NCT02822846

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic qualities of lung ultrasonography to monitor the position of the intubation probe. The primary assessment criterion is of study the position of the intubation probe with two examinations carried out independently :

  • sonography
  • chest radiography A correct position of the intubation probe will be considered if there is :
  • Highlighting of the extremity of the intubation probe in endo tracheal
  • Highlighting bilateral lung sliding

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
79

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 30, 2016

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 4, 2016

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 19, 2016

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

September 12, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

June 30, 2016

Last Update Submit

September 8, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Lung ultrasoundSliding lungProbe position

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Evaluation of the position of intubation probe by comparison between chest radiography and lung ultrasonography

    correct position is defined by : * visualization of the probe intubation extremity in endotracheal * visualization of bilateral lung sliding

    day of enrollment

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Number of patients with malposition of the oesophageal or selective intubation probe

    day of enrollment

  • Number of mobilized intubation probes

    day of enrollment

  • Number of malpositions of the intubation probe evaluated with lung ultrasonography by junior evaluator

    day of enrollment

  • Number of malpositions of the intubation probe evaluated with lung ultrasonography by senior evaluator

    day of enrollment

  • Number of malpositions of the intubation probe evaluated with a chest radiography by junior evaluator

    day of enrollment

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Day - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Intubated and ventilated minors

You may qualify if:

  • Patient less than 18 years old
  • Patient intubated and ventilated
  • intubation probe considered in place on auscultation
  • SpO2\> 92%
  • Affiliate or entitled to a social security scheme
  • No opposition of any of the parents.

You may not qualify if:

  • Children too unstable : decompensated shock
  • Spontaneous pneumothorax
  • Heart massage ongoing
  • Chest trauma
  • Faulty position of the probe intubation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Intensive Care Unit of Necker Hospital

Paris, Paris, 75015, France

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Knapp S, Kofler J, Stoiser B, Thalhammer F, Burgmann H, Posch M, Hofbauer R, Stanzel M, Frass M. The assessment of four different methods to verify tracheal tube placement in the critical care setting. Anesth Analg. 1999 Apr;88(4):766-70. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199904000-00016.

    PMID: 10195521BACKGROUND
  • Harris EA, Arheart KL, Penning DH. Endotracheal tube malposition within the pediatric population: a common event despite clinical evidence of correct placement. Can J Anaesth. 2008 Oct;55(10):685-90. doi: 10.1007/BF03017744.

    PMID: 18835966BACKGROUND
  • Schmolzer GM, O'Reilly M, Davis PG, Cheung PY, Roehr CC. Confirmation of correct tracheal tube placement in newborn infants. Resuscitation. 2013 Jun;84(6):731-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.11.028. Epub 2012 Dec 1.

    PMID: 23211476BACKGROUND
  • Chou EH, Dickman E, Tsou PY, Tessaro M, Tsai YM, Ma MH, Lee CC, Marshall J. Ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2015 May;90:97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 Feb 21.

    PMID: 25711517BACKGROUND
  • Pfeiffer P, Rudolph SS, Borglum J, Isbye DL. Temporal comparison of ultrasound vs. auscultation and capnography in verification of endotracheal tube placement. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011 Nov;55(10):1190-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02501.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

    PMID: 22092123BACKGROUND
  • American College of Emergency Physicians. Clinical Policies Committee. Verification of endotracheal tube placement. Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Nov;40(5):551-2. No abstract available.

    PMID: 12425285BACKGROUND
  • Guerder M, Maurin O, Merckx A, Foissac F, Oualha M, Renolleau S, Vedrenne-Cloquet M. Diagnostic value of pleural ultrasound to refine endotracheal tube placement in pediatric intensive care unit. Arch Pediatr. 2021 Nov;28(8):712-717. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2021.09.006. Epub 2021 Oct 6.

    PMID: 34625381BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Julie Starck, MD

    AP-HP, Necker hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2016

First Posted

July 4, 2016

Study Start

November 19, 2016

Primary Completion

November 1, 2018

Study Completion

November 1, 2018

Last Updated

September 12, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations