Monocentric Study and Prognostic of Treatments Endodontics of Teeth With Periapical Pathology Realized CSERD (Nantes University Hospital)
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Endodontic therapy is to achieve the eviction of the inflamed or infected pulp and fill the canal opening with a hermetic sealing material. The analysis of the literature on intracanal therapeutic shows great variability of the results obtained, the reported success rate is 53 to 95%. This is explained by the difficulty of the surgical procedure, but also by the multiplicity of possible factors of failure, related practitioner, canal anatomy, the operating procedures, the preparation techniques and root canal filling. This success rate is variable depending on the presence or absence of periapical pathology before treatment: more than 85% for teeth treated without initial periapical pathology against only 62% for teeth with pathology before treatment. Furthermore, the literature review revealed two contradictory assumptions about the dominant factor failure in endodontics: the failure of the sealing canal system (bad level shutter) against the failure of the endovascular disinfection. Main hypothesis of the research objectives: The probability of success in a year endodontic treatments carried out according to the recommendations and the operating standards on teeth with periapical pathology is approximately 60%. The primary prognostic factors would be the existence of intracanal obstacles (stop calcification ...) responsible for a sub-obturation of the canal, factors inherent to the tooth (situation ductal anatomy and complexity), the operating techniques used, the practitioner ( skill level), the quality of the restoration.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 31, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 30, 2016
CompletedJune 30, 2016
May 1, 2016
7.1 years
May 31, 2016
June 27, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The assessment at one year of intracanal treatment on teeth defined on clinical and radiographic criteria, as recommended by the ESE (European Society of Endodontology) (success / failure / uncertain cases)
Consider the probability of failure of intracanal treatment on teeth with periapical pathology in the first year following treatment.
1 year
Study Arms (1)
Endodontic treatment for a tooth with a periapical pathology
OTHERInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged at least 18 years
- Patient receiving endodontic treatment for a tooth with a periapical pathology (Category IV of Baume)
- Patients affiliated to a social security scheme or of such a regime,
- Patients admitted to the CSERD,
- Patients in good general health,
- Patient compliant (see medical records: number of appointments not honored)
- Patients with a fixed address and available by telephone, pledging to return a year after treatment at a follow-up consultation for clinical and radiographic examination, and prevent CSERD of any changes of address and telephone number.
- Patients including French
- Patients free of guardianship or trusteeship
You may not qualify if:
- Age between 0 and 18
- Tooth with a pulp pathology type Category III of Baume
- Unspecified sheet in diagnosis
- Patients with general contraindication against the endodontic treatment of teeth with periapical pathology (risk oslérien, immuno-depressed subjects, patients with prosthetic hip, knee).
- No possibility of rubber dam during endodontic treatment.
- Patient with latex allergy (contraindicating the installation of a dam and possibly endodontic obturation with gutta-percha)
- Patients whose postoperative follow is deemed random by the investigator (cf. medical record: number of appointments not honored)
- Patient not engaging to return for clinical and radiographic examination in a year
- Patients with temporary housing or no fixed address: Living in a furnished accommodation or a hotel room, in a nursing home, in a home-type squat, Homeless
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Nantes University Hospital
Nantes, 44000, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Benedicte ENKEL, Doctor
Nantes University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 31, 2016
First Posted
June 30, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2009
Primary Completion
April 1, 2016
Study Completion
April 1, 2016
Last Updated
June 30, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-05