Comparative Study Between Biodentine and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Sealing Root Perforations
A Comparative Study of the Performance of Biodentine and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) in Sealing Root Perforations.
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a study aimed to compare two materials: (1) Biodentine and (2) MTA. These two materials are going to be tested in sealing accidental root perforations at the bifurcation areas. The study is going to be conducted as a randomized controlled trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 15, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 20, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2017
CompletedJanuary 3, 2018
December 1, 2017
2.5 years
June 15, 2016
December 31, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Success at 3 months following root sealing
Case is considered successful if clinical and radiographic examinations of the tooth are sound 100%.
The success of treatment is assessed at three months following the application of the material
Success at 6 months following root sealing
Case is considered successful if clinical and radiographic examinations of the tooth are sound 100%.
The success of treatment is assessed at 6 months following the application of the material
Success at 9 months following root sealing
Case is considered successful if clinical and radiographic examinations of the tooth are sound 100%.
The success of treatment is assessed at 9 months following the application of the material
Success at 12 months following root sealing
Case is considered successful if clinical and radiographic examinations of the tooth are sound 100%.
The success of treatment is assessed at 12 months following the application of the material
Success at 18 months following root sealing
Case is considered successful if clinical and radiographic examinations of the tooth are sound 100%.
The success of treatment is assessed at 18 months following the application of the material
Success at 24 months following root sealing
Case is considered successful if clinical and radiographic examinations of the tooth are sound 100%.
The success of treatment is assessed at 24 months following the application of the material
Study Arms (2)
Biodentine
EXPERIMENTALThe perforation area of the root is going to be covered by Biodentine
MTA
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe perforation area of the root is going to be covered by MTA.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- vital molars (upper or lower )
- suffered from perforation in the bifurcation area of the roots through a process of open access cavity, taking into account the location and size of perforation
- Perforation should not exceed the size of 3 mm
- Perforation and must also take into account the time of perforation.
You may not qualify if:
- If the molar not vital.
- If the perforation not in bifurcation root or extended inside the canals.
- Size of perforation larger than 3 mm.
- A long time ago on the occurrence of perforation with resorption in tooth structure.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Operative Dentistry, University of Damascus Dental School
Damascus, DM20AM18, Syria
Related Publications (5)
Guneser MB, Akbulut MB, Eldeniz AU. Effect of various endodontic irrigants on the push-out bond strength of biodentine and conventional root perforation repair materials. J Endod. 2013 Mar;39(3):380-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.033. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
PMID: 23402511BACKGROUNDIwamoto CE, Adachi E, Pameijer CH, Barnes D, Romberg EE, Jefferies S. Clinical and histological evaluation of white ProRoot MTA in direct pulp capping. Am J Dent. 2006 Apr;19(2):85-90.
PMID: 16764130BACKGROUNDKoubi G, Colon P, Franquin JC, Hartmann A, Richard G, Faure MO, Lambert G. Clinical evaluation of the performance and safety of a new dentine substitute, Biodentine, in the restoration of posterior teeth - a prospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Jan;17(1):243-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0701-9. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
PMID: 22411260BACKGROUNDLaurent P, Camps J, De Meo M, Dejou J, About I. Induction of specific cell responses to a Ca(3)SiO(5)-based posterior restorative material. Dent Mater. 2008 Nov;24(11):1486-94. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.020. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
PMID: 18448160BACKGROUNDZanini M, Sautier JM, Berdal A, Simon S. Biodentine induces immortalized murine pulp cell differentiation into odontoblast-like cells and stimulates biomineralization. J Endod. 2012 Sep;38(9):1220-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.04.018. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
PMID: 22892739BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohammad MN Aldakak, DDS MSc
PhD Student in Operative Dentistry
- STUDY CHAIR
Souad Abboud, DDS MSc PhD
Associate Professor of Operative Dentistry, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 15, 2016
First Posted
June 17, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 20, 2017
Study Completion
October 30, 2017
Last Updated
January 3, 2018
Record last verified: 2017-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share