The Effect of IoC on Analgesia for Elderly Patients With Postoperative Effectiveness
The Effect of IoC on the Level of Intraoperative Analgesia for Elderly Patients With Postoperative Effectiveness
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The morbidity of colorectal cancer and the surgery number among elderly is growing. The investigators need to provide more advanced and specific monitoring technology for these patients. Index of consciousness (IoC) monitor is now widely used among endoscopy, cholecystectomy and other common clinical applications. The investigators goal is to verify whether using IoC monitor could help to improve the postoperative recovery after colorectal surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
Started Jul 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 11, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2018
CompletedJanuary 20, 2017
January 1, 2017
1.4 years
June 26, 2016
January 18, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Duration time in PACU
patients able to leave PACU with the proper Aldrete score
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Use of remifentanil
during surgery
Use of propofol
during surgery
length of hospital stay (LOS)
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Study Arms (2)
study group
EXPERIMENTALUsing Angel-6000D Multiparameter Anesthesia Monitor to maintain the Hemodynamic stability during surgery. Keep IoC1 40 to 60 while IoC2 30-50.Target concentration of propofol was decreased by 0.5 μg/ml per adjustment when IoC1\<40, with a maintenance value between 40 and 60. The target concentration of remifentanil was increased by 1 ng/ml per adjustment when IoC2\>50 but was decreased by 1 ng/ml per adjustment when IoC2\<30, with the maintenance value between 30 and 50.
control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORUsing BIS VISTA Monitor to maintain the Hemodynamic stability during surgery. Keep BIS 40 to 60.The doses of propofol and remifentanil were adjusted by the anesthetists according to BIS. Target concentration of propofol was decreased by 0.5 μg/ml per adjustment when BIS\<40, with a maintenance value between 40 and 60. The target concentration of remifentanil was increased by 1 ng/ml per adjustment when BIS\>60 but was decreased by 1 ng/ml per adjustment when BIS\<40, with the maintenance value between 40 and 60.
Interventions
The Angel-6000D Multiparameter Anesthesia Monitor, Shenzhen Weihaokang Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Guangdong, China
BIS VISTA Monitor, Covidien, Changchun city shi jia trade co., Ltd, Changchun, China
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged over 60 years old that underwent Colorectal surgery in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University.
You may not qualify if:
- Having severe comorbidity history,for example,severe cardiac dysfunction
- Having central nervous system disease, severe endocrine, and history of mental disorders
- Alcoholic and long-term use of sedatives and opioids history
- Drug allergy history.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
FirstXianJiaotongU
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Qiang Wang, PHD
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2016
First Posted
July 11, 2016
Study Start
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
May 1, 2018
Last Updated
January 20, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share