NCT02800525

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of picosecond 532 and 1,064 nanometers laser in the treatment of benign pigmented lesions compared with q-switched 532 and 1,064 nanometers laser.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2016

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2016

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 7, 2016

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 15, 2016

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

September 20, 2016

Status Verified

June 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

June 7, 2016

Last Update Submit

September 19, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Benign pigmented lesionsPicosecond laserQ-switched laser

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Doctor evaluation of improvement using quartile scale

    Quartile scale 0-4

    For epidermal lesion: 1 and 3 months after 1 laser treatment. For dermal lesion: 1, 3 and 6 months after 5 laser treatments

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Side effect occurrence

    immediately after treatments, 2, 3, 4, and 12 weeks after the 1st laser treatment, and added more 1, 3 and 6 months after 5 laser treatments for dermal lesions

  • Patients evaluation of improvement using quartile scale

    For epidermal lesion: 1 and 3 months after 1 laser treatment. For dermal lesion: 1, 3 and 6 months after 5 laser treatments

Study Arms (2)

Picosecond laser

EXPERIMENTAL

The pigmented lesions on this half-side of the face would be treated with picosecond laser. For epidermal lesions, 1 laser treatment would be performed. For dermal lesions, 5 laser treatments would be performed every 3 month-interval. The wavelength of 532 or 1064 nm would be chosen for appropriate lesions

Device: Picosecond laser

Q-switched Nd:YAG laser

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The pigmented lesions on this half-side of the face would be treated with q-switched Nd:YAG laser. For epidermal lesions, 1 laser treatment would be performed. For dermal lesions, 5 laser treatments would be performed every 3 month-interval. The wavelength of 532 or 1064 nm would be chosen for appropriate lesions

Device: Q-switched Nd:YAG laser

Interventions

Picosecond 532 and 1064 nm laser Treatment of facial pigmented lesions. The energy using depends on the endpoint of immediate whitening of the lesions. The wavelength using depends on the depth of lesions.

Picosecond laser

Q-switched Nd-YAG 532 and 1064 nm laser. Treatment of facial pigmented lesions. The energy using depends on the endpoint of immediate whitening of the lesions. The wavelength using depends on the depth of lesion.

Q-switched Nd:YAG laser

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • age \>18
  • having any benign pigmented lesions on both sides of the face or any tattoo on any part of body which would like to be removed
  • Fitzpatrick skin phototype 3-5

You may not qualify if:

  • Previously treated with any laser within 3 months before enrollment into the study
  • Patients with lesions with any clinical suspicion of being pre-cancerous or skin malignancies of any kind
  • Patients who have photosensitive dermatoses
  • Pregnancy and lactation woman
  • Patients with wound infections (herpes, other) on the day of treatment
  • Patients with moderate and severe inflammatory acne, Immunosuppressed patients, history of vitiligo
  • Patients with unrealistic concerns/expectations and inability to do the appropriate post-operative care

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Dermatology, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

Bangkok, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand

RECRUITING

Related Publications (5)

  • Friedman DJ. Successful Treatment of a Red and Black Professional Tattoo in Skin Type VI With a Picosecond Dual-Wavelength, Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet Laser. Dermatol Surg. 2016 Sep;42(9):1121-3. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000780. No abstract available.

  • Levin MK, Ng E, Bae YS, Brauer JA, Geronemus RG. Treatment of pigmentary disorders in patients with skin of color with a novel 755 nm picosecond, Q-switched ruby, and Q-switched Nd:YAG nanosecond lasers: A retrospective photographic review. Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Feb;48(2):181-7. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22454.

  • Chan JC, Shek SY, Kono T, Yeung CK, Chan HH. A retrospective analysis on the management of pigmented lesions using a picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser in Asians. Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Jan;48(1):23-9. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22443. Epub 2015 Dec 22.

  • Bogdan Allemann I, Goldberg DJ. Benign pigmented lesions. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2011;42:81-96. doi: 10.1159/000328267. Epub 2011 Aug 16.

  • Bukvic Mokos Z, Lipozencic J, Ceovic R, Stulhofer Buzina D, Kostovic K. Laser therapy of pigmented lesions: pro and contra. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2010;18(3):185-9.

Study Officials

  • Woraphong Manuskiatti, Prof., M.D.

    Department of Dermatology, Siriraj Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Woraphong Manuskiatti, Prof., M.D.

CONTACT

Chanida Ungaksornpairote, M.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2016

First Posted

June 15, 2016

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion

September 1, 2018

Study Completion

September 1, 2018

Last Updated

September 20, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-06

Locations