Implementation and Evaluation of a Pediatric Nurse-driven Sedation Protocol in a PICU
SEDATIDE
1 other identifier
observational
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Management of analgesia and sedation is an integral component of the medical care of a critically-ill child. Its role is to assure comfort and safety to a patient undergoing painful cares and technical procedures; it can also be, in particular situations like acute respiratory distress syndrome or acute brain injury, a full processing treatment. Sedation involves, most of the time, the association of an opioid and a sedative. The use of these drugs is difficult in children, because of a specific metabolism, inducing tolerance and withdrawal in case of prolonged administration. The COMFORT-BEHAVIOR (COMFORT-B) scale is a validated, simple, reliable and reproducible score evaluating sedation and analgesia. Sedation scoring systems must be used regularly to avoid inadequate sedation. Excessive sedation is associated with poor outcomes like prolonged mechanical ventilation, longer hospitalisation and more frequent withdrawal symptoms. Adult and paediatric data suggest that goal-directed sedation algorithms allow a more appropriate adaptation of the treatment to the patient's need and permit a reduction in the duration of mechanical ventilation. The objective was to evaluate the impact of a nurse-driven sedation protocol in a paediatric intensive care unit on duration of mechanical ventilation, total doses and duration of medications, Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) length of stay, incidence of ventilator-associated-pneumonia and occurrence of withdrawal.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2013
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 28, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 12, 2016
CompletedJuly 12, 2016
June 1, 2016
2.2 years
June 28, 2016
July 8, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Duration of mechanical ventilation (days)
Over the PICU stay of each child (Day 5)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Total doses of sedatives (unit/kg)
Over the PICU stay of each child (Day 5)
Occurrence of withdrawal symptoms
Over the PICU stay of each child (Day 5)
Length of PICU stay (days)
Over the PICU stay of each child (Day 5)
Study Arms (2)
group 1 : pre implementation group
All children aged less than 18 years, requiring mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours and admitted in PICU between January 2013 and December 2013. Prior to implementation of the protocol, analgesia and sedation were managed by the attending physician's order.
group 2 : post implementation group
All children aged less than 18 years, requiring mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours and admitted in PICU between May 2014 and March 2015. Nurses managed analgesia and sedation following an algorithm, including COMFORT-B scale.
Interventions
The nurse-driven sedation protocol included the COMFORT-B scale. Initial doses were chosen by the physicians then all changes were made by the nurses with the aim of attaining an optimal range of analgesia and sedation, which was defined as values from 11 to 17 on the COMFORT-B score.
Eligibility Criteria
All children aged from 0 to 18 years, requiring mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours admitted in a PICU between January 2013 and December 2013 and between May 2014 and March 2015.
You may qualify if:
- Mechanically-ventilated patients aged from 0 to 18 years receiving sedation for more than 24 hours
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with tracheostomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
service de réanimation pédiatrique, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant (HFME), Hospices Civils de Lyon, 59 Boulevard Pinel
Bron, 69677, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fabienne Bordet, MD
service de réanimation pédiatrique, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant (HFME), Hospices Civils de Lyon
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 28, 2016
First Posted
July 12, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
July 12, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-06