NCT02797444

Brief Summary

Advance Care Planning (ACP) is a process of 'reflection and communication, in which a person with decision-making capacity makes decisions regarding their future health and/or personal care in the event that they become incapable of consenting to or refusing treatment' Most Canadians have not planned for end-of-life Care and are at risk of aggressive medical care that may not be compatible with their wishes. This study aims to systematically evaluate local barriers to making personal choices with regards to life support interventions that can be provided in the contemporary Intensive Care Unit.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2015

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2015

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 31, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 13, 2016

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

September 28, 2017

Status Verified

February 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

March 31, 2016

Last Update Submit

September 27, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Lay person perception and knowledge of various Critical Care interventions

    This is a qualitative study. The primary objective of this proposal is to assess public knowledge of Critical Care interventions (and their outcomes) from the perspective of making Advance Care Plans. Examples of such interventions include but are not limited to Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, dialysis and artificial feeding. Outcomes involve lay person knowledge, beliefs and perceptions of Critical care from the perspective of making Advance Care Plans.

    1 year

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age55 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Healthy lay persons living at home in London, ON.

You may qualify if:

  • Members from the community who are i) \> 55 yrs of age, ii) living in London Middlesex community, iii) not housebound, iv) in apparent good health and iv) have the ability to make independent decisions for themselves

You may not qualify if:

  • Factors that preclude a meaningful interview (such as cognitive impairment, aphasia, profound hearing impairment, language barriers) or anticipated emotional burden with the proposed topic.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Dr. Ravi Taneja

London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada

Location

London Health Sciences Centre

London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Teixeira AA, Hanvey L, Tayler C, Barwich D, Baxter S, Heyland DK; Canadian Researchers at End of Life Network (CARENET). What do Canadians think of advanced care planning? Findings from an online opinion poll. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015 Mar;5(1):40-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000473. Epub 2013 Oct 4.

    PMID: 24644188BACKGROUND
  • Taneja R, Faden LY, Schulz V, Rawal A, Miller K, Bishop KA, Lingard L. Advance care planning in community dwellers: A constructivist grounded theory study of values, preferences and conflicts. Palliat Med. 2019 Jan;33(1):66-73. doi: 10.1177/0269216318803487. Epub 2018 Oct 4. No abstract available.

Study Officials

  • Ravi Taneja, MBBS

    London Health Sciences Centre

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2016

First Posted

June 13, 2016

Study Start

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion

June 1, 2017

Study Completion

June 1, 2017

Last Updated

September 28, 2017

Record last verified: 2016-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations