Recovery Profiles After c Spine Surgery: With or Without Dexmedetomidine as an Anesthetic Adjuvant
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the recovery profiles after general anesthesia in patient undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery. This study will compare the Riker sedation agitation scores between two groups, with or without dexmedetomidine as an anesthetic adjuvant.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 15, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 30, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2018
CompletedJune 30, 2016
June 1, 2016
1.9 years
June 15, 2016
June 27, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Riker sedation agitation scores
After finish the operation, Desflurane will be stopped. All patients will be received the neuromuscular reversal drugs and TOF ratio \> 0.9. All patients will be evaluated by Riker sedation agitation score before extubation and re-evaluated again at 15 minutes after extubation. Riker sedation agitation scores 1. Dangerous agitation: trying to get out of bed, pulling out tube, thrashing 2. Very agitated: may require physical restraint, unable to calm with verbal instructions. 3. Agitated: mild agitation and anxiety but calm down with verbal instructions. 4. Calm and cooperative: aroused easily and follows commands 5. Sedated: difficult to aroused, but does arouse to verbal or physical stimuli, able to follow simple commands 6. Very sedated: does not follow commands but arouses to physical stimulation 7. Unarousable: little or no response to noxious stimuli
before extubation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Fentanyl consumption
during surgery
Study Arms (2)
Dexmedetomidine
ACTIVE COMPARATORDemedetomidine infusion (2mcg/ml); loading 0.5 mcg/kg for 30 min (BW/2 ml/h for 30 min), then 0.5 mcg/kg (BW/4 ml/h) until 30 minutes before finish the operation.
NSS
PLACEBO COMPARATORNSS loading BW/2 ml/h for 30 min, then BW/4 ml/h until 30 minutes before finish the operation.
Interventions
Demedetomidine infusion (2mcg/ml); loading 0.5 mcg/kg for 30 min (BW/2 ml/h for 30 min), then 0.5 mcg/kg (BW/4 ml/h) until 30 minutes before finish the operation.
NSS infusion; loading BW/2 ml/h for 30 min, then BW/4 ml/h until 30 minutes before finish the operation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA 1-3
- elective case for ACDF surgery
- plan for extubation after surgery
You may not qualify if:
- SBP\>140 mmHg
- CAD
- HR\<50 BPM, heart block
- motor weakness \> grade 4
- BMI \>30
- allergic to dexmedetomidine, fentanyl
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
Related Publications (16)
Lepouse C, Lautner CA, Liu L, Gomis P, Leon A. Emergence delirium in adults in the post-anaesthesia care unit. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Jun;96(6):747-53. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael094. Epub 2006 May 2.
PMID: 16670111BACKGROUNDYu D, Chai W, Sun X, Yao L. Emergence agitation in adults: risk factors in 2,000 patients. Can J Anaesth. 2010 Sep;57(9):843-8. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9338-9. Epub 2010 Jun 5.
PMID: 20526708BACKGROUNDKhan ZP, Ferguson CN, Jones RM. alpha-2 and imidazoline receptor agonists. Their pharmacology and therapeutic role. Anaesthesia. 1999 Feb;54(2):146-65. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00659.x.
PMID: 10215710BACKGROUNDMaze M, Scarfini C, Cavaliere F. New agents for sedation in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Clin. 2001 Oct;17(4):881-97. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0704(05)70185-8.
PMID: 11762266BACKGROUNDKim HS, Byon HJ, Kim JE, Park YH, Lee JH, Kim JT. Appropriate dose of dexmedetomidine for the prevention of emergence agitation after desflurane anesthesia for tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy in children: up and down sequential allocation. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 May 27;15:79. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0059-z.
PMID: 26012345BACKGROUNDPolat R, Peker K, Baran I, Bumin Aydin G, Topcu Guloksuz C, Donmez A. Comparison between dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusion in emergence agitation during recovery after nasal surgery: A randomized double-blind trial. Anaesthesist. 2015 Oct;64(10):740-6. doi: 10.1007/s00101-015-0077-8. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
PMID: 26329913BACKGROUNDGopalakrishna KN, Dash PK, Chatterjee N, Easwer HV, Ganesamoorthi A. Dexmedetomidine as an Anesthetic Adjuvant in Patients Undergoing Transsphenoidal Resection of Pituitary Tumor. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2015 Jul;27(3):209-15. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000144.
PMID: 25493927BACKGROUNDAnjum N, Tabish H, Debdas S, Bani HP, Rajat C, Anjana Basu GD. Effects of dexmedetomidine and clonidine as propofol adjuvants on intra-operative hemodynamics and recovery profiles in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized comparative study. Avicenna J Med. 2015 Jul-Sep;5(3):67-73. doi: 10.4103/2231-0770.160231.
PMID: 26229757BACKGROUNDMariappan R, Ashokkumar H, Kuppuswamy B. Comparing the effects of oral clonidine premedication with intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion on anesthetic requirement and recovery from anesthesia in patients undergoing major spine surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2014 Jul;26(3):192-7. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3182a2166f.
PMID: 23887684BACKGROUNDGe DJ, Qi B, Tang G, Li JY. Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine Promotes Postoperative Analgesia in Patients After Abdominal Colectomy: A Consort-Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(37):e1514. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001514.
PMID: 26376397BACKGROUNDAnastasian ZH, Gaudet JG, Levitt LC, Mergeche JL, Heyer EJ, Berman MF. Factors that correlate with the decision to delay extubation after multilevel prone spine surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2014 Apr;26(2):167-71. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000028.
PMID: 24296539BACKGROUNDCavallone LF, Vannucci A. Review article: Extubation of the difficult airway and extubation failure. Anesth Analg. 2013 Feb;116(2):368-83. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31827ab572. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
PMID: 23302983BACKGROUNDKarwacki Z, Niewiadomski S, Rzaska M, Witkowska M. The effect of bispectral index monitoring on anaesthetic requirements in target-controlled infusion for lumbar microdiscectomy. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2014 Sep-Oct;46(4):284-8. doi: 10.5603/AIT.2014.0046.
PMID: 25293480BACKGROUNDTsai CJ, Chu KS, Chen TI, Lu DV, Wang HM, Lu IC. A comparison of the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine versus propofol target-controlled infusion for sedation during fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 2010 Mar;65(3):254-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06226.x. Epub 2010 Jan 22.
PMID: 20105150BACKGROUNDTerao Y, Ichinomiya T, Higashijima U, Tanise T, Miura K, Fukusaki M, Sumikawa K. Comparison between propofol and dexmedetomidine in postoperative sedation after extensive cervical spine surgery. J Anesth. 2012 Apr;26(2):179-86. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1300-7. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
PMID: 22173570BACKGROUNDGe DJ, Qi B, Tang G, Li JY. Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine Promotes Postoperative Analgesia and Recovery in Patients after Abdominal Colectomy: A CONSORT-Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(43):e1727. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001727.
PMID: 26512563BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Busara Sirivanasandha, MD
Department of Anesthesiology, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 15, 2016
First Posted
June 30, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion
April 1, 2018
Study Completion
April 1, 2018
Last Updated
June 30, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share