Comparative Effects of Two Anesthetic Techniques on Auditory Brain Response in Children
1 other identifier
observational
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This will be a prospective, blinded, cross-over study to compare the effects of two anesthetic techniques on the interpretability of auditory brainstem response testing in children.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jun 2016
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 29, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 27, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 27, 2018
CompletedJuly 2, 2021
June 1, 2021
2.5 years
June 29, 2016
June 30, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Qualitative interpretability of ABR testing in the same patient undergoing two anesthetic techniques
This will be measured by a blinded panel of audiologist review the two ABR click test results and provide judgment at each intensity level, for each ear and whether or not a response is present.
Participants will be followed for the duration of the ABR test approximately 60 - 90 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Amplitude of Wave V of the ABR after broadband click stimulus
Participants will be followed for the duration of the ABR test approximately 60 - 90 minutes
Latency of Wave V of the ABR after broadband click stimulus
Participants will be followed for the duration of the ABR test approximately 60 - 90 minutes
Eligibility Criteria
Patients will be recruited from the radiology ABR schedule
You may qualify if:
- years old
- ASA status I, II, or III
- Scheduled for ABR with general anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication to sevoflurane or propofol
- ASA \>3
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45339, United States
Related Publications (1)
Kandil AI, Ok MS, Baroch KA, Subramanyam R, Mahmoud MA, McAuliffe JJ 3rd. Why a Propofol Infusion Should Be the Anesthetic of Choice for Auditory Brainstem Response Testing in Children. Anesth Analg. 2022 Apr 1;134(4):802-809. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005693.
PMID: 35113042DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ali Kandil, DO
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CROSSOVER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 29, 2016
First Posted
July 13, 2016
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion
November 27, 2018
Study Completion
November 27, 2018
Last Updated
July 2, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share