Collaboration for Antepartum Risk Evaluation
CARE
Interprofessional Perinatal Consults to Improve Communication Quality, Satisfaction, and Team Cohesion: A Randomized Trial of the Collaboration for Antepartum Risk Evaluation (CARE) Model
1 other identifier
interventional
182
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Perinatal outcomes in the US rank behind most other developed countries even though women in the US utilize more maternity services. Current approaches to consultation and collaboration among perinatal care providers, including nurse-midwives, obstetricians, and perinatologists, fragment care resulting in communication errors and maternal dissatisfaction. The CARE study will test an innovative interdisciplinary consult visit to improve communication, teamwork, maternal satisfaction, and perinatal outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 18, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 30, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2020
CompletedDecember 14, 2020
December 1, 2020
4.3 years
May 18, 2016
December 10, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Communication Assessment Tool (CAT)-Team survey
The CAT, developed by Makoul et al., assesses views of provider communication via 14 Likert responses ranging from 1= 'poor' to 5= 'excellent.
2 weeks after intervention/comparison visit
Satisfaction with Prenatal Care (SPC) scale
The SPC scale assesses patient satisfaction with prenatal care
2 weeks after intervention/comparison visit
Communication Assessment Tool (CAT)-Team survey - following birth
The CAT, developed by Makoul et al., assesses views of provider communication via 14 Likert responses ranging from 1= 'poor' to 5= 'excellent.
Within 2 weeks after patient gives birth
Satisfaction with Prenatal Care (SPC) scale - following birth
The SPC scale assesses patient satisfaction with prenatal care
Within 2 weeks after patient gives birth
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Smoking at 1st prenatal visit
1 week after the patient gives birth
For smokers, number of cigarettes per day
1 week after the patient gives birth
Location of birth
1 week after patient gives birth
Provider at admission to labor and delivery
1 week after patient gives birth
Patient & provider adherence to checklist plan
1 week after patient gives birth
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Collaborative Care
EXPERIMENTALIntervention Group: Women (n=118) will be seen one time, simultaneously by a Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) perinatologist and a Vanderbilt University School of Nursing (VUSN) nurse-midwife (the CARE visit). During the CARE visit, the nurse-midwife and perinatologist will complete the CARE checklist The checklist will be signed by the woman and providers and scanned into the medical record. Following the CARE visit, women will return to midwifery care or be referred to perinatology depending on their needs, remaining in the study. Women returning to the midwifery practice will see a primary midwife for the remainder of care.
Comparison Care- Usual Care + primary midwife
ACTIVE COMPARATORComparison Group: Usual care enhanced with primary midwife. Women in the comparison group (n=118) will receive the standard individual consult visit with a perinatologist and then, if they return to midwifery care, have one consistent midwife (primary midwife) for the majority of remaining prenatal care.
Interventions
Intervention Group: Women (n=118) will be seen one time, simultaneously by a VUMC perinatologist and a VUSN nurse-midwife (the CARE visit). During the CARE visit, the nurse-midwife and perinatologist will complete the CARE checklist The checklist will be signed by the woman and providers and scanned into the medical record. Following the CARE visit, women will return to midwifery care or be referred to perinatology depending on their needs, remaining in the study. Women returning to the midwifery practice will see a primary midwife for the remainder of care.
Comparison Group: Usual care enhanced with primary midwife. Women in the comparison group (n=118) will receive the standard individual consult visit with a perinatologist and then, if they return to midwifery care, have one consistent midwife (primary midwife) for the majority of remaining prenatal care.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult pregnant women receiving prenatal care at the VUSN Nurse-Midwifery Faculty Practice.
- Gestational age of pregnancy 4-40 weeks
- Needs a consultation with perinatologist for one of the following reasons:
- Prior pregnancy with congenital abnormality History of fetal demise \>20 weeks History of preterm labor in previous pregnancy Current maternal drug or alcohol abuse Controlled maternal condition (e.g. thyroid disorder) Mild abnormality of fetus or placenta on ultrasound Idiopathic thrombocytopenia in pregnancy
- Can attend the collaborative care clinic
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to give consent for research participation - including age \< 18 or impaired mental function
- Urgent medical condition requiring immediate assessment including: ectopic pregnancy or vaginal bleeding
- Medical conditions outside of scope of VUSN midwifery guidelines including:
- Chronic maternal conditions requiring specialist involvement including: HIV, epilepsy, uncontrolled asthma, and liver, renal, cardiac disease.
- Multiple gestation \> 2 previous cesarean births Rh isoimmunization Incompetent cervix Major fetal or placenta abnormalities
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Vanderbilt School of Nursing
Nashville, Tennessee, 37240, United States
Related Publications (1)
Phillippi JC, Doersam JK, Neal JL, Roumie CL. Electronic Informed Consent to Facilitate Recruitment of Pregnant Women Into Research. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2018 Jul;47(4):529-534. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2018.04.134.
PMID: 29758172DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Julia Phillippi, PhD
Vanderbilt School of Nursing
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 18, 2016
First Posted
May 30, 2016
Study Start
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 1, 2020
Study Completion
October 1, 2020
Last Updated
December 14, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Will share deindentified data after submission of the Data Use Agreement
- Access Criteria
- To be determined
Will share deindentified data after submission of the Data Use Agreement