NCT02799069

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the non-inferiority of BF-200 ALA (Ameluz) in the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK) with photodynamic therapy (PDT) compared to Metvix.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
571

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2008

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2008

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2009

Completed
6.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 26, 2016

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 14, 2016

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 23, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

April 28, 2017

Status Verified

March 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

May 26, 2016

Results QC Date

September 7, 2016

Last Update Submit

March 28, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Percentage of Participants With Complete Response 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT), ITT

    An overall complete responder was defined as a subject in whom all treated lesions were cleared (all lesions showing complete remission) 12 weeks after the last PDT. The outcome measure considered complete responders who were completely cleared 12 weeks after the first PDT and responders who were completely cleared 12 weeks after the second PDT if a re-treatment was necessary (in case of partial- or non-responding lesions 12 weeks after the first PDT)

    12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeks after the first treatment

  • Percentage of Participants With Complete Response 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT), PP

    An overall complete responder was defined as a subject in whom all treated lesions were cleared (all lesions showing complete remission) 12 weeks after the last PDT. The outcome measure considered complete responders who were completely cleared 12 weeks after the first PDT and responders who were completely cleared 12 weeks after the second PDT if a re-treatment was necessary (in case of partial- or non-responding lesions 12 weeks after the first PDT)

    12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeks after the first treatment

  • Percentage of Participants With Complete Response 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) Illuminated With Narrow Spectrum Devices Only

    Subgroup analysis of patients treated with a narrow spectrum device for PDT Illumination (\~630 nm). An overall complete responder was defined as a subject in whom all treated lesions were cleared (all lesions showing complete remission) 12 weeks after the last PDT. The outcome measure considered complete responders who were completely cleared 12 weeks after the first PDT and responders who were completely cleared 12 weeks after the second PDT if a re-treatment was necessary (in case of partial- or non-responding lesions 12 weeks after the first PDT)

    12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeks after the first treatment

Secondary Outcomes (32)

  • Percentage of Participants With Complete Response 3-4 Weeks After First Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)

    3-4 weeks after the first PDT

  • Percentage of Participants With Complete Response 12 Weeks After First Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)

    12 weeks after the first PDT

  • Percentage of Participants With Complete Response 3-4 Weeks After the Second Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)

    3-4 weeks after the second PDT, 15-16 weeks after first treatment

  • Percentage of Participants With Complete Response 12 Weeks After Second Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)

    12 weeks after the second PDT, 24 weeks after first treatment

  • Percentage of Participants With Complete Response 3-4 Weeks After Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)

    3-4 weeks after the last PDT, up to 16 weeks after the first treatment

  • +27 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

BF-200 ALA

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Topical application of BF-200 ALA gel containing 78 mg/g 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA). Application of a 1 mm thick layer covering each lesion and a 0.5 cm to 1 cm surrounding margin.

Drug: BF-200 ALA

MAL Cream

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Topical application of MAL cream (Metvix) containing 160 mg/g methyl-aminolevulinate (MAL). Application of a 1 mm thick layer covering each lesion and a 0.5 cm to 1 cm surrounding margin.

Drug: MAL Cream

Vehicle

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Topical application of matched Placebo to BF-200 ALA gel (without containing active ingredient) ). Application of a 1 mm thick layer covering each lesion and a 0.5 cm to 1 cm surrounding margin.

Drug: Vehicle

Interventions

topical treatment for photodynamic therapy combining drug application and after a 3 h incubation subsequent illumination with a broad or narrow spectrum light source.

Also known as: Ameluz
BF-200 ALA

topical treatment for photodynamic therapy combining drug application and after a 3 h incubation subsequent illumination with a broad or narrow spectrum light source.

Also known as: Metvix, Metvixia
MAL Cream

topical treatment for photodynamic therapy combining vehicle application and after a 3 h incubation subsequent illumination with a broad or narrow spectrum light source.

