NCT02797639|Completed
Collaborative Consultation for Participation Among Students With IDD
The Effectiveness of Collaborative Consultation for Participation Among Students With Moderate Intellectual Disability (Co-PID)
Loading search results
The Effectiveness of Collaborative Consultation for Participation Among Students With Moderate Intellectual Disability (Co-PID)
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Study Start
September 2014
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
August 2015
Actual (reported)Study Completion
May 2016
Actual (reported)Objective: Developing and corroborating the Collaborative Consultation for Participation of Students with Intellectual Disability (Co-PID) program, for enhancing classroom participation among students with moderate Intellectual and Developmental Disability (IDD). Method: study took place in two special education schools and included students with moderate IDD (n=60) and their teachers (n=11). The settings were randomly assigned to intervention or control group. In the intervention group, Co-PID program was employed; in the control group an In-Service (IS) was employed. Participation was evaluated at pre-test and post-test.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
May 2016
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
September 2014
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
August 2015
Actual (reported)May 2016
Actual (reported)May 28, 2016
Actual (reported)June 13, 2016
Actual (reported)Structured Observation of Students' Participation in Class
A structured observation for examining participation of students with moderate IDD in the classroom. It includes 25 items that focus on three classroom participation skills: (a) Communicating (listening and expressing; 7 statements); (b) Choosing (8 statements), and (c) Initiating (10 statements). The observer rates the active participation of students during an entire lesson (about 45 minutes), with regards to each of the items, on a scale of 0 (Does not participate) to 4 (Fully participates). In addition, each statement includes a 'Not relevant' option - when the student was not given the opportunity to perform the task.
within one month after intervention completion
School Function Assessment Questionnaire "through study completion"
within one month after intervention completion
Goal Attainment Scaling "through study completion"
within one month after intervention completion
Eight collaborative consultation meetings between occupational therapist to each teacher in purpose of enhancing participation of students in class
Three in- service meetings to all homeroom teachers together, in purpose of enhancing participation of students in class
The program was carried out by the school occupational therapist and homeroom teachers. The Co-PID had two phases. The first phase was a 1.5 hour in-service meeting that focused on the concept of "Participation". In the second phase of the Co-PID intervention, a collaborative consultation model was used. It included eight 45-minute consultation meetings, which took place every other week over a 3-months period. The meetings took place between the occupational therapist and each teacher, with the purpose of brainstorming; thinking of activities that the teacher could implement during the lessons for enhancing participation among the students.
Naomi Weintraub, Prof
Hebrew University
60 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
May 28, 2016
First Posted
June 13, 2016
Study Start
September 2014
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
IS group included three meetings, a 1.5 hour in-service meeting focusing on the concept of participation, and two more workshop meetings aimed at sharing teachers' experience.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
August 2015
Actual (reported)Study Completion
May 2016
Actual (reported)Last Updated
June 14, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-06
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: