NCT02823431

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how urethral analgesia impacts voiding efficiency in healthy women. The investigator hypothesizes that anesthetizing the urethral with lidocaine gel will decrease voiding efficiency as measured by standard bladder testing (urodynamic testing).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
23

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 28, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2016

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 6, 2016

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2016

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 27, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

July 27, 2018

Status Verified

October 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

April 28, 2016

Results QC Date

June 5, 2017

Last Update Submit

October 23, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

voiding efficiencydetrusor underactivityurodynamics

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Voiding Efficiency

    voided volume/{voided volume + residual volume} during micturition study during urodynamic studies

    duration of urodynamic study, 2 hours

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Detrusor Pressure at Maximum Flow

    duration of urodynamic study, 2 hours

  • Number of Participants With Interrupted Urinary Flow Pattern During Micturition

    duration of urodynamic study, 2 hours

  • Visual Analog Scale Scores (Measure of Discomfort) After Catheterization

    duration of urodynamic study, 2 hours

Study Arms (2)

Analgesia Arm

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants randomized to this arm will undergo uroflow studies then be given a 2-hour rest. Urodynamics with the use of Urojet (lidocaine hydrochloride 2%) will then be performed. The lidocaine gel will be placed in and around the urethra. It will be allowed to set for 3 minutes, then the remainder of the standard urodynamic evaluation will be performed. We are using Urojet (lidocaine gel) in an FDA approved manner (for analgesia).

Drug: lidocaine gel

Placebo Arm

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants randomized to this arm will first undergo uroflow studies then be given a 2-hour rest. Urodynamic testing without analgesia (standard of care) will then be performed.

Other: Plain aqueous gel

Interventions

Also known as: Urojet 2% gel
Analgesia Arm
Also known as: KY gel
Placebo Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Females ages 18-60 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Able to provide informed consent and agree to the risks of the study
  • Willing to abstain from caffeine and alcohol for 24 hours
  • Willing to avoid taking anticholinergic medications (for reasons other than incontinence; e.g., diphenhydramine) for one week prior to the procedure
  • Pelvic organ prolapse past the hymen
  • Multiple sclerosis, myasthenia gravis, Parkinson's Disease, stroke within the past 6 months
  • Interstitial cystitis / Bladder Pain Syndrome
  • Recurrent (≥ 3/year) urinary tract infections
  • Positive pregnancy test at the time of consent
  • ≤ 6 weeks postpartum or if breastfeeding
  • Positive urine dip (\>+1nitrites or \>1+LE) and urinary symptoms at the time of consent
  • \>1+ blood on urinary dip
  • Morbid obesity (BMI \>40)
  • Taking anticholinergic medications for urinary incontinence
  • \>2 replies of ≥ "sometimes" on the Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire at the time of consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Duke University Campus

Durham, North Carolina, 27708, United States

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Chen SC, Grill WM, Fan WJ, Kou YR, Lin YS, Lai CH, Peng CW. Bilateral pudendal afferent stimulation improves bladder emptying in rats with urinary retention. BJU Int. 2012 Apr;109(7):1051-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10526.x. Epub 2011 Aug 23.

    PMID: 21883860BACKGROUND
  • Peng CW, Chen JJ, Cheng CL, Grill WM. Improved bladder emptying in urinary retention by electrical stimulation of pudendal afferents. J Neural Eng. 2008 Jun;5(2):144-54. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/5/2/005. Epub 2008 Apr 22.

    PMID: 18430976BACKGROUND
  • Shafik A, Shafik AA, El-Sibai O, Ahmed I. Role of positive urethrovesical feedback in vesical evacuation. The concept of a second micturition reflex: the urethrovesical reflex. World J Urol. 2003 Aug;21(3):167-70. doi: 10.1007/s00345-003-0340-5. Epub 2003 Jul 25.

    PMID: 12898170BACKGROUND
  • Kisby CK, Gonzalez EJ, Visco AG, Amundsen CL, Grill WM. Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Impact of Intraurethral Lidocaine on Urodynamic Voiding Parameters. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jul/Aug;25(4):265-270. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000544.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Bladder, Underactive

Interventions

Gels

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesLower Urinary Tract SymptomsUrological ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ColloidsComplex MixturesDosage FormsPharmaceutical Preparations

Results Point of Contact

Title
Warren Grill PhD
Organization
Duke Biomedical Engineering

Study Officials

  • Warren Grill

    Duke University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2016

First Posted

July 6, 2016

Study Start

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion

December 1, 2016

Study Completion

December 1, 2016

Last Updated

July 27, 2018

Results First Posted

July 27, 2018

Record last verified: 2017-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations