NCT02812303

Brief Summary

A pilot program was created by the network's primary care leadership team at Massachusetts General Hospital. A population health management program was implemented for chronic disease management. The investigators evaluated quality of care process and outcome measures over the first six months of the program and compared practices assigned a central population health coordinator to those not assigned this support.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
108,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2014

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2014

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2014

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 20, 2016

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 24, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

June 24, 2016

Status Verified

June 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

June 20, 2016

Last Update Submit

June 21, 2016

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Difference in differences in Low density lipoprotein (LDL) goal achievement over the follow-up period comparing PHC to non-PHC practices

    Among patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease

    6 months

  • Difference in differences in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) goal achievement over the follow-up period comparing PHC and non-PHC practices

    Among patients with diabetes

    6 months

  • Difference in differences in Blood pressure (BP) goal achievement over the follow-up period comparing PHC and non-PHC practices

    Among patients with diabetes and hypertension

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Difference in differences in proportion of patients completing breast cancer screening over the follow-up period comparing PHC and non-PHC practices

    6 months

  • Difference in differences in proportion of patients completing cervical cancer screening over the follow-up period comparing PHC and non-PHC practices

    6 months

  • Difference in differences in proportion of patients completing colorectal cancer screening over the follow-up period comparing PHC and non-PHC practices

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

Population Health Coordinator Support

8 practices received the support of central population health coordinators (PHCs). PHCs utilized a population health management (PHM) information technology (IT) tool and performed administrative tasks including appointment scheduling, ordering overdue laboratory testing, chart reviews, and obtaining outside tests/labs. In addition, PHCs regularly met with physicians to review those patients who required clinical intervention to develop an action plan. The network did not have sufficient resources to implement a PHC in all of the 18 network practices. So PHCs were allocated by responses from the practice leader, baseline quality scores, size of the practice, nature of the practice (health center vs not), and location of the practice. These decisions were made in a way that sought to equitably distribute available PHC resources within the practice network as a way to get network buy-in and maximize the impact of the program, both for practices with and without PHCs.

Other: Centralized support for population health management activities

No Population Health Coordinator Support

Ten practices without PHC support were provided training on how to use the PHM IT tool. The staff in these practices remained primarily responsible for managing administrative tasks.

Interventions

Population Health Coordinator Support

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Adult adult (age ≥ 18 years) patients who had at least one visit to a study practice within the prior 3 years at baseline or had a visit during the 6-month study evaluation period and were connected with a specific network physician or practice.

You may qualify if:

  • Diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2), or cardiovascular disease (including coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, and cerebrovascular disease), or hypertension
  • Breast cancer: women 50-74 years of age
  • Cervical cancer: women 21-64 years of age
  • Colorectal cancer: men or women 52-75 years of age

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients not connected with a specific network physician or practice
  • Patients who switched between PHC and non-PHC practices during the follow-up period
  • Breast: bilateral mastectomy
  • Cervical: total hysterectomy Colorectal: total colectomy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • James A, Berkowitz SA, Ashburner JM, Chang Y, Horn DM, O'Keefe SM, Atlas SJ. Impact of a Population Health Management Intervention on Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease Control. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Apr;33(4):463-470. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4227-3. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes MellitusCardiovascular DiseasesHypertension

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Glucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Steven J Atlas, MD, MPH

    Massachusetts General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2016

First Posted

June 24, 2016

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion

December 1, 2014

Study Completion

December 1, 2014

Last Updated

June 24, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations