Testing the Effectiveness of Integrating Relationship Education Into an Existing Workforce Readiness Program
1 other identifier
interventional
909
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The project will test the strategy of integrating 25 hours of relationship education into an existing employment program for low-income individuals ages 18-30. It will use a 2-arm randomized controlled trial to test the effect of this full package of services on participants' employment outcomes and relationship outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 12, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedApril 5, 2021
March 1, 2021
2.3 years
July 8, 2016
March 31, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (14)
Perceived romantic relationship skills
Six-item scale (α = 0.84) equal to the average level of agreement-from "strongly disagree" (= 1) to "strongly agree" (= 4)-with 6 statements.
1 year after random assignment
Perceived conflict management skills
Five-item scale (α = 0.77) equal to the average self-assessment-from "I am bad at this" (= 1) to "I am extremely good at this" (= 4)-of 5 skills.
1 year after random assignment
Support for going slow in romantic relationships
Single-item scale equal to the level of agreement-from "strongly disagree" (= 1) to "strongly agree" (= 4)-with the following statement: "People are more likely to succeed in their relationships if they take things slowly."
1 year after random assignment
Disapproval of couple violence
Five-item scale (α = 0.77) equal to the average level of disagreement-from "strongly agree" (= 1) to "strongly disagree" (= 4)-with 5 statements.
1 year after random assignment
Any exposure to psychological abuse
Binary variable equal to 1 if the respondent indicates that a romantic partner has done any of the following in the past year: * Try to keep you from seeing or talking with your friends * Make you feel stupid * Keep money from you or take your money without asking * Made you feel afraid that they might hurt you
1 year after random assignment
Any exposure to physical abuse
Binary variable equal to 1 if the respondent indicates that a romantic partner has done any of the following in the past year: * Push, shove, or slap you * Punch or kick you or beat you up
1 year after random assignment
Any perpetration of physical abuse
Binary variable equal to 1 if the respondent indicates that they did any of the following to a romantic partner in the past year: * Pushed, shoved, or slapped them * Punched, kicked, or beat them up
1 year after random assignment
Involved in an unsteady relationship
Binary variable equal to 1 if the respondent reports being involved in an on-again/off-again relationship at the time of the follow-up survey and equal to 0 if the respondent reports being married, engaged, romantically involved on a steady basis, or not in a romantic relationship at the time of the follow-up survey.
1 year after random assignment
Had an unintended pregnancy
Binary variable equal to 1 if the respondent reports that they had been/gotten someone pregnant since study enrollment and that they did not want to be/get someone pregnant or the pregnancy came sooner than intended.
1 year after random assignment
Employed or training to improve job prospects
Binary variable equal to 1 if the respondent was employed, participating in a job training program, or enrolled in school at the time of the follow-up survey.
1 year after random assignment
Monthly earnings, administrative records
Continuous variable constructed from NDNH data that is created by summing quarterly earnings across the four quarters following random assignment and dividing by 12.
1 year after random assignment
Monthly earnings, survey report
Continuous variable constructed from survey data that is based on average monthly earnings from all jobs in the first year following study enrollment.
1 year after random assignment
Better off financially now
Binary variable equal to 1 if the respondent feels better off financially now than a year ago.
1 year after random assignment
Economic hardship
Continuous variable that represents how many of the following six economic hardships the respondent experienced since study enrollment
1 year after random assignment
Study Arms (2)
Employment Services only
ACTIVE COMPARATOR'Workforce Readiness Program'. job readiness workshop, organized into ten daily sessions over two weeks. The main content of these sessions will be a program-developed workforce readiness training, developed with funding from a DOL Career Pathways Bridge grant.
Employment Services with HMRE content
EXPERIMENTAL'Workforce Readiness Program supplemented with Relationship Education': job readiness workshop, organized into ten daily sessions over two weeks. Program will add approximately 17 hours of content from the Within My Reach relationship education curriculum to the two-week job readiness workshop - and add up to eight additional one-hour relationship skills education sessions that customers can attend in the five weeks after completing the initial two-week job readiness workshop
Interventions
job readiness workshops, organized into ten daily sessions over two weeks.
25-hours of "Within My Reach" curriculum and relationship skills education sessions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- disconnected from workforce
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
FWCA
St Louis, Missouri, 63133, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Brian Goesling, PhD
Mathematica Policy Research
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2016
First Posted
July 12, 2016
Study Start
August 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
April 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03