Accuracy and Precision of Different Devices for the Monitoring of Pulsed Oxygen Saturation
PULSEREA
1 other identifier
observational
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hypoxemia is a frequent situation in clinical practice, particularly in intensive care units or perioperative. The mortality and morbidity increase for cardiovascular reason, due to hypoxia has been reported several times. It is therefore important to detect hypoxemia very early and with accuracy. The objective is to correct the causes quickly and thus avoid or minimize complications. In addition to the risks associated with hypoxemia, the monitoring of Arterial Oxygen Saturation also avoids the adverse effects associated with hyperoxia. Indeed oxygen leads to the formation of free radicals, which in physiological condition are regulated by antioxidant mechanisms. However, in anesthesiology, it is common to find pathological situations (acute respiratory distress syndrome, shock, prolonged inflammatory state) where these regulatory mechanisms are overwhelmed. Oxygen administration to supra-physiological concentrations leads to a formation of excessive free radicals, aggravating the existing injury (including lung). Oxygen therapy is a fully-fledged treatment requiring monitoring of its effectiveness and tolerance. Currently, the standard method for assessing oxygenation is the arterial blood gas analysis with the Arterial Oxygen Saturation. Its cost and the need for an arterial blood sample do not allow regular monitoring. Clinical evaluation of hypoxia is completely unreliable. there is a third method : monitoring devices that measure Arterial Pulsed Oxygen Saturation, called "pulse oximeters." Pulse oximeters have become an integral and mandatory part of the standard monitoring. It is through the measurement of Arterial Pulsed Oxygen Saturation, supposed to reflect Arterial Oxygen Saturation, that clinicians guide their therapeutic attitudes to optimize oxygenation and improve the prognosis of patients. So pulse oximetry is a method considered reliable and especially non-invasive. It is less expensive and does not require blood sampling. These qualities explain why these devices are easily used in anesthesia, intensive care and in emergency situations. However, several studies have demonstrated the inaccuracy of Arterial Pulsed Oxygen Saturation in frequent situations resuscitation (shock, sepsis, dark skin type). Thus, it is necessary to objectify the benefits and limitations of pulse oximetry to optimize their use, especially in these situations of high risk, where a discrepancy between the values measured by the pulse oximetry and measurement of arterial blood saturation with oxygen gas can be detrimental. It exists several pulse oximetry devices, whose accuracy seems unequal, which necessitates a comparative study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Feb 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 20, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 20, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 14, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedMay 11, 2017
May 1, 2017
1.8 years
June 20, 2016
May 10, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry monitoring accuracy
determine the accuracy of oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry monitoring devices (SpO2) compared to the reference method, arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) by blood gas on Co-Oximeter
at each arterial blood gas during ICU hospitalization (max 5 punctures from inclusion to ICU discharge - average of 1 week)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of participants for whom there will be mismatch between SpO2 (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry) and SaO2 (arterial oxygen saturation) measures with medical adverse events (vasopressors, hypoxemia, acidosis, alkalosis)
at each arterial blood gas during ICU hospitalization (max 5 punctures from inclusion to ICU discharge - average of 1 week)
Interventions
For each monitoring of Arterial Oxygen Saturation, measures of Arterial Pulsed Oxygen Saturation will be made for each pulse oximeter.
Eligibility Criteria
General population of Intensive Care Unit
You may qualify if:
- Hospitalization in intensive care
- Over 18 years
- Continuous monitoring of oxygen saturation
- Susceptible oo have arterial blood gases and carrying an arterial catheter
You may not qualify if:
- patient protected by the law
- no social security number
- carbon monoxide Intoxication
- High methemoglobinemia.
- Therapeutic limitation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Service de Réanimation Chirurgicale
Angers, 49933, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CROSSOVER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 20, 2016
First Posted
July 14, 2016
Study Start
February 20, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
May 11, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05