The Gas Mask: the Effects on Respiration!
Impact of Gas Masks on Index of Efforts and Breathing Pattern
2 other identifiers
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: The gas mask is used to protect military and non-military subjects exposed to respiratory hazards (CBRN agents). The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of the gas mask on respiratory patterns and indexes of the respiratory effort. Methods: We are completing our study with 14 healthy subjects to evaluate breathing patterns, index of respiratory efforts and blood gases. Seven conditions have been tested in a randomized order: at rest, during effort (on a tread mill, standardized at 7 METs for all subjects) and during induced hypoxemia with and without a mask (C4, Airboss Defence, Bromont, Canada). Airway pressure, inspiratory and expiratory flows were measured. An esophageal catheter was introduced at the beginning of the study to measure esophageal pressure (Peso) and calculate indexes of respiratory effort (PTPeso, WOB). SpO2 was continuously measured and capillary blood bases were drawn at the end of each condition. Each condition lasted 10 minutes, data of the last 2 minutes at a steady state were considered for analyses. Results: The preliminary analyses based on 10 subjects are presented here. Comparing the wearing of the gas mask and without, most of the respiratory index increased in the tested conditions (at rest, during induced hypoxemia and during effort). At rest, in 8 out of 10 healthy subject the indexes of effort were higher with the gas mask, a statistical trend was observed with the WOB (0.22±0.13 vs. 0.28±0.10 J/cycle; p = 0.059), the PTPes (101±35 vs. 122±47 cmH2O\*s; p=0.21) and SwingPeso (4.4±2.0 vs. 5.3±2.0 cmH2O; p=0.13). During the effort, the respiratory index increased (WOB 4.0±2.6 vs. 5.6±3.2; p=0.10; PTPeso 406±211 vs. 606±65; p=0.04; SwingPeso 14.8±8.1 vs. 21.8±9.0; p=0.13). There was no difference for the breathing pattern and arterial blood gases data with and without mask. Data for induced hypoxemia are under analysis. We measured on bench the inspiratory and expiratory resistances of the tested gas mask (C4: inspiratory resistances = 3.2 cmH2O at 1 L/sec; expiratory resistances = 0.9 cmH2O at 1 L/sec). This may explain in part the increased work of breathing with masks. Conclusions: This study demonstrated an increase of the indexes of respiratory effort during an exercise with the gas mask. This study is the first to directly assess the indexes of efforts with esophageal pressure in this situation. Our results and method may be used as a reference for evaluating tolerance with different designs of gas masks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 26, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2016
CompletedSeptember 29, 2016
September 1, 2016
1.1 years
May 19, 2016
September 27, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
indexes of respiratory effort
In this study, we speculate the work of breathing is increasing with the use of a gas mask at rest, under hypoxemia condition and during physical effort.
10 minutes
Study Arms (3)
Baseline
EXPERIMENTALRandomised baseline without and with gas mask.
Induced Hypoxemia
EXPERIMENTALRandomised hypoxemia: i. without gas mask; ii. with gas mask; and iii. correction with FreeO2 and gas mask.
Effort
EXPERIMENTALRandomised effort without and with gas mask
Interventions
We have been evaluating breathing patterns, index of respiratory efforts and blood gases in all randomized conditions. A gas mask has been used mask (C4, Airboss Defence, Bromont, Canada). Airway pressure, inspiratory and expiratory flows have been measured. An esophageal catheter has been introduced at the beginning of the study to measure esophageal pressure (Peso) and calculate indexes of respiratory effort (PTPeso, WOB). SpO2 has been continuously measured and capillary blood bases were drawn at the end of each condition. Each condition lasted 10 minutes, data of the last 2 minutes at a steady state has been considered for analyses.
During the conditions that involved a gas mask, the measurement of the work of breathing is achieved with a oesophageal catheter and two disposable pneumotachs. While the oesophageal catheter has been fixed to the mandibular with an hypo-allergic tape, the two pneumotachs are hooked respectively on the canister and exhalation port of the gas mask. Investigators have induced the hypoxemia with a mixture nitreous and medical gas in a plastic bag that has been setted up to the canister. The FiO2 level has been kept to 14 percent.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Having no significant cardiac and respiratory pathology
- Having no history of epilepsy
- Having no severe and chronic pathology that requires medication
- Not being pregnant
- Face size: medium
You may not qualify if:
- Refuse to participate in the study for one of the following reasons: i. wearing a oesophageal catheter; ii. wearing the gas mask; iii. giving blood sample; iv. claustrophobia.
- Oesophageal background wounds
- Facial anthropometrical issues.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Laval Universitylead
- Pierre-Alexandre Bouchard, RT.collaborator
- Captain (Ret) Stephane Bourassa, RN.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Institut de recheche universitaire de cardiologie et pneumologie de Québec
Québec, Quebec, G1V4G5, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Bourassa S, Bouchard PA, Dauphin M, Lellouche F. Oxygen Conservation Methods With Automated Titration. Respir Care. 2020 Oct;65(10):1433-1442. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07240. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
PMID: 32071135DERIVEDBourassa S, Bouchard PA, Lellouche F. Impact of Gas Masks on Work of Breathing, Breathing Patterns, and Gas Exchange in Healthy Subjects. Respir Care. 2018 Nov;63(11):1350-1359. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06027. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
PMID: 30065082DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Francois Lellouche, Doctorate
Institut de Recherche Universitaire de Cardiologie et Pneumologie de Québec
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2016
First Posted
May 26, 2016
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
July 1, 2016
Study Completion
July 1, 2016
Last Updated
September 29, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09