Cost Efficacy Evaluation of Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
ROBOTCAP
Medico-economic Evaluation of Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
3
Brief Summary
In this observational cost efficacy study, the investigator compare the Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP) versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy (RALP). Every cost of care that include hospitalization related or post operative medical consumption are obtained and recorded up to 5 years follow up. Functional results (continence, potency, quality of life) are obtained through standardised questionnaires. Carcinologic results are estimated by Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) relapse and salvage treatments. Economic evaluation will be made to estimate direct costs of the four postoperative year along with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per successful surgical treatment (preserved urinary continence and erectile function and PSA \< 0.2).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable prostate-cancer
Started May 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable prostate-cancer
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 20, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 27, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2016
CompletedJune 5, 2017
June 1, 2017
3 years
May 20, 2016
June 2, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Erectile function
Proportion of patients with recovery of erectile function between T0 (before surgery) and 12 months after surgery. Recovery is defined as a maximum decrease of 5 points score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) between pre and postoperative evaluations.
12 months after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Surgical margins
During surgery
Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)
Before surgery (T0), 6 months (M6), 12 months (M12), 24 months (M24) and 60 months (M60) after surgery
Continence
Before surgery (T0), 6 months (M6), 9 months (M9),12 months (M12), 24 months (M24) and 60 months (M60) after surgery
Tolerance
Perioperative period, 6 months (M6), 12 months (M12) and 24 months (M24) afer surgery
Quality of life
Before surgery (T0), 6 months (M6), 9 months (M9),12 months (M12) and 24 months (M24) after surgery
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
EXPERIMENTALRobotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy using da Vinci Surgical System
Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Localized prostate cancer
- Gleason grade ≤ 3 + 4
- PSA \< 15 ng / mL
- Stage ≤ T2b
- Eligible to receive laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
- Candidate bilateral or unilateral erectile preservation
You may not qualify if:
- Patient at high risk of postoperative progression (PSA\> 15 ng / mL; grade 5 predominant, clinical or radiological stage T3
- Presenting erectile dysfunction (IIEF \< 22)
- Past history of urinary incontinence (\> grade 1 WHO)
- Body mass index \> 30
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Service d'Urologie - Clinique St Augustin
Bordeaux, 33074, France
Service d'Urologie et Chirurgie de la Transplantation - Hôpital Edouard Herriot -Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lyon, 69437, France
Service d'Urologie - Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
Paris, 75014, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 20, 2016
First Posted
May 27, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2010
Primary Completion
May 1, 2013
Study Completion
August 1, 2016
Last Updated
June 5, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06