Minimally Invasive Pancreatico-duodenectomy
LPD
Comparative Study Between Minimally Invasive Pancreatico-duodenectomy and Open Pancreatico-duodenectomy for Periampullary Tumors
1 other identifier
interventional
40
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Open pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the standard treatment for a wide array of periampullary and pancreatic diseases including malignant and benign conditions. The outcome of PD has improved over the last two decades due to advances in surgical techniques, anesthesia and perioperative care. Although studies from high volume centers demonstrate reduce in the operative mortality to less than 3%, the postoperative morbidity rate is still ranging from 30% to 60%. Laparoscopic surgery is being used increasingly as a less invasive alternative to traditional interventions for pancreatic resection. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is a difficult procedure that has become increasingly popular. Nevertheless, comparative data on outcomes remain limited. In this prospective randomized study, investigators evaluate the safety and feasibility of surgical and oncological outcomes of minimally invasive PD compared to conventional open PD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 15, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 21, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2018
CompletedMarch 3, 2021
June 1, 2016
2.1 years
June 15, 2016
March 2, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
duration of hospital stay
hospital stay
one month
Secondary Outcomes (3)
postoperative pancreatic fistula
30 days
operative time
intraoperative hours
blood loss
intraoperative hours
Study Arms (2)
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORLaparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy Under general anesthesia, the patient is placed in a supine position with the legs abducted. Carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum is established using an open technique through a 10-mm trocar over the umbilicus. A 30 telescope is inserted to examine the peritoneal cavity, liver, stomach, and mesentric vessels.Then 4 to 6 more trocars are inserted under direct vision in the epigastrium and upper quadrants 1. dissection 2. reconstruction
Open pancreaticoduodenectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATOROpen pancreaticoduodenectomy Abdomen is opened from the Bilateral Subcostal incision. (Chevron's Incision) 2. Abdominal cavity is explored for metastasis especially in liver, base of mesentary, mesocolon and pelvis. Dissection Reconstruction Pancreaticogastrostomy Hepaticojejunostomy is next- Done in single layer and can be performed in interrupted or continuous fashion. Gastrojejunostomy is the final step of reconstruction.
Interventions
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy 1. dissection 2. reconstruction
Open pancreaticoduodenectomy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age from less than 70 years.
- Tumor size less than or equal 3cm.
- No vascular invasion.
You may not qualify if:
- Multiple prior abdominal surgeries.
- Body mass index \>40.
- Locally advanced tumors .
- Inability to withstand prolonged anesthesia.
- Tumor size more than 3 cm.
- Patients who received chemoradiotherapy.
- Pregnant females.
- Patients with cirrhotic liver.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (6)
El Nakeeb A, Salah T, Sultan A, El Hemaly M, Askr W, Ezzat H, Hamdy E, Atef E, El Hanafy E, El-Geidie A, Abdel Wahab M, Abdallah T. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience). World J Surg. 2013 Jun;37(6):1405-18. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1998-5.
PMID: 23494109RESULTEl Nakeeb A, Askr W, Mahdy Y, Elgawalby A, El Sorogy M, Abu Zeied M, Abdallah T, Abd Elwahab M. Delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, predictors of severity and outcome. A single center experience of 588 cases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Jun;19(6):1093-100. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2795-2. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
PMID: 25759078RESULTSenthilnathan P, Srivatsan Gurumurthy S, Gul SI, Sabnis S, Natesan AV, Palanisamy NV, Praveen Raj P, Subbiah R, Ramakrishnan P, Palanivelu C. Long-term results of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary cancer-experience of 130 cases from a tertiary-care center in South India. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Apr;25(4):295-300. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0502. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
PMID: 25789541RESULTDokmak S, Fteriche FS, Aussilhou B, Bensafta Y, Levy P, Ruszniewski P, Belghiti J, Sauvanet A. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy should not be routine for resection of periampullary tumors. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 May;220(5):831-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.052. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
PMID: 25840531RESULTCroome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, Kendrick ML. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg. 2014 Oct;260(4):633-8; discussion 638-40. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000937.
PMID: 25203880RESULTGuerra F, Levi Sandri GB, Amore Bonapasta S, Farsi M, Coratti A. The role of robotics in widening the range of application of minimally invasive surgery for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreatology. 2016 Mar-Apr;16(2):293-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.12.007. Epub 2015 Dec 23. No abstract available.
PMID: 26774496RESULT
Related Links
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ayman El Nakeeb, MD
Mansoura University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Gastroenterology surgical center, mansoura university
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 15, 2016
First Posted
June 21, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2018
Study Completion
June 1, 2018
Last Updated
March 3, 2021
Record last verified: 2016-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share