or potential infection at the surgical site
- Subject is currently enrolled in another study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- CryoLife Europalead
Study Sites (1)
Bellvitge Hospital
Barcelona, 08907, Spain
Related Publications (1)
Ponce J, Garcia-Tejedor A, Barahona M, Cappuccio S, Costantini B, Fedele C, Marti-Cardona L, Scambia G. Effectiveness and safety of an absorbable modified polymer starch powder hemostat versus usual care in gynecology procedures: A prospective, multi-center, and randomized study. PLoS One. 2025 Sep 11;20(9):e0331376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331376. eCollection 2025.
PMID: 40934160DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2015
First Posted
July 18, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2015
Primary Completion
July 1, 2017
Study Completion
August 1, 2017
Last Updated
September 1, 2017
Record last verified: 2016-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share