Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of BF-200 ALA for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis With Photodynamic Therapy
A Randomized, Observer Blind, Multinational Phase III Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Nanoemulsion Gel Formulation BF-200 ALA, in Comparison With Metvix® and Placebo, for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis With PDT
1 other identifier
interventional
571
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to evaluate the non-inferiority of BF-200 ALA (Ameluz) in the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK) with photodynamic therapy (PDT) compared to Metvix.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Apr 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 26, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 14, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 23, 2017
CompletedApril 28, 2017
March 1, 2017
1.3 years
May 26, 2016
September 7, 2016
March 28, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT), ITT
An overall complete responder was defined as a subject in whom all treated lesions were cleared (all lesions showing complete remission) 12 weeks after the last PDT. The outcome measure considered complete responders who were completely cleared 12 weeks after the first PDT and responders who were completely cleared 12 weeks after the second PDT if a re-treatment was necessary (in case of partial- or non-responding lesions 12 weeks after the first PDT)
12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeks after the first treatment
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT), PP
An overall complete responder was defined as a subject in whom all treated lesions were cleared (all lesions showing complete remission) 12 weeks after the last PDT. The outcome measure considered complete responders who were completely cleared 12 weeks after the first PDT and responders who were completely cleared 12 weeks after the second PDT if a re-treatment was necessary (in case of partial- or non-responding lesions 12 weeks after the first PDT)
12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeks after the first treatment
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) Illuminated With Narrow Spectrum Devices Only
Subgroup analysis of patients treated with a narrow spectrum device for PDT Illumination (\~630 nm). An overall complete responder was defined as a subject in whom all treated lesions were cleared (all lesions showing complete remission) 12 weeks after the last PDT. The outcome measure considered complete responders who were completely cleared 12 weeks after the first PDT and responders who were completely cleared 12 weeks after the second PDT if a re-treatment was necessary (in case of partial- or non-responding lesions 12 weeks after the first PDT)
12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeks after the first treatment
Secondary Outcomes (32)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response 3-4 Weeks After First Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)
3-4 weeks after the first PDT
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response 12 Weeks After First Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)
12 weeks after the first PDT
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response 3-4 Weeks After the Second Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)
3-4 weeks after the second PDT, 15-16 weeks after first treatment
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response 12 Weeks After Second Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)
12 weeks after the second PDT, 24 weeks after first treatment
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response 3-4 Weeks After Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)
3-4 weeks after the last PDT, up to 16 weeks after the first treatment
- +27 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
BF-200 ALA
ACTIVE COMPARATORTopical application of BF-200 ALA gel containing 78 mg/g 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA). Application of a 1 mm thick layer covering each lesion and a 0.5 cm to 1 cm surrounding margin.
MAL Cream
ACTIVE COMPARATORTopical application of MAL cream (Metvix) containing 160 mg/g methyl-aminolevulinate (MAL). Application of a 1 mm thick layer covering each lesion and a 0.5 cm to 1 cm surrounding margin.
Vehicle
PLACEBO COMPARATORTopical application of matched Placebo to BF-200 ALA gel (without containing active ingredient) ). Application of a 1 mm thick layer covering each lesion and a 0.5 cm to 1 cm surrounding margin.
Interventions
topical treatment for photodynamic therapy combining drug application and after a 3 h incubation subsequent illumination with a broad or narrow spectrum light source.
topical treatment for photodynamic therapy combining drug application and after a 3 h incubation subsequent illumination with a broad or narrow spectrum light source.
topical treatment for photodynamic therapy combining vehicle application and after a 3 h incubation subsequent illumination with a broad or narrow spectrum light source.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Written informed consent.
- Men and women between 18 and 85 years of age.
- AK lesions of 0.5 to 1.5 cm diameter of mild to moderate intensity (Olsen grade 1 and 2) in the face and/or on the bald scalp. Lesions on the eyes, nostrils, ears and mouth were not considered for treatment during the planned study.
- Target AK lesions were to be discrete and quantifiable; adjacent AK lesions were to show a minimum distance of 1.0 cm from one another.
- Confirmation of AK by biopsy taken at screening.
- Free of significant physical abnormalities (e.g., tattoos, dermatoses) in the potential treatment region that could have caused difficulty with examination or final evaluation.
- Willingness to stop the use of moisturizers and any other topical treatments within the treatment region.
- Good general health condition.
- No extensive sunbathing or solarium use during the trial.
- Negative pregnancy test at screening.
You may not qualify if:
- Known hypersensitivity to BF-200 ALA, MAL (methyl-aminolevulinic acid) and/or any of the ingredients of the formulations
- Clinically significant medical conditions (tumor disease etc.) making implementation of the protocol or interpretation of the study results difficult
- Presence of photodermatoses
- Presence of other tumors in the treatment areas within the last 4 weeks
- Start of treatment with phototoxic or photoallergic drugs within 8 weeks prior to screening
- Current treatment with immunosuppression therapy
- Hypersensitivity to porphyrins
- Presence of porphyria
- Presence of inherited or acquired coagulation defect
- Any topical treatment within the treatment area within 12 weeks before PDT1 (first PDT Treatment)
- Topical treatment with ALA or MAL outside the treatment area during participation in the study
- None of the specified systemic treatments within the designated period before PDT1
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Biofrontera Bioscience GmbHlead
- Accovion GmbHcollaborator
Related Publications (2)
Dirschka T, Radny P, Dominicus R, Mensing H, Bruning H, Jenne L, Karl L, Sebastian M, Oster-Schmidt C, Klovekorn W, Reinhold U, Tanner M, Grone D, Deichmann M, Simon M, Hubinger F, Hofbauer G, Krahn-Senftleben G, Borrosch F, Reich K, Berking C, Wolf P, Lehmann P, Moers-Carpi M, Honigsmann H, Wernicke-Panten K, Helwig C, Foguet M, Schmitz B, Lubbert H, Szeimies RM; AK-CT002 Study Group. Photodynamic therapy with BF-200 ALA for the treatment of actinic keratosis: results of a multicentre, randomized, observer-blind phase III study in comparison with a registered methyl-5-aminolaevulinate cream and placebo. Br J Dermatol. 2012 Jan;166(1):137-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10613.x. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
PMID: 21910711BACKGROUNDDirschka T, Radny P, Dominicus R, Mensing H, Bruning H, Jenne L, Karl L, Sebastian M, Oster-Schmidt C, Klovekorn W, Reinhold U, Tanner M, Grone D, Deichmann M, Simon M, Hubinger F, Hofbauer G, Krahn-Senftleben G, Borrosch F, Reich K, Berking C, Wolf P, Lehmann P, Moers-Carpi M, Honigsmann H, Wernicke-Panten K, Hahn S, Pabst G, Voss D, Foguet M, Schmitz B, Lubbert H, Szeimies RM; AK-CT002 Study Group; AK-CT003 Study Group. Long-term (6 and 12 months) follow-up of two prospective, randomized, controlled phase III trials of photodynamic therapy with BF-200 ALA and methyl aminolaevulinate for the treatment of actinic keratosis. Br J Dermatol. 2013 Apr;168(4):825-36. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12158.
PMID: 23252768BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Beate Schmitz
- Organization
- Biofrontera Bioscience GmbH
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas Dirschka, Prof. Dr.
Akademische Lehrpraxis der Universität Witten-Herdecke Heinz-Fangman-Straße 57 42287 Wuppertal
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 26, 2016
First Posted
June 14, 2016
Study Start
April 1, 2008
Primary Completion
August 1, 2009
Study Completion
August 1, 2009
Last Updated
April 28, 2017
Results First Posted
March 23, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share