Individualized Pneumoperitoneum Pressure in Colorectal Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Standard Therapy (IPPCollapse-II)
1 other identifier
interventional
204
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the post-operative recovery quality of the Individualized Pneumoperitoneum Pressure Therapy in Colorectal laparoscopic surgery versus standard therapy using a quality validated scale of postoperative recovery of their stay in the Post-Anaesthesia Recovery Unit.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jan 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 2, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 16, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 25, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 19, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 19, 2018
CompletedApril 15, 2020
August 1, 2019
1.8 years
May 2, 2016
April 14, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS) Physiologic Domain
The primary outcome of the IPPCollapse II study is the recovery of the Physiologic' component of the PQRS score over the assessed time points. The PQRS is a validated multidimensional patient Reported Outcome (PRO) tool designed to assess patients' recovery to baseline status in the postoperative period (www.postopqrs.com). In every patient a baseline measurement of PQRS is performed prior to surgery. After surgery, the measurement of the PQRS is repeated at 15 min (T15) and at 40 min (T40) after arrival in the PACU, as well as in the ward on the morning of postoperative day ( POD) one and three. Physiologic domain includes 9 variables scored from 1-3, 9 is the minimum and worse recover and 27 is the maximum and full recover. But recovery is related to baseline. Each patient is scored at the predefined time points and is classified as either 'recovered' if the score reaches at least the predetermined baseline score or 'not recovered' .
Up to postoperative day 3. This is a longitudinal outcome.
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Chnge Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS)
Up to postoperative day 3. This is a longitudinal outcome.
Daily postoperative complications until hospital discharge (Clavien-Dindo)
Up to postoperative day 28
Basic features of airway pressures (plateauP, peakP, pulmonary Compliance)
Up to 300 minutes during surgical intervention
Intraabdominal pressure
Up to 300 minutes during surgical intervention
Intraabdominal volume
Up to 300 minutes during surgical intervention
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Individualized Pneumoperitoneum Pressure
EXPERIMENTALIn Individualized Pneumoperitoneum Pressure (IPP) group, measures to optimize and individualize intra-abdominal pressure (PIA) will be apply.
Standard Pneumoperitoneum Pressure
OTHERIn Standard Pneumoperitoneum Pressure (SPP) group, a conventional operation without optimization measures and PIA preset to 12 mmHg will be conducted.
Interventions
Deep neuromuscular blockade can only be reversed with sugammadex, so in the IPP group, it will be used as neuromuscular blocking agent and its effect will be reversed with sugammadex (4mg / kg) at the end of the surgery. During surgery: deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC 1-5), Protective ventilation strategy, Optimal position and Pre stretching as a tool to decrease intraabdominal pressure maintaining optimal workspace.
A depolarizing neuromuscular blocking will be used (as routine clinical practice at each center) to maintain moderate neuromuscular blockade and its effect will be reversed with anticholinesterase at the end of the surgery. During surgery: Moderate neuromuscular blockade ( TOF 2-4) , position to surgeon criteria, no prestretching and Protective ventilation. Fixed IAP (12mmHg).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients older than 18 years
- Classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA I-III)
- No cognitive deficits
- Signed informed consent prior to surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Emergency surgery
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Immune disorders
- Kidney or liver disease or advanced-stage cardiopulmonary
- Patient refusal to participate in the study
- Patients under 18 years or inability to consent
- Associated neuromuscular disorders, contraindication for the use of rocuronium/ sugammadex, allergy or hypersensitivity to rocuronium / sugammadex
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital universitario y Politécnico La Fe
Valencia, 46026, Spain
Related Publications (2)
Diaz-Cambronero O, Mazzinari G, Flor Lorente B, Garcia Gregorio N, Robles-Hernandez D, Olmedilla Arnal LE, Martin de Pablos A, Schultz MJ, Errando CL, Argente Navarro MP; IPPColLapSe II study investigators. Effect of an individualized versus standard pneumoperitoneum pressure strategy on postoperative recovery: a randomized clinical trial in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2020 Nov;107(12):1605-1614. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11736. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
PMID: 32506481DERIVEDDiaz-Cambronero O, Mazzinari G, Errando CL, Schultz MJ, Flor Lorente B, Garcia-Gregorio N, Vila Montanes M, Robles-Hernandez D, Olmedilla Arnal LE, Martin-De-Pablos A, Marques Mari A, Argente Navarro MP; IPPCollapse-II study group. An individualised versus a conventional pneumoperitoneum pressure strategy during colorectal laparoscopic surgery: rationale and study protocol for a multicentre randomised clinical study. Trials. 2019 Apr 3;20(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3255-1. Erratum In: Trials. 2020 Jan 13;21(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4055-3.
PMID: 30944044DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Óscar Díaz
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 2, 2016
First Posted
May 16, 2016
Study Start
January 25, 2017
Primary Completion
November 19, 2018
Study Completion
November 19, 2018
Last Updated
April 15, 2020
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share