NCT02810392

Brief Summary

Almost two-thirds of survivors have cognitive impairment (CI), manifested as memory, language, and judgement problems. Post-stroke CI at 2 weeks is a significant predictor of long-term functional outcome, and more generally, cognitive impairments have a major impact on functional outcome and ability to participate in rehabilitation. CI is associated with increased systemic inflammation. Intranasally-administered insulin is a promising new therapy for enhancing memory in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD), shown in multiple randomized controlled studies. Likely mechanisms of benefit are intranasal insulin's ability to restore normal cerebral insulin signaling. Based on the overlap in cerebral insulin resistance that occurs in both AD and post-stroke CI, we have designed an innovative proof-of-concept, feasibility trial designed to provide pilot data as to whether post-stroke survivor CI and caregiver burden is improved with intranasal insulin early after stroke. We will explore the impact of intranasal insulin on inflammatory biomarkers, since inflammation is a major underlying cause of CI, as shown by others and in our preliminary studies of VCAM-1. Specific Aims are: 1. Determine if patients with ischemic stroke randomized to intranasal insulin 20 IU BID for 3 weeks have improved cognition, compared to patients who receive intranasal saline. Primary outcome is a composite of (a) memory and executive function z scores. 2. To assess the impact of intranasal insulin vs saline on change in inflammatory biomarker levels (VCAM-1, TNF-alpha, TNFR-I and II) before and after the treatment period. 3. To measure differences in burden among caregivers of participants in the intranasal insulin vs intranasal saline groups. We will prospectively randomize 40 subjects to intranasal insulin (40 IU) vs saline treatment. Following baseline cognitive testing 2 weeks post stroke, subjects will receive the assigned treatment for 3 weeks, followed by a 3-week washout period, with cognitive testing performed after the treatment and washout periods and again at 20 weeks. The proposed study will provide data on a promising method for treating cognitive function in stroke patients. If effective, our pilot data will set the stage for larger phase III clinical trials.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2 stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2016

Typical duration for phase_2 stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 12, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2016

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 23, 2016

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 4, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 4, 2020

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 13, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

May 13, 2021

Status Verified

January 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3.9 years

First QC Date

February 12, 2016

Results QC Date

March 16, 2021

Last Update Submit

April 20, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (9)

  • Composite of Memory t Scores

    Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) verbal learning and memory and available to facilitate repeat administration in future testing (10 minutes with delay and recognition). The delayed recall is used as the outcome in this study. Brief Visual Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) is a measure of nonverbal learning and memory captured with immediate and delayed free recall trials, and a recognition memory task (10 minutes with delay and recognition). The retained score normalized by age, is used as the outcome for this study. The t scores for both HVLT-R delayed recall and BVMT-R retained are normalized from the raw scores based on age. The t score ranges from 0-100 with 0 denoting a worse outcome. The Composite is the average of the mean t scores for each component.

    baseline

  • Composite of Memory t Scores

    Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) verbal learning and memory and available to facilitate repeat administration in future testing (10 minutes with delay and recognition). The delayed recall is used as the outcome in this study. Brief Visual Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) is a measure of nonverbal learning and memory captured with immediate and delayed free recall trials, and a recognition memory task (10 minutes with delay and recognition). The retained score is used as the outcome for this study. The t scores for both HVLT-R delayed recall and BVMT-R retained are normalized from the raw scores based on age. The t score ranges from 0-100 with 0 denoting a worse outcome. The Composite is the average of the mean t scores for each component.

    week 3

  • Composite of Memory t Scores

    Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) verbal learning and memory and available to facilitate repeat administration in future testing (10 minutes with delay and recognition). The delayed recall is used as the outcome in this study. Brief Visual Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) is a measure of nonverbal learning and memory captured with immediate and delayed free recall trials, and a recognition memory task (10 minutes with delay and recognition). The retained score is used as the outcome for this study. The t scores for both HVLT-R delayed recall and BVMT-R retained are normalized from the raw scores based on age. The t score ranges from 0-100 with 0 denoting a worse outcome. The Composite is the average of the mean t scores for each component.

    week 6

  • Composite of Executive Function t Scores

    The Trail Making test-B is a test of sequencing between numbers and letters, and the score is the amount of time needed to complete the test. The t score is the raw score for time to completion and errors, normalized by age and education, and ranges from 0 (poor performance) to 100 (good performance). WAIS Digit Span subtest Reverse is a measure of working memory, and requires repetition of increasingly longer strings of digits in the reverse order. The t scores are raw scores normalized by age and range from 0 to 100. WAIS-III Digit-Symbol Coding is a measure of visuomotor processing speed, and requires involves rapidly coding geometric symbols given a number, by using a legend of number-symbol pairs at the top of the page. T scores are raw scores normalized by age, and range from 0 to 100. The composite outcome included average of the mean t scores for Trailmaking B, Digit span reverse, and digit-symbol coding.

    baseline

  • Composite of Executive Function z Scores

    The Trail Making test-B is a test of sequencing between numbers and letters, and the score is the amount of time needed to complete the test. The t score is the raw score for time to completion and errors, normalized by age and education, and ranges from 0 (poor performance) to 100 (good performance). WAIS Digit Span subtest Reverse is a measure of working memory, and requires repetition of increasingly longer strings of digits in the reverse order. The t scores are raw scores normalized by age and range from 0 to 100. WAIS-III Digit-Symbol Coding is a measure of visuomotor processing speed, and requires involves rapidly coding geometric symbols given a number, by using a legend of number-symbol pairs at the top of the page. T scores are raw scores normalized by age, and range from 0 to 100. The composite outcome included average of the mean t scores for Trailmaking B, Digit span reverse, and digit-symbol coding.

