Metastatic Tumor Research and Outcomes Network
MTRON
1 other identifier
observational
960
10 countries
24
Brief Summary
The registry aims to collect patient information such as patient demographics, co-morbidities, clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic data, as well as information on adverse events and HRQOL outcomes specific for patients with metastatic spine tumor(s).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Nov 2017
Longer than P75 for all trials
24 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 21, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 12, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 15, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 15, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 15, 2026
February 25, 2026
November 1, 2025
8.8 years
June 21, 2016
February 24, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (15)
Patient details
The following patient data will be collected: * gender, year of birth, height, weight, race * work status, education level, marital status * smoking, alcohol and recreational drug use * medication use * nutrition and vitamin intake * presence of osteoporosis * comorbidities according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index - CCI
collected at baseline
Tumor details
Primary cancer * Site of the primary cancer * Year of diagnosis * Status of the tumor (removed completely, partially, or not removed) * Signs of local control or tumor progression * Tumor subtype * Tumor markers Spine metastases * Date of initial diagnosis of spine metastases * Identification of index target * Vertebral location (i.e., C1, T3-T5, etc.) * Details of spine metastases and other metastases, if any * Activity of systemic metastases * Local control of metastatic tumor * Presence of pathologic fracture * Radiographic evidence of new spine metastatic disease
collected at baseline, first prospective treatment and follow-up
Symptoms
For patients with metastatic spine tumor, it is important to understand the occurrence, location, and type of pain patients have at baseline and at follow-up visits. Pain symptoms assessed by the physician will therefore be collected in addition to the pain specific PROs. Bowel and bladder function will be assessed by the physician.
collected at baseline, first prospective treatment and follow-up
Treatment details - previous treatment of the index of the spine
If the patient had previous treatment (surgery, radiation or systemic oncologic therapy) for the index target, the following information about the previous treatment will be collected at baseline: * Type(s) of treatment * Date(s) of treatment * Treated vertebrae level(s) * Procedure details * Hospital/center where the treatment was administered * ASIA impairment scale (applies only to previous surgical patients)
Collected at baseline
Imaging information
Skeletal muscle and adipose tissue measurements will be made from CT scans. One transverse CT image of the inferior surface of L3 will be assessed by an independent assessor to calculate the visceral fat area to subcutaneous fat ratio (VFA/SFA ratio). This measurement will only be collected if the CT scan is according to standard of care and the method is described in a separate imaging manual. Additional CT scans will not be performed for this Registry. Imaging is critical to select the biopsy technique and for disease diagnosis. Follow-up imaging also plays an important role in monitoring disease status. Imaging data will be collected to serve as a data repository, so that images may be more easily retrieved later if necessary. Imaging data * Image type (e.g. MRI, CT, PET, etc.) * Date taken * Name of institution storing image
collected at baseline, first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
Patient reported outcomes - Euroqol EQ-5D-3L / - EQ-5D VAS
The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results into a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
collected at baseline, first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
Ambulation
Details about the ability of the patient to walk, cause of ambulation loss, use of an assistive device, and timing will be collected. 10 meter walk test (10 MWT) If the patient is able to ambulate without physical assistance (i.e. without help of a person), ambulation will be assessed by the 10MWT (walking aids are allowed). The 10MWT evaluates the time required to walk 10 meters. Patients should walk 10 meters with 2 meters for acceleration and deceleration. The patient will be timed from when the patient's toes of the leading foot cross the 2 meter line to when the patient's toes of the leading foot cross the 8 meter line. The test should be performed three times and the results will be averaged. The patient should be instructed to perform the test at a comfortable walking pace.
collected at baseline, discharge and at follow-up.
Nutritional status tool
The Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA©) sets the standard of and is the preeminent interdisciplinary patient assessment (weight, intake, symptoms, functional status, disease state, metabolic stress and nutritional physical examination) in oncology and other chronic catabolic conditions. The Scored PG-SGA© includes the four patient-generated historical components ('Weight History', 'Food Intake', 'Symptoms' and 'Activities and Function'), the professional part (Diagnosis, Age, Metabolic stress, and Physical Exam), the Global Assessment (A = well nourished, B = moderately malnourished or suspected malnutrition, C = severely malnourished), the total numerical score, and nutritional triage recommendations. Subsequently, the Scored PG-SGA© allows for triaging of specific nutrition interventions, as well as facilitating quantitative outcomes data collection. This assessment is available in a variety of languages and as a metric as well as a non-metric version.
collected at baseline, first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
Morbidity data - Adverse events
* related to surgery Intra- and postoperative complication data will be recorded for all surgically treated patients during the standard of care scheduled follow-up visits. Complications will be assessed by evaluating the patient's medical files from the time treatment was initiated until the day of follow-up. The Spine AdVerse Events Severity system, version 2 (SAVES V2) AE abstraction tool will be used to record the morbidity data. * related to radiation and/or systemic oncologic therapy For patients treated with RT and/or systemic oncologic therapy, complications and severity grade related to the treatment will be recorded during the standard of care scheduled follow-up visits according to a predefined list: The predefined list and severity grading system are according to the National Cancer Institute Guidelines.
collected at first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
Local disease recurrence data
At every FU visit, each patient, regardless of which stage they are at in their treatment, will be evaluated for local disease control. Presence or absence of local control and distant metastases should be confirmed through imaging. The timing of the assessment will be performed in accordance with local standard of care scheduled FU visits.
collected at baseline and at follow-up.
Survival
FU visits will be scheduled and performed according to the local standard of care and at each scheduled visit the patient's survival will be documented. In case a patient misses a scheduled visit it will be assessed if the patient is still alive.
collected at first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
Treatment details - Current treatment of the index target of the spine
Since there is a spectrum of different treatment options and combinations for patients with a metastatic spine tumor, detailed information about the three main treatment options (surgery, radiation, and systemic oncologic therapy) for the index target will be collected. The treatment intent, including administration (primary, neo-adjuvant, and adjuvant) will also be collected.
collected at first prospective treatment and at follow-up.
Treatment details - Current treatment for the primary cancer
Information on the status of the primary cancer as well as on ongoing treatment of the primary cancer will be collected at baseline and at follow-up.
collected at baseline, first prospective treatment and at follow-up.
Patient reported outcomes - Pain Numeric Rating Scale
The Pain NRS is an 11-point scale where the end points are the extremes of no pain (0 points), or worst imaginable pain (10 points). It measures subjective intensity of pain and the patient rates his/her overall or average daily pain.
collected at baseline, first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
Patient reported outcomes - Spine Oncology Study Group Outcome Questionnaire (SOSGOQ)
This is a new HRQOL outcome tool which was developed specifically for metastatic spine tumor. It is currently available in English and Hungarian. It contains 20 items representing all four domains of the International Classification of Function and Disability. Additionally there are seven follow-up questions referring to treatment satisfaction. It is made up of five domains: physical function, neural function, pain, mental health and social function. It was developed as a comparison to the SF-36 for patients with spine tumors.
collected at baseline, first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Symptoms: American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale
collected at baseline, first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
Symptoms: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) classification
collected at baseline, first prospective treatment, and at follow-up.
Symptoms: Epidural Compression Classification
Collected at baseline
Spine Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS)
collected at baseline and first prospective treatment,
Eligibility Criteria
Patient diagnosed with a metastatic tumor of the spine.
You may qualify if:
- Patient 18 or older.
- Patient diagnosed with a metastatic tumor of the spine
- Informed consent obtained, i.e.:
- Ability to understand the content of the patient information/ICF
- Willingness and ability to participate in the registry according to the Registry Plan
- Signed and dated EC/IRB approved written informed consent (if consent is required by the EC/ IRB at the registry site)
You may not qualify if:
- Patient diagnosed with a primary tumor of the spine.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AO Innovation Translation Centerlead
- AO Foundation, AO Spinecollaborator
Study Sites (24)
University of California The UCSF Spine Center Department of Neurological Surgery
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
Rush University Medical Center University Neurosurgery
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Johns Hopkins University Department of Neurosurgery / Spine Division
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
Harvard Medical School Department of Neurosurgery
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Mayo Clinic Department of Neurosurgery
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10065, United States
University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurosurgery
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
Penn Presbyterian Medical Center Department of Neurosurgery
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown university Department of Neurosurgery
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Department of Neurosurgery
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Monash University Melbourne
Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia
Vancouver General Hospital and the University of British Columbia
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
Winnipeg Spine Program University of Manitoba Department of Surgery
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1R9, Canada
Toronto Western Hospital Department of Neurosurgery Division of Surgery
Toronto, Ontario, 4W449, Canada
University of Toronto Odette Cancer Centre - T2 158 Sunnybrook Health Sciences Ccenter
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada
McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4, Canada
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus der Technischen Universität Dresden
Dresden, Saxony, 01307, Germany
National Center for Spinal Disorders and Buda Health Center
Budapest, 1126, Hungary
Instituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Department of Oncologic and Degenerative Spine Surgery
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, 40136, Italy
IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi Centro die Chirurgia Ortopedica Oncologica e Ricostr
Milan, Lombardy, 20161, Italy
Kanazawa Medical University Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Uchinoda, Ishikawa-ken, 920-0293, Japan
Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
Utrecht, 3508, Netherlands
National University of Singapore Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Singapore, 119288, Singapore
Universitätsspital Basel Wirbelsäulenzentrum
Basel, Basel, 4031, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Charles G. Fisher, MD
Vancouver General Hospital and the University of British Columbia
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 5 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 21, 2016
First Posted
July 12, 2016
Study Start
November 15, 2017
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 15, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 15, 2026
Last Updated
February 25, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share