Modified Luteal Support for Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer - A Prospective Study
1 other identifier
interventional
62
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) success rate with modified luteal support - addition of a single injection of HCG and GnRH-agonist, on day of ET and 4 days later, respectively vs. traditional luteal support with vaginal progesterone only in ovulating women.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jul 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 3, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 7, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2017
CompletedDecember 13, 2016
December 1, 2016
11 months
July 3, 2016
December 11, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ongoing pregnancy
Number of viable pregnancies at about 10-12 weeks of gestation.
About 10-12 weeks after embryo transfer
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Implantation rate
2 weeks after embryo transfer
Clinical pregnancy
About 3-4 weeks after embryo transfer
Study Arms (2)
Study group
EXPERIMENTALhCG (Choriogonadotropin alfa; Ovitrelle 250 mcg) on day of embryo transfer \& GnRH-agonist (Triptorelin acetate; Decapeptyl 0.1 mg) after 4 days In addition to the usual progesterone luteal support.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONThe usual progesterone only luteal phase support.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old women
- Spontaneously ovulating women
- Treated in our IVF unit for frozen-thawed embryo transfer
- At least one top quality embryo
You may not qualify if:
- PGD patients
- More than 4 previous embryo transfers
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sheba medical center
Ramat Gan, Israel
Related Publications (13)
Thurin A, Hausken J, Hillensjo T, Jablonowska B, Pinborg A, Strandell A, Bergh C. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 2;351(23):2392-402. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041032.
PMID: 15575055BACKGROUNDLe Lannou D, Griveau JF, Laurent MC, Gueho A, Veron E, Morcel K. Contribution of embryo cryopreservation to elective single embryo transfer in IVF-ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 Sep;13(3):368-75. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61441-1.
PMID: 16984767BACKGROUNDShapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C. Clinical rationale for cryopreservation of entire embryo cohorts in lieu of fresh transfer. Fertil Steril. 2014 Jul;102(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.04.018. Epub 2014 May 17.
PMID: 24842675BACKGROUNDShapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril. 2011 Aug;96(2):344-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.050. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
PMID: 21737072BACKGROUNDOrvieto R, Fisch B, Feldberg D. Endometrial Preparation for Patients undergoing Frozen- Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles. In: The Art & Science of Assisted Reproductive Techniques. G. Allahbadia, R. asuray, R. Merchant, Eds. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. New Delhi, India, 2003, pp. 396-9.
BACKGROUNDNavot D, Laufer N, Kopolovic J, Rabinowitz R, Birkenfeld A, Lewin A, Granat M, Margalioth EJ, Schenker JG. Artificially induced endometrial cycles and establishment of pregnancies in the absence of ovaries. N Engl J Med. 1986 Mar 27;314(13):806-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198603273141302.
PMID: 3951513BACKGROUNDPritts EA, Atwood AK. Luteal phase support in infertility treatment: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials. Hum Reprod. 2002 Sep;17(9):2287-99. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.9.2287.
PMID: 12202415BACKGROUNDMeldrum DR. Female reproductive aging--ovarian and uterine factors. Fertil Steril. 1993 Jan;59(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55608-8.
PMID: 8419194BACKGROUNDFatemi HM, Kyrou D, Bourgain C, Van den Abbeel E, Griesinger G, Devroey P. Cryopreserved-thawed human embryo transfer: spontaneous natural cycle is superior to human chorionic gonadotropin-induced natural cycle. Fertil Steril. 2010 Nov;94(6):2054-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.11.036. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
PMID: 20097333BACKGROUNDTesarik J, Hazout A, Mendoza C. Enhancement of embryo developmental potential by a single administration of GnRH agonist at the time of implantation. Hum Reprod. 2004 May;19(5):1176-80. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh235. Epub 2004 Apr 7.
PMID: 15070873BACKGROUNDTesarik J, Hazout A, Mendoza-Tesarik R, Mendoza N, Mendoza C. Beneficial effect of luteal-phase GnRH agonist administration on embryo implantation after ICSI in both GnRH agonist- and antagonist-treated ovarian stimulation cycles. Hum Reprod. 2006 Oct;21(10):2572-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del173. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
PMID: 16926261BACKGROUNDOrvieto R, Brengauz M, Feldman B. A novel approach to normal responder patient with repeated implantation failures--a case report. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015 Jun;31(6):435-7. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2015.1005595. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
PMID: 25731193BACKGROUNDHaas J, Lantsberg D, Feldman N, Manela D, Machtinger R, Dar S, Rabinovici J, Orvieto R. Modifying the luteal phase support in natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer improves cycle outcome. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015;31(11):891-3. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2015.1075502. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
PMID: 26288149BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 3, 2016
First Posted
July 7, 2016
Study Start
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
June 1, 2017
Last Updated
December 13, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share