Mallampati Classification vs Best Visible Mallampati for Prediction of Difficult Tracheal Intubation
Comparison of the Mallampati Classification and Best Visible Mallampati for Prediction of Difficult Tracheal Intubation
1 other identifier
observational
3,244
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Mallampati score (classification of the visibility of oropharyngeal structures) should be performed in the sitting position, head in the neutral position, mouth widely open, and tongue protrudes, without phonation. However, phonation, and position modify the visibility of oropharyngeal structures and thus the Mallampati score. We aimed at evaluating the predictive value of the best observable Mallampati score as compare to the recommended Mallampati score.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jun 2017
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 9, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 2, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2019
CompletedFebruary 8, 2023
March 1, 2017
2.6 years
February 9, 2016
February 3, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of patients with difficult airway management
Occurence of either difficult tracheal intubation or difficult face mask ventilation or both Difficult tracheal intubation was defined as an orotracheal intubation requiring more than 2 laryngoscopies, or lasting more than 10 min, or requiring an alternate device (gum elastic bougie, supraglottic device, videolaryngoscope) Difficult mask ventilation was defined as the inability for the anesthesiologist to provide adequate ventilation because of one or more of the following problems: inability for the unassisted anesthesiologists to maintain oxygen saturation \> 92% using 100% oxygen, excessive gas leak requiring use of the oxygen flush valve more than twice, excessive insufflation pressure (\> 25 cmH2O), absence of spirometric measures of exhaled gas flow or a tidal volume \< 3ml/kg, absence or inadequate exhaled carbon dioxide, necessity to perform two-handed mask ventilation
1 day
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of patient with difficult Face Mask Ventilation
1 day
Number of patients with difficult tracheal intubation
1 day
Other Outcomes (1)
Correct Reclassification rate of patients by best view of Mallampati
1 day
Eligibility Criteria
Adult patients (16 years older) scheduled for vascular, orthopedic, urologic, gynecologic, and abdominal surgery. Airway evaluation must be possible in full Orotracheal intubation required for general anesthesia
You may qualify if:
- Scheduled or unscheduled surgery
- Airway evaluation possible in both sitting and supine position
You may not qualify if:
- surgery of the neck, face, and upper airway
- lung and thoracic surgery
- pregnancy
- orotracheal intubation not indicated during surgery
- nasotracheal intubation required for surgery
- selective intubation required for surgery
- emergency surgery and procedure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital of Caen
Caen, 14033, France
Related Publications (1)
Hanouz JL, Lefrancois V, Boutros M, Fiant AL, Simonet T, Buleon C. Comparison of the modified Mallampati classification score versus the best visible Mallampati score in the prediction of difficult tracheal intubation: a single-centre prospective observational study. Can J Anaesth. 2024 Oct;71(10):1353-1362. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02815-0. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
PMID: 39147992DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jean-Luc Hanouz, M.D.,Ph.D.
University Hospital, Caen
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 9, 2016
First Posted
June 2, 2016
Study Start
June 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2019
Study Completion
December 31, 2019
Last Updated
February 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2017-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share