Also known as: matched placebo to BF-200 ALA gel
Vehicle

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Written informed consent.
  • Men and women between 18 and 85 years of age.
  • AK lesions of 0.5 to 1.5 cm diameter of mild to moderate intensity (Olsen grade 1 and 2) in the face and/or on the bald scalp. Lesions on the eyes, nostrils, ears and mouth were not considered for treatment during the planned study.
  • Target AK lesions were to be discrete and quantifiable; adjacent AK lesions were to show a minimum distance of 1.0 cm from one another.
  • Confirmation of AK by biopsy taken at screening.
  • Free of significant physical abnormalities (e.g., tattoos, dermatoses) in the potential treatment region that could have caused difficulty with examination or final evaluation.
  • Willingness to stop the use of moisturizers and any other topical treatments within the treatment region.
  • Good general health condition.
  • No extensive sunbathing or solarium use during the trial.
  • Negative pregnancy test at screening.

You may not qualify if:

  • Known hypersensitivity to BF-200 ALA, MAL (methyl-aminolevulinic acid) and/or any of the ingredients of the formulations
  • Clinically significant medical conditions (tumor disease etc.) making implementation of the protocol or interpretation of the study results difficult
  • Presence of photodermatoses
  • Presence of other tumors in the treatment areas within the last 4 weeks
  • Start of treatment with phototoxic or photoallergic drugs within 8 weeks prior to screening
  • Current treatment with immunosuppression therapy
  • Hypersensitivity to porphyrins
  • Presence of porphyria
  • Presence of inherited or acquired coagulation defect
  • Any topical treatment within the treatment area within 12 weeks before PDT1 (first PDT Treatment)
  • Topical treatment with ALA or MAL outside the treatment area during participation in the study
  • None of the specified systemic treatments within the designated period before PDT1

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (2)

  • Dirschka T, Radny P, Dominicus R, Mensing H, Bruning H, Jenne L, Karl L, Sebastian M, Oster-Schmidt C, Klovekorn W, Reinhold U, Tanner M, Grone D, Deichmann M, Simon M, Hubinger F, Hofbauer G, Krahn-Senftleben G, Borrosch F, Reich K, Berking C, Wolf P, Lehmann P, Moers-Carpi M, Honigsmann H, Wernicke-Panten K, Helwig C, Foguet M, Schmitz B, Lubbert H, Szeimies RM; AK-CT002 Study Group. Photodynamic therapy with BF-200 ALA for the treatment of actinic keratosis: results of a multicentre, randomized, observer-blind phase III study in comparison with a registered methyl-5-aminolaevulinate cream and placebo. Br J Dermatol. 2012 Jan;166(1):137-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10613.x. Epub 2011 Dec 21.

    PMID: 21910711BACKGROUND
  • Dirschka T, Radny P, Dominicus R, Mensing H, Bruning H, Jenne L, Karl L, Sebastian M, Oster-Schmidt C, Klovekorn W, Reinhold U, Tanner M, Grone D, Deichmann M, Simon M, Hubinger F, Hofbauer G, Krahn-Senftleben G, Borrosch F, Reich K, Berking C, Wolf P, Lehmann P, Moers-Carpi M, Honigsmann H, Wernicke-Panten K, Hahn S, Pabst G, Voss D, Foguet M, Schmitz B, Lubbert H, Szeimies RM; AK-CT002 Study Group; AK-CT003 Study Group. Long-term (6 and 12 months) follow-up of two prospective, randomized, controlled phase III trials of photodynamic therapy with BF-200 ALA and methyl aminolaevulinate for the treatment of actinic keratosis. Br J Dermatol. 2013 Apr;168(4):825-36. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12158.

    PMID: 23252768BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Keratosis, Actinic

Interventions

BF-200 ALAAminolevulinic Acidmethyl 5-aminolevulinate

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Precancerous ConditionsNeoplasmsKeratosisSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Levulinic AcidsKeto AcidsCarboxylic AcidsOrganic ChemicalsAmino AcidsAmino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Beate Schmitz
Organization
Biofrontera Bioscience GmbH

Study Officials

  • Thomas Dirschka, Prof. Dr.

    Akademische Lehrpraxis der Universität Witten-Herdecke Heinz-Fangman-Straße 57 42287 Wuppertal

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2016

First Posted

June 14, 2016

Study Start

April 1, 2008

Primary Completion

August 1, 2009

Study Completion

August 1, 2009

Last Updated

April 28, 2017

Results First Posted

March 23, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share