NCT02819570

Brief Summary

The objective of the study is to compare a new antibiotic protocol with the current prophylactic treatment in routine use and to evaluate obstetric and neonatal outcome: preterm labor, chorioamnionitis and early onset sepsis

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
400

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2015

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2015

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 2, 2016

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 30, 2016

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

December 29, 2016

Status Verified

December 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

June 2, 2016

Last Update Submit

December 28, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

early-onset neonatal sepsisProphylactic antibioticsPregnancyPPROMEOS

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • EARLY NEONATAL SEPSIS - positive blood culture

    Number of Participants with early neonatal sepsis

    within 3 days of delivery

  • latency period

    time in days

    from date of randomization until the date of delivery assessed up to 10 weeks

  • Chorioamnionitis rate

    rate of positive cultures

    from day of randomization until date of clinical/laboratory chorioamnionitis diagnosis assessed up to 10 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Neonatal weight

    at delivery

  • Apgar score

    1 minute 5 minute

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Number of participants with adverse events as assessed by umbilical cord acid-based analysis<7

    at delivery

  • Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission duration

    days since delivery until rerelease from NICU, assessed up to 6 month

Study Arms (2)

cefuroxime

EXPERIMENTAL

I.V cefuroxime 750 mg\*3/d for 2days followed by P.O cefuroxime 500 mgx2/d in addition to P.O roxithromycin 150 mg\*2/d for 7 days

Drug: I.V cefuroxime 750 mg*3/d for 2 daysDrug: P.O cefuroxime 500 mgx2/d for 5 daysDrug: P.O roxithromycin 150 mg*2/d for 7 days

ampicillin

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

I.V ampicillin 2 gram x4/d for 2 days followed by P.O moxypen 500 mgx3/d for 5 days in addition to P.O roxithromycin 150 mg\*2/d for 7 days

Drug: I.V ampicillin 2 gram x4/d for 2 daysDrug: P.O roxithromycin 150 mg*2/d for 7 daysDrug: P.O moxypen 500 mgx3/d for 5 days

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Women with PPROM between 24+0 and 34+0 weeks of gestation who are suitable for conservative management

You may not qualify if:

  • P-PROM\>34 weeks of gestation
  • Suspected fetal distress or chorioamnionitis
  • Active labor
  • Drug allergy to one of the study regiments
  • Immune deficiency
  • Multiple pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Galil Medical Center

Nahariya, Israel, Israel

RECRUITING

Related Publications (15)

  • Mercer BM. Preterm premature rupture of the membranes: current approaches to evaluation and management. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2005 Sep;32(3):411-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2005.03.003.

    PMID: 16125041BACKGROUND
  • Newton ER. Chorioamnionitis and intraamniotic infection. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Dec;36(4):795-808. doi: 10.1097/00003081-199312000-00004.

    PMID: 8293582BACKGROUND
  • Sperling RS, Newton E, Gibbs RS. Intraamniotic infection in low-birth-weight infants. J Infect Dis. 1988 Jan;157(1):113-7. doi: 10.1093/infdis/157.1.113.

    PMID: 3335795BACKGROUND
  • Practice bulletins No. 139: premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;122(4):918-930. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000435415.21944.8f.

    PMID: 24084566BACKGROUND
  • Carlan SJ, O'Brien WF, Parsons MT, Lense JJ. Preterm premature rupture of membranes: a randomized study of home versus hospital management. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jan;81(1):61-4.

    PMID: 8416463BACKGROUND
  • Turnbull DA, Wilkinson C, Gerard K, Shanahan M, Ryan P, Griffith EC, Kruzins G, Stamp GE. Clinical, psychosocial, and economic effects of antenatal day care for three medical complications of pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial of 395 women. Lancet. 2004 Apr 3;363(9415):1104-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15893-5.

    PMID: 15064028BACKGROUND
  • Roberts D, Dalziel S. Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD004454. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004454.pub2.

    PMID: 16856047BACKGROUND
  • Harding JE, Pang J, Knight DB, Liggins GC. Do antenatal corticosteroids help in the setting of preterm rupture of membranes? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jan;184(2):131-9. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.108331.

    PMID: 11174492BACKGROUND
  • Kenyon S, Boulvain M, Neilson JP. Antibiotics for preterm rupture of membranes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 2;2013(12):CD001058. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001058.pub3.

    PMID: 24297389BACKGROUND
  • Mercer BM, Miodovnik M, Thurnau GR, Goldenberg RL, Das AF, Ramsey RD, Rabello YA, Meis PJ, Moawad AH, Iams JD, Van Dorsten JP, Paul RH, Bottoms SF, Merenstein G, Thom EA, Roberts JM, McNellis D. Antibiotic therapy for reduction of infant morbidity after preterm premature rupture of the membranes. A randomized controlled trial. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. JAMA. 1997 Sep 24;278(12):989-95.

    PMID: 9307346BACKGROUND
  • Workowski KA, Berman S; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010 Dec 17;59(RR-12):1-110.

    PMID: 21160459BACKGROUND
  • Grigsby PL, Novy MJ, Sadowsky DW, Morgan TK, Long M, Acosta E, Duffy LB, Waites KB. Maternal azithromycin therapy for Ureaplasma intraamniotic infection delays preterm delivery and reduces fetal lung injury in a primate model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Dec;207(6):475.e1-475.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.871. Epub 2012 Oct 23.

    PMID: 23111115BACKGROUND
  • Wolf MF, Miron D, Peleg D, Rechnitzer H, Portnov I, Salim R, Keness Y, Reich D, Ami MB, Peretz A, Koshnir A, Shachar IB. Reconsidering the Current Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes Antibiotic Prophylactic Protocol. Am J Perinatol. 2015 Nov;32(13):1247-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1552935. Epub 2015 May 29.

    PMID: 26023907BACKGROUND
  • Sgayer I, Francis YN, Miron D, Shprits E, Sheffer VF, Rechnitzer H, Lowenstein L, Wolf MF. Compared perinatal outcomes of two prophylactic antibiotic regimens for preterm premature rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 May;5(5):100900. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100900. Epub 2023 Feb 13.

  • Wolf MF, Sgayer I, Miron D, Krencel A, Sheffer VF, Idriss SS, Sammour RN, Peleg D, Shachar IB, Rechnitzer H, Bornstein J. A novel extended prophylactic antibiotic regimen in preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes: A randomized trial. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;96:254-259. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.005. Epub 2020 May 11.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fetal Membranes, Premature RuptureNeonatal SepsisPreterm Premature Rupture of the Membranes

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Obstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancy ComplicationsFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesSepsisInfectionsInfant, Newborn, DiseasesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Maya Wolf, MD

    1Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Galilee Medical Center, 2Faculty of Medicine in the Galilee, Bar Ilan University, Nahariya, Israel

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2016

First Posted

June 30, 2016

Study Start

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion

December 1, 2017

Study Completion

December 1, 2017

Last Updated

December 29, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations