NCT02803255

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that a robot-aided rehabilitation protocol that follows the "assist-as needed" paradigm provide statistically significant improvements in arm and hand motor functions when compared to robot-aided protocols that passively move patients' arms along pre-defined trajectories, in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
14

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2014

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2015

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 25, 2016

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 16, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

June 16, 2016

Status Verified

May 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

May 25, 2016

Last Update Submit

June 13, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

InjuriesSpinal Cord

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in ARAT score

    Difference between values measured i) <1 week before treatment start and ii) <1 week after the end of the 2-4 week long treatment program

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Change in Modified Ashworth Scale

    Difference between values measured i) <1 week before treatment start and ii) <1 week after the end of the 2-4 week long treatment program

  • Change in Grip Pinch Strength Assessment

    Difference between values measured i) <1 week before treatment start and ii) <1 week after the end of the 2-4 week long treatment program

  • Change in Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension

    Difference between values measured i) <1 week before treatment start and ii) <1 week after the end of the 2-4 week long treatment program

  • Change in Smoothness metrics

    Difference between values measured i) <1 week before treatment start and ii) <1 week after the end of the 2-4 week long treatment program

  • Change in smoothness metrics

    Difference between values measured i) treatment start day and ii) session 10 of the therapy program - 2-4 weeks after treatment start

Study Arms (2)

Assist-As-Needed Control

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects in this group will interact with a robotic exoskeleton, the MAHI Exo-II, programmed with an "adaptive mode". In this mode, the robot will continuously assist motion along pre-defined trajectories, but will employ an "assist-as-needed" protocol. Here, the amount of assistance provided by the robot will not be always the 100% of that required to complete the task (as in the position control mode), but only a fraction of it. The robot will continuously estimate the residual movement capabilities of the subject, depending on the specific joint addressed in the movement, and will estimate the remaining contribution needed to complete the movement following a predefined trajectory, thus avoiding to over-support motion.

Device: MAHI Exo-II

Subject-Triggered Control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects in group B will interact with a robotic exoskeleton, the MAHI Exo-II, controlled via the subject-triggered mode, as in a previous clinical trial with the MAHI Exo II robotic system. In the subject triggered mode, the MAHIExo II is commanded to regulate joints motion following a position-control control scheme, and using as desired trajectories standardized single-joints profiles that require motion of one of the axes of the exoskeleton (i.e. elbow flexion and extension, forearm pronation and supination, wrist radial and ulnar deviation, wrist flexion and extension). The switch to position control of the exoskeleton is triggered by the application of sufficient force by the subject, in a previous phase where the robot implements a virtual wall.

Device: MAHI Exo-II

Interventions

Also known as: Robot-aided movement therapy
Assist-As-Needed ControlSubject-Triggered Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Providing written informed consent prior to any study related procedures;
  • Age between 18-75 years;
  • Diagnosis of chronic complete or incomplete spinal cord injury as defined by the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment scale classification and at least for 6 months;
  • Not being involved in any specific exercise program (e.g., NMES, FES) within the previous 3 months;
  • No planned alteration in upper-extremity therapy or medication for muscle tone during the course of the study;
  • Eligibility for standard rehabilitation at the time of enrollment (i.e., absence medical comorbidities that would prevent standard rehabilitation);
  • No condition (e.g., severe arthritis, extreme shoulder pain) that would interfere with valid administration of the measures or with interpreting motor testing;

You may not qualify if:

  • Any joint contracture or severe spasticity in the affected upper extremity, as measured by a Modified Ashworth Score \> than 3 out of 4;
  • Subject who cannot provide self-transportation to the study location.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Rice University

Houston, Texas, 77005, United States

Location

TIRR Memorial Hermann

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Frullo JM, Elinger J, Pehlivan AU, Fitle K, Nedley K, Francisco GE, Sergi F, O'Malley MK. Effects of Assist-As-Needed Upper Extremity Robotic Therapy after Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Parallel-Group Controlled Trial. Front Neurorobot. 2017 Jun 13;11:26. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2017.00026. eCollection 2017.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord InjuriesWounds and Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous System

Study Officials

  • Marcia K. O'Malley, PhD

    William Marsh Rice University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2016

First Posted

June 16, 2016

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion

September 1, 2015

Study Completion

September 1, 2015

Last Updated

June 16, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-05

Locations