Twitter and Diabetes
2 other identifiers
interventional
628
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Twitter use is surprisingly well represented across broad demographic population segments and health-related messages. The promise of using Twitter is that its use is growing rapidly, it allows the investigators to view communications that were impossible to intercept before, and it potentially provides information faster and less expensively than collection from other media channels. Prior work also supports that social media interventions can improve health behavior change (e.g. weight loss, physical activity) and outcomes.The overarching goals of this proposal are to understand the uses and limitations of this communication channel to improve patients' ability to manage their CV health condition.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable diabetes
Started Jun 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable diabetes
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 21, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 21, 2024
CompletedOctober 21, 2024
October 1, 2024
1.9 years
June 16, 2016
October 2, 2023
October 2, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Patient Activation Measure (PAM) Score From Baseline
The Patient Activation Measure (PAM) is a validated and reliable tool that assesses a person's ability to manage their health, using a 100-point total score scale and four activation levels. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes-specifically, higher scores represent better outcomes. The overall score is summed from individual items, reflecting the level of activation and self-management ability. The four levels are: Level 1 (Score: 0-47.0): Lowest activation, indicating disengagement and lack of confidence in managing health. Level 2 (Score: 47.1-55.1): Some awareness of self-management but limited skills and confidence. Level 3 (Score: 55.2-67.0): Actively trying to manage health but inconsistent success. Level 4 (Score: 67.1-100): Highest activation, indicating confidence and proactive health management.
baseline and 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline
baseline and 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Twitter Diabetes Control
NO INTERVENTIONThis group will be identified as having diabetes from Twitter. This group will be contacted and asked to complete brief surveys
Twitter Diabetes Intervention
EXPERIMENTALThis group will be identified as having diabetes from Twitter. This group will be contacted and asked to complete brief surveys. This group will be asked to use twitter for heart health ( e.g. tweeting, following, receiving tweets)
Interventions
This group will be asked to use twitter for heart health ( e.g. tweeting, following, receiving tweets)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- diabetes
- uses social media
You may not qualify if:
- \<21 years of age
- pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The actual impact of regular tweeting about health may not have been fully actualized in this study. Creating de novo content requires a certain amount of inertia, and prior work shows that individuals engage on social media as passive consumers. The study design was intended to be pragmatic and model real-world use of social media, we did not provide any additional nudges, and although a weekly reminder was useful, participants may have needed feedback on how their tweets were being received.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director of Research
- Organization
- Center for Digital Health
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2016
First Posted
June 21, 2016
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion
May 1, 2018
Study Completion
August 1, 2018
Last Updated
October 21, 2024
Results First Posted
October 21, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share