Contribution of Preoperative Biological Data in Risk Assessment in Cardiac Surgery in Addition to the EuroSCORE (EuroSCOREbio)
EuroSCOREbio
3 other identifiers
observational
9,500
1 country
10
Brief Summary
In cardiac surgery, the assessment of operative risk and quality of care is a major challenge for both patient, and surgical team. It is also important for health care decisionmakers to have predictive tools to compare alternative technics such as conventional cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology. Since 1998, the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE), updated in 2012 (EuroSCORE II) is the most universally used system in this purpose. Its success is the result of a good balance between predictive capability and simplicity. It consists almost exclusively of clinical variables. However, the objectivity and the predictive ability of some of those clinical items remain controversial, particularly those addressing severity of illness for high-risk patients. For instance, the degree of priority is submitted to the subjective assessment by the surgical team at the time of surgery. Objective data describing the severity of patients arriving in the operating room are still missing. Many biomarkers are relevant in qualifying severity of syndromes: shock (PH, lactates, LDH), heart disease (N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), troponin T and I), respiratory disorder (blood gaz analysis), liver insufficiency (TP, factor V), renal impairment (serum creatinine, creatinine clearance), inflammatory condition (fibrinogen, CRP), or the underlying medical condition such as diabetes (HbA1c, microalbuminuria) and nutritional status (albumin). In ICU, many scores use biological data to measure, on daily basis, the severity of the patient status. Their routine use is simplified by applications available on smartphones. They are drawn into hospital information systems. In cardiac surgery, some studies seem to demonstrate the measurement of some preoperative biological variables (eg NT Pro-BNP ...) in risk prediction. In terms of diabetes, HbA1c is of particular interest because it detects underlying diabetes if unknown (emergent situation) or reflects its poor control before surgery. This criterion could be more reliable than the simple information of patient treated by insulin (EuroSCORE II criterion). Finally, the reinforcement of existing scores with biological variables is recommended by the group of recommendations in prognostic research strategy (PROGRESS 2014), rather than creating new scores ex nihilo. The hypothesis is that adding biological data collected at the time of arrival of the patient in the operating room would better qualify the patients' severity condition and therefore increase the risk prediction of early mortality and severe morbidity after cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study is to test this hypothesis and especially test whether the biological data would increase the EuroSCORE II performance, by improving the prediction for high-risk patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Aug 2016
Typical duration for all trials
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 24, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 26, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2018
CompletedAugust 1, 2019
July 1, 2019
2.4 years
May 24, 2016
July 31, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Occurence of mortality at 90 days and/or occurence of severe morbidity during hospitalization.
1- Mortality criterion 90-day mortality. In addition, the date of death from the surgery date and the release date from the hospital will clarify the subcategories (30-day mortality and hospital mortality). 2- Severe post operative morbidity Criteria At least one of the following criteria: i. Intensive care hospital stay\> 8 days ii. Total post operative hospital stay\> 21 days (full stay including intensive care) iii. Postoperative ventilation time\> 72 H and/or need for tracheotomy iv. Need for a "neo-dialysis" in postoperative v. Need for cardiac reoperation after surgery vi. Postoperative mediastinal infection vii. Permanent stroke post operatively. viii. Need for intra-aortic balloon pump or circulatory support for acute cardiopulmonary failure.
120 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation criteria of risk profiles of population (French Overseas Department /Western Europe).
120 days
Study Arms (1)
Cardiac surgery
All patients (planned and urgent) needed cardiac surgery, and agreed to participate
Interventions
Patient's usual care as part of cardiac surgery, analysis of biological data collected at the time of arrival of the patient in the operating room. Blood sample collection Urine sample collection
Eligibility Criteria
All patients needed cardiac surgery during 1 year at the different sites (in France (8 sites), and in two French Overseas Departments (2 sites))
You may qualify if:
- All patients operated on extracorporeal circulation or beating heart
- Patient affiliated to a social security scheme
- Patient having been informed of the research objectives
- Patient not objecting to participate in research
You may not qualify if:
- Patient receiving heart transplant
- Patient \< 18 years old
- Patient refusing to participate in the study
- Pregnant women
- Protected adult (person under guardianship and trusteeship) or deprived of liberty
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital Center of Martiniquelead
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, FRANCEcollaborator
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, FRANCEcollaborator
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, FRANCEcollaborator
- University Hospital, Limogescollaborator
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, FRANCEcollaborator
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de La Réunion, FRANCEcollaborator
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, FRANCEcollaborator
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijoncollaborator
Study Sites (10)
CHU de Martinique
Fort-de-France, Martinique, 97261, France
CHU d'Angers
Angers, 49100, France
CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, 33600, France
CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France
CHU de Dijon
Dijon, 21000, France
CHU de Limoges
Limoges, 87000, France
Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP)
Paris, 75013, France
Hôpital Bichat (AP-HP)
Paris, 75018, France
CHU de La Réunion
Saint-Denis, 97400, France
CHU de Toulouse
Toulouse, 31400, France
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
François ROQUES, MD, PhD
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 24, 2016
First Posted
May 26, 2016
Study Start
August 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 31, 2018
Study Completion
December 31, 2018
Last Updated
August 1, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share