    week 3

  • Composite of Executive Function z Scores

    The Trail Making test-B is a test of sequencing between numbers and letters, and the score is the amount of time needed to complete the test. The t score is the raw score for time to completion and errors, normalized by age and education, and ranges from 0 (poor performance) to 100 (good performance). WAIS Digit Span subtest Reverse is a measure of working memory, and requires repetition of increasingly longer strings of digits in the reverse order. The t scores are raw scores normalized by age and range from 0 to 100. WAIS-III Digit-Symbol Coding is a measure of visuomotor processing speed, and requires involves rapidly coding geometric symbols given a number, by using a legend of number-symbol pairs at the top of the page. T scores are raw scores normalized by age, and range from 0 to 100. The composite outcome included average of the mean t scores for Trailmaking B, Digit span reverse, and digit-symbol coding.

    week 6

  • Verbal Fluency

    These tasks of verbal fluency provide the subject one minute to say as many words as possible. For Animal Naming, any living creature is counted. For FAS, words beginning with a given letter (F, A, and then S) are counted excluding proper nouns, numbers, and variations of the same word. Raw scores are converted to t scores, normalized by age, and range from 0 (worse) to 100 (better) outcome.

    baseline

  • Verbal Fluency

    These tasks of verbal fluency provide the subject one minute to say as many words as possible. For Animal Naming, any living creature is counted. For FAS, words beginning with a given letter (F, A, and then S) are counted excluding proper nouns, numbers, and variations of the same word. Raw scores are converted to t scores, normalized by age, and range from 0 (worse) to 100 (better) outcome.

    week 3

  • Verbal Fluency

    These tasks of verbal fluency provide the subject one minute to say as many words as possible. For Animal Naming, any living creature is counted. For FAS, words beginning with a given letter (F, A, and then S) are counted excluding proper nouns, numbers, and variations of the same word. Raw scores are converted to t scores, normalized by age, and range from 0 (worse) to 100 (better) outcome.

    week 6

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

    Baseline, week 3, week 6

  • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Question (PHQ-9)

    Baseline, week 3, week 6

  • Story Memory Recall

    baseline, week 3, week 6

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale:

    baseline, week 3, week 6

  • Modified Caregiver Strain Index

    baseline, week 3, week 6

  • Modified Rankin Score (MRS)

    Baseline, week 3, week 6

Study Arms (2)

Intranasal Insulin

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Intranasal Insulin (20 IU BID): Humulin insulin packaged is in single-dose ampules and inserted into the VianaseTM chamber. Ampoules are dispensed in 3 week supplies per study visit. Patients/caregivers, investigators, and outcome assessors are masked to group assignment. Subjects will receive their first dose in clinic, and wait 2 hrs to determine any adverse effects of inhaled dose. Glucose levels will be measured to monitor for hypoglycemia and documented. All subjects will check peak dose blood sugar levels with glucometer, 3 times per week during insulin treatment.

Drug: Intranasal Insulin

Intranasal Saline

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Intranasal saline: Saline is packaged in single-dose ampules and inserted into the VianaseTM chamber. Ampoules are dispensed in 3 week supplies per study visit. Patients/caregivers, investigators, and outcome assessors are masked to group assignment. Subjects will receive their first dose in clinic, and wait 2 hrs to determine any adverse effects of inhaled dose. Glucose levels will be measured to monitor for hypoglycemia and documented. All subjects will check peak dose blood sugar levels with glucometer, 3 times per week during insulin treatment.

Drug: Intranasal saline

Interventions

Delivery is with the Vianase device, 20 IU twice daily for 3 weeks.

Also known as: Humulin insulin
Intranasal Insulin

Delivery is with the Vianase device, 0.5 cc of normal saline

Also known as: normal saline
Intranasal Saline

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 89 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Ischemic stroke and measurable deficit on the initial NIHSS (\> 1)
  • Cognitive impairment within the 5th and 50th percentiles for age, race, and education based on Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) or 2 out of 5 delayed recall or less on the MoCA.
  • Able to sign informed consent, have a caregiver, and live within a reasonable driving distance from Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients under age 40 or 90 years or older
  • Living in skilled nursing facility
  • Severe stroke deficits at 4 weeks that prohibit participation in cognitive testing (global or receptive aphasia, or severe expressive aphasia)
  • Diabetes requiring insulin
  • Psychiatric disorders
  • Severe head trauma
  • Alcoholism
  • Neurologic disorders other than stroke
  • Renal disease
  • hepatic disease
  • chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • unstable cardiac disease
  • those with prior deficits in ADLs and IADLs

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157-1043, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

InsulinSaline Solution

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ProinsulinInsulinsPancreatic HormonesPeptide HormonesHormonesHormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone AntagonistsPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsCrystalloid SolutionsIsotonic SolutionsSolutionsPharmaceutical Preparations

Results Point of Contact

Title
Cheryl Bushnell, MD
Organization
Wake Forest School of Medicine

Study Officials

  • Cheryl Bushnell, MD

    Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2016

First Posted

June 23, 2016

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion

March 4, 2020

Study Completion

March 4, 2020

Last Updated

May 13, 2021

Results First Posted

May 13, 2021

Record last verified: 2020-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations