NCT02782000

Brief Summary

With the number of aged people increasing and the lifespan lengthen, dementia is becoming a great public challenge in China. Early recognition of dementia is crucial to improve the prognosis of dementia patients and decrease the society disease burden. It is a pity that the early recognition rate of dementia is less than 7% in China. Most of the aged people live in the community and general practitioners (GP) in community provide health service much more frequently than other medical workers. It is suggested that GPs should be the best one to screen dementia in its early period. However, most of GPs have not receive any training about dementia early recognition in China. It is imperative and meaningful to provide training to GPs for improve GPs' knowledge and skills about dementia early recognition. How to train GPs for early recognizing dementia and how about the training effect? Which training model may be better? We did not find consistent conclusion about these questions in China. This study aims to set up an effective and convenient model to training GPs in dementia early recognition. A total of 152 GPs in Beijing will be enrolled and be randomly divided into two groups. One group will firstly have lessons about dementia early recognition and then receive face-to-face supervision and key messages by Wechat about dementia early recognition once a month in the following 6 months. Another group will firstly have lessons about dementia early recognition and then receive face-to-face supervision and key messages by Wechat about dementia early recognition once a month in the following 3 months. The score of knowledge and attitude about dementia early recognition, the accuracy of analyzing dementia cases, the usage of dementia screening scales and the referral rate of dementia will be evaluated at different time point respectively. This study will provide evidence for training GPs effectively in dementia early recognition in the future and will promote dementia early recognition in community.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
162

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2016

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 18, 2016

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 25, 2016

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 12, 2016

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 22, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 18, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

December 27, 2017

Status Verified

December 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

May 18, 2016

Last Update Submit

December 24, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

dementiaearly recognitiongeneral practitionertraining

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference between the change of the score of knowledge about dementia early recognition from baseline to 7th month in the experimental group and that from baseline to 4th month in the active comparator group.

    up to 7 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Difference between the change of the score of attitude about dementia early recognition from baseline to 7th month in the experimental group and that from baseline to 4th month in the active comparator group.

    up to 7 months

  • Difference between the change of the accurate rate of analyzing dementia case from baseline to 7th month in the experimental group and that from baseline to 4th month in the active comparator group.

    up to 7 months

  • Difference between the number of the elderly screened by each general practitioner per month through the study in the experimental group and that in the active comparator group.

    up to 7 months

Study Arms (2)

Long-term supervision group

EXPERIMENTAL

Firstly, this group will having lessons about dementia early recognition. Second, this group will receive face-to-face supervision and key messages by Wechat about dementia early recognition once a month in the following 6 months.

Other: lessons,long-term supervision and message

Short-term supervision group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Firstly, this group will having lessons about dementia early recognition. Second, this group will receive face-to-face supervision and key messages by Wechat about dementia early recognition once a month in the following 3 months.

Other: lessons,short-term supervision and message

Interventions

Long-term supervision group
Short-term supervision group

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • General practitioner on-the-job and providing outpatient service
  • Can complete the intervention and questionnaire;
  • Providing informed consent voluntarily.

You may not qualify if:

  • General practitioner who may take a long-term vacation during the study
  • Providing less than once outpatient service every week;
  • Having no condition to use Wechat;
  • Refuse to join in this study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Lv X, Zhao M, Li T, Yuan C, Zhang H, Pu C, Li Z, Zhang N, Yu X, Wang H. Effects of an Enhanced Training on Primary Care Providers Knowledge, Attitudes, Service and Skills of Dementia Detection: A Cluster Randomized Trial. Front Neurol. 2021 Jul 23;12:651826. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.651826. eCollection 2021.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dementia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesNeurocognitive DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Xiaozhen LV, PhD

    Peking University Six Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Researcher

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2016

First Posted

May 25, 2016

Study Start

August 12, 2016

Primary Completion

March 22, 2017

Study Completion

July 18, 2017

Last Updated

December 27, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